https://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/127428224

Nah, its still fun 🚁

It is more acceptable to provide a small description with the link.

I feel it was within a larger shitposting continuum, but leave it to marxists to insist on over-regulating things

TFW commies

@OF-8 your thread is closed.

I know.

I wanted the thread to be appreciated in its complete format

Did you want to join in on the ancap fun?

@OF-8 where is the whole interactivity?

Are we not doing it now, Marxist?

Nope

🚁

@OF-8 I prefer an icepick

<:ho:315613510589480964>

As is your aesthetic. My aim is to provide the collectivist with the answer to their existential questions.

The perfect communist utopia exists, just as you hit terminal velocity, and all outcomes are equal.

Splash! The ground goes red with 100% perfect communism.

<:bour:313709044957315082>

@OF-8 it is ok. You condition is cured by book reading.

Its easy

Only when your physical form is evenly distributed among the rocks.

I did, i dont care

marx is an idiot

@OF-8 everything going to be alright.

he's based on other idiots

you're an idiot for not seeing that

@OF-8 which books of Marx have you read?

This is how dogmatists behave

"how much of the dogma have you absorbed"

Every time,.

because your perspective may only exist within the goy goggles of marx

try discussion outside of it

@OF-8 I've read a Bible and I'm against it. It is important to know what you are against.

I do not wish to discuss the details of dogma with the dogmatist.

That's not fun.

>against the bible

fuckin pantson head retarded

how the fuck are you anti-mythology

@OF-8 I wish. From learning the criticism of the dogma you can find freedom.

but you believe in this harry potter meme world bullshit of marx

>learning criticism of the dogma

It is important to know things.

you stupid nigger, this itself is dogma

this is why i find you fucks hilarious

you cant even see that

Without knowledge there is no progress.

Sheer platitude.

All marxian thinking is in platitudinous context

without exception

The wheel was invented very recently in history. The rest of the time people without knowledge were caring things themselves.

More platitude.

No logos.

Try again. desu

First you read. You learn. Then you do criticism.

Not the opposite.

You're doing it wrong.

You've no idea what I've done.

Again, your perspective is platitudinous

VERY LOW RESOLUTION PERSPECTIVES

@OF-8 You didn't read anything. You are twitter generation.

...is this your materialist perspective of the situation, or is the little collectivist buttmad

you cannot be logical in this statement

it has to be buttmad

@OF-8 I asked what books of Marx did you read?

I did not answer.

So you've assumed none.

How platitudinous of you.

@OF-8 Yes.

People assume things.

Well, the very unsmart ones tend to assume the wrong things recusively.

And here we arrive at the 🚁 protocol

@OF-8 So which books did you read?

Irrelevant.

@OF-8 Reading books is relevant.

I reject marx fully and we do not need to discuss it in more detail

Pretty much to everything.

as i reject his forethought

the entirety of post-modernism is cancer

@OF-8

that doesnt mean i havent investigated the cancer a little

but again, its irrelevant.

marx != books

smarter people who were not marx also wrote books

@OF-8 You don't know what you fight against. Would be scary if I were you.

You're firm in this assumption that I don't?

@OF-8 Yes.

Can we give me the charitable gift of assuming i somehow do

@OF-8 Impossible.

So sayeth the dogmatist.

So shall it be.

^_^

>criticizing the dogma

wew lad

@OF-8 people like you do not read.

@ShadyMarxist have you ever read a book called flatland?

I blow through 2 books a week when im busy

I don't read retarded shit tho

unless im doing like a ...ideological investigation

there's two kinds of reading you know, reading for funsies and reading to figure something out