such is the problem with a revolution

without stability

suffering and absolution occurs

I agree with you

slow, gradual change is the way

change should be made with consent

but the elites with always halt it

when it clashes with their interest

their interest is riches and stability

will*

stability is always a goal

people have this idea

that the rich are out to profit in every scenario

it is more of just a case

that they wish to profit through legitimate forms

but they fail to do so

because the equilibrium of the economy

would naturally mean that they can only profit so much

But hurr durr U INHERITED U FASHY

so through illegitimate means

they create profit

and forge accounts

to compensate for this money

even besides that

nobody asks questions

because it is assumed the world economy expands at such a rate

this is accepted by the majority of the world

that this money is legitimate

But U INHERIT means you're evil and not willing to SHARE

<:troll_king:312064227542040576> <:talk:312053622617669633>

inheritance is bullshit if it means you are inheriting a grossly overestimated wealth of an economy

and it usually is so

how so

i just explained

it ruins the equilibrium of the economy

@Deleted User I don't have much of an issue with it if you are actually worth the money.

But the issue comes into play when you get people who have no idea how economics work, and are just spoiled little shits, and get handed a part of the world just for being apart of the bloodline of somebody.

This is the same issue that monarchism has.

Yo, what happened to those millions of Ukrainians during 1932-1933?

soviet famine

Wait, you niggas actually commies?