to minimise the loss of stability

such is the problem with a revolution

without stability

suffering and absolution occurs

I agree with you

slow, gradual change is the way

change should be made with consent

but the elites with always halt it

when it clashes with their interest

their interest is riches and stability

will*

stability is always a goal

people have this idea

that the rich are out to profit in every scenario

it is more of just a case

that they wish to profit through legitimate forms

but they fail to do so

because the equilibrium of the economy

would naturally mean that they can only profit so much

But hurr durr U INHERITED U FASHY

so through illegitimate means

they create profit

and forge accounts

to compensate for this money

even besides that

nobody asks questions

because it is assumed the world economy expands at such a rate

this is accepted by the majority of the world

that this money is legitimate

But U INHERIT means you're evil and not willing to SHARE

<:troll_king:312064227542040576> <:talk:312053622617669633>

inheritance is bullshit if it means you are inheriting a grossly overestimated wealth of an economy

and it usually is so

how so

i just explained

it ruins the equilibrium of the economy

@Deleted User I don't have much of an issue with it if you are actually worth the money.

But the issue comes into play when you get people who have no idea how economics work, and are just spoiled little shits, and get handed a part of the world just for being apart of the bloodline of somebody.

This is the same issue that monarchism has.

Yo, what happened to those millions of Ukrainians during 1932-1933?

soviet famine

Wait, you niggas actually commies?

what disgusting language

.

how unsightly

i shall released my hordes onto you

we shall take your women

your children

your wealth

your countries

we bathe you in tears

and the blood of your own people

for we are the long lasting khanate!

Nigga what?

....

Mongols?

no?

you don't know them?

Not too much

....

😒

this offends me

I wanna say I know but I feel like I might be wrong

say what you think

@Deleted User How old are you?

It’s like to do with the Mongolian empire?

yes!

yes!

yes!

go on...

And Genghis Khan

yes!!

also know as temujin!

he changed his name

to become genghis khan

after uniting the tribes of mongolia under a unified khanate

@Deleted User Atilla did more than genghis khan.

xDD

please....

Atilla owned most of central, east and western asia, and some of eastern europe

the largest continious empire ever

Genghis Khan was a motherfucking pussy magnet

ofc

Yhea, that's what made atilla great.

he had 9 wives

and many children with each

Ain’t it like 40% of the world’s population can trace their dna back to him?

he was first married at 9 years old

yes

many turks

many arabs

and many eastern europeans

his men raped across the world

Attila did the same

the nomads could not be stopped

It’s kinda crazy to think about how quickly the mongols rised then fell

their rise came from unification

but that unification would not lost

@Deleted User Didn't atilla convince his dad not to sack rome?

one of his son's became isolated in the golden khanate