say israelite

@Deleted User So a khazarian is not an ethnic jew?

They are physically nearly identical.

they are a seperate ethnicity

though very similar

is anyone here happy?

They have the hooked noses, hunch backs, and the behaviour is noticably the same/.

fascist scum here is happy.

i have never seen a jew with a hooked nose

Enjoyment of the far'right

and i have seen non jews with hooked noses

@Deleted User You have not at them "good enough" then, you should also note, that the hooked noses are there naturally by ethnicity, though due to dilution, they are not *always* there.

@Deleted User Also....

It literally only took a google search to figure this shit out....

ethno is not the same thing as race

according to google bosnians and serbs are two ethnicities

even though they are very very very similar

they are different nationalities

based off culture

not genes

ethnicity: the fact or state of belonging to a social group that has a common national or cultural tradition:

But ethnicities are there due to genetics.

if your using google so am

i

Also stop using google for your definitions from mr porko.

you did the same thing

hypocrite

besides anctient pure blooded jews havent existed in hundreds of years

@Deleted User Dictionary.com:
ETHNICITY:
noun, plural ethnicities.
1.
an ethnic group; a social group that shares a common and distinctive culture, religion, language, or the like:
Representatives of several ethnicities were present.
2.
ethnic traits, background, allegiance, or association:
The graph shows class enrollment by gender and ethnicity.



ETHINC:

pertaining to or characteristic of a people, especially a group (ethnic group) sharing a common and distinctive culture, religion, language, or the like.
2.
referring to the origin, classification, characteristics, etc., of such groups.
3.
being a member of an ethnic group, especially of a group that is a minority within a larger society:
ethnic Chinese in San Francisco.
4.
of, relating to, or characteristic of members of such a group.
5.
belonging to or deriving from the cultural, religious, or linguistic traditions of a people or country:
ethnic dances.
6.
(of a human being) displaying characteristics, as in physical appearance, language, or accent, that can cause one to be identified by others as a member of a minority ethnic group:
Her new boyfriend looks ethnic to me.
7.
Obsolete. pagan; heathen.

@Deleted User So they all had a common origin, characteristic, and classification....

it doesnt have to be a genetic

as it also said cultural

If they came from a similar backround, it does not matter what their culture, or religion was, they are still of the same ethnicity.

haring a common and distinctive culture, religion, language, or the like.

This is what makes jews genetic, due to their offspring being jewish, they therefore have a similar backround, making them apart of the jewish ethnicity.

what if a jew mates with someone whos not jewish

than again

and again

and again

and again

at what point are they not jewish

@Deleted User It depends on race and ethnicity of course, if it is a nigger, or a spic, then their genetics are thouroughly fucked.

you do realize

thats is exactly what has been happeneing

to every ethnicity

since the roman empire

Pretty much.

Globalization is a bitch.

so no one i pure anything

heck if you did a dna test your probably 1 percent black

Nope, there are pures.

They just become more rare over time.

the pures live in tribes

on islands

north sentinel island

Not really, pures are more common on islands FOR SURE. But they do exist on the mainland as well, even if they are few and far between.

if its intentional they are probably inbred

if not than its just meh

Meh it is then.

the sentinalese resisting globalization since bc times

they live on an island by india

@Deleted User how do you feel about the last tribe resisting the modern world and taking down helicopters with bows and arrows

@Deleted User Indians must make some really shitty helicopters.

nope they just got really good arrows its also illegal to contact them @Deleted User

because they sacrifice and eat people they existed for 60000 years

Says who?

the one interview weve had with a sentinalese peron

they died of disease

thus they hate all outsiders

because of the british

Mate, it is not our fault that we became resistant to the common cold.

well your american not british

also we dont know if they have fire

the indian government basically just leaves them alone

do you think thats for the best

Meh, just don't go crying when common cold manages to appear on the island and kills everybody there.

mutiple people have gone there

the sentinalese remain

the people who go there

not so much

is that the world you want

a world were all countries are like north sentinal

A bunch of negroes who have no technology at all and just live to fuck and survive until the ripe old age of 20? No thanks.

uhmm they are from india

not africa

Their skin looks like a negroes to me!

well they aint

they are probably the closest relatives to anctient humans

because they have not crossbred at all

What is an anchient human to you>

cavemen

Well no shit, I think we can come to that conclusion safely. But be more specific.

living till 20

disease everywhere

essentially a tribe

what about you

Pretty much the same except everybody is separated geographically and by race.

all humans come from africa originally

NOPE.

actually yes

that is where we dicovered the oldest fossils

and the most human ancestors

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2017/05/22/europe-birthplace-mankind-not-africa-scientists-find/
https://www.utoronto.ca/news/human-ancestors-originated-europe-not-africa-u-t-part-international-team-studying-pre-human
http://www.newsweek.com/first-hominin-europe-east-africa-human-evolution-613494

homonin is not human

its ape

homo is human

homo evolved from africa we know that

ape is debatable

humans are a type of ape

but where our pre homo ancestors came from is debatable

but which homo ancestor do you mean

homo erectus

@Deleted User It literally says in the article that it is presumable from the fossils that humans may have evolved inside EUROPE instead of africa, meaning that the first humans could have roamed europe instead of africa.

(And I forgot to mention how the first actual form of civilization formed in the middle east, meaning that africa had no play in it.)

they say homonins

apes

pre humans

not humans

maybe humanity should unite and form a state in this land

leave the rest of the area to nature

also there WAS a human species that existed in europe

they were neandertaals

there is no more neandertaals

other than hybrids

I have also noticed something interesting and something worth of note. There is actually very little evidence to base the fact that humans originated from africa outside of fossils, but that is all that they merely are; follils, we will probably never know what truly happened, but I seriously doubt that a bunch of negroes were responsible for the origin of humanity, but rather, humans are evolved from many different species, which after hundreds of thousands of years finally began making their own civilizations and technology, it defineatly makes sense considering that each race is much more different than each other physically, mentally, and emotionally. Here is an article that you should also read:

europeans and asians have the most neandertaal dna however whilst africans have very little

Oh whoops that is the wrong one.

@Deleted User And great, I closed the tab I had open earlier in a private window.... great.....

i think humans are a mix of various human species

and its an unbalanced mix

but it will in time balance itself out

@Deleted User **Did you not fucking read what I said?**

yes but you think they were many species i think it was one

absorbing the others

You just fucking said that humans are a mix of different human species.

its very un even

No shit, that is why blacks, whites, asians, and spics exist.

homo sapiens (ones from africa) absorbed all the others

And what evidence do you have for that outside of one or two fossils which date back millions of years ago?

human genome

Elaborate.

and the fact whites and asians have part neandertaal genes

and people from central africa dont

But from what we know, the neanderthaals were just one race that formed along with us, and were killed off after millions of years.

they werent killed off we learned they were assimulated

"We learned" How?

genes

the genes in the people from europe

And if that is the case, how have we never found any neanderthaals running around on islands or in isolated jungles in africa?
That is but a theory, it does not explain how potentially hundreds of millions of apes could suddenly die off in a mass extinction event.

they werent on islands

they were on the mainland

we found them in asia and european mainland

How do you know?

That's right you don't.

My eyes are not that of an ant that can read 90P resolution images.

http://www.sci-news.com/othersciences/anthropology/science-neanderthal-genes-modern-human-dna-01734.html

your part neandertaal how do you feel

@Deleted User Oh.... I see that somebody has been using wikipedia....

@Deleted User The article does not explain how they all suddenly died out by the hundreds of millions, it just says "Hey, your ancestors had sex with a neanderthal.".

i actually sent you a lik

we dont know

That's right, we don't.

its possible we just kept comming

and they died out

and assimulated

That is unlikely, humanity was scarce up until civilizations such as rome became a thing.

it could have also been a factor

species need mutiple factors to go extinct

https://www.seeker.com/all-non-africans-part-neanderthal-genetics-confirm-1765302858.html

@Deleted User But most humans are related to neadnerthals?

yup they had nice asses

@Deleted User assuming the theory is correct what do you think of it

Neanderthals are generally classified by paleontologists as the species Homo neanderthalensis, having separated from the Homo sapiens lineage 600,000 years ago, or alternatively, as a subspecies of Homo sapiens (Homo sapiens neanderthalensis).

@Deleted User But I don't assume it is correct.

yes you because you dont want it to be true we know we fucked em

and had babies

as i think we did many other species

and if we do divide ourselfs amongst ethnicity you have to accept theese borders @Deleted User https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/308950154222895104/393553109210759168/unknown.png?width=712&height=424

@Deleted User No I don't.

why not

theese will also be the new borders of africa

@Deleted User

new borders of the middle east

@Deleted User what do you think

are you ready to see asia

central asian borders

@Deleted User what do you think of the new borders

new china borders

@Deleted User are you ok with the border gore

;your sub human

your the kid who gets beat up by his parents

anti gay officials need to be hanged

eskimo the reactionary memer

how was kindergarten yeterday

https://discord.gg/MzBtG7c

Kekistani SFSR

The level of shitposting here is the highest I have seen in any server

i wish i had nukes

Wouldn't be enough

ok i wish i was the only one with nukes

All that power to rule them all

Hello

what do you think of north korea

Me?

There are no staff here so nobody gets in trouble

everyone

Degenerate "worker's" state

still better than america

america needs a revolution NOW

Both are shitholes

One is an isolated husk that could very well have become a proper socialist state

The other one is capitalism in one of its most horrid forms

what would you do if america had a revolution in 3 months

Use it to springboard a revolution in my country

Depends on revolution, and all of its variables

What its basis are, am I experiencing it or witnessing from the outside, etc

Anime profile pictures are degenerate @Deleted User

witnessing from the outside

Yes

Ni🅱🅱a are you a trotskyist @Hervepärka

@33 k

Not sure, still many things to learn

I thought since you referred to NK as a degenerated workers state

Yes

It's a deformed workers state, they never had power

I grabbed from trotsky

i think north korea is still loads better than south korea

Plus it fits the bill

and need to rule all of korea

so it can be fixed

Strong words there

Specially when you talk about a state that is only communist by name

They have all the tools, only their leaders stop them

Hello everyone

yes but it would be way better than south korea because south kroea is that much worse

Capitalism made world poverty decrease from 85% to 10% on an exponential trend

AMA

The only problem with south korea

Is US imperialism

And capitalism

south korea will always be a us puppet

And even there it isnt in the worst

north korea is free from us imperialism

Still

@Deleted User Not inherently bad