It also present.

😮

It is both abstraction and material.

So does matter ever cease to exist?

You're being irrational.

Subject exists objectively.

Subject exists in material and as an abstraction.

Presentness is also... you know what.

You stlll using abstraction (A).

How can you use (A) to show what is and isn't an (A)?

It is simple logic. Dialectics say A is also B and C etc.

Simple logic!

Yes.

Another time you say logic is wrong.

More than one variable i know.

Its more complicated than A = A.

How come your logic is right and mine is wrong?

But still good. Memorize. A is also B and also C etc...

One logic reflects material world better.

Because it is made for material world.

Ah...

Another logic is abstract.

That's special pleading again.

Logic is not enough.

Logic provides a connection between our models and our measurements and observations.

Especially the lesser type of logic.

A=A is a no brainer.

Wew.

There is so much more combinations. M = K and S and F.

Much better and more complex logic.

Dialectical materialism is the strongest in logic.

What is so good about diamat and so bad about Aristotelian logic?

It provides you a more objective perception of matter.

How?

By using a dialectical method.

So you hope.

I have no hope.

The superiority of diamat is based in dogma

But it gives us more agile thought method.

So?

It is good for the evolution.

Keep going.

For revolution too.

You see you're reasons will infinitely regress.

You have no reason, it is dogmatic belief.

Reason is subjective.

Just like diamat.

Yes, it is a subjective form of objective.

But you cannot explain why.

It is better than other logic.

Not very logical.

Because it gives more options. Other logic is X = X. Our logic is complex. X is H and also P and will become K.

And this makes it more or less true?

Our logic is made to reflect matter in most pure form possible.

No, it is based on your abstraction of matter.

Yes.

That is the same thing.

An abstraction is not objective.

It can be objective.

More or less.

Unlikely.

It always is. Some people have better understanding of reality, some not. Some more objective.

By random chance, sure. But because they hold diamat over Aristotelian logic? That is not clear since diamat is based on an abstraction (about logic) also.

Switching to so simple logic would be like switching from Russian to English. It is terrible to use much less agile language.

Even worse to use less agile logic.

Here we go again with the infinite regress. 'Agility' makes is more or less true?

Agility makes it more suitable to reflect matter.

Does it?

yes

You have an argument for that or are we just being dogmatic again.

I'm speaking from experience this time.

Do you have this experience too?

Oh well then it's settle. Personal anecdote wins everytime.

How can you recover?

🎙

anarcho socialism for life

What is up my fellow lefties

Titoism am I right

@Shrimpf Titoism is the light version of fascism.

Everybody knows that.

🤔

Watch "The Jeremy Corbeatles - "Fuck You, The Sun"" on YouTube
https://youtu.be/6OMvAsvykfY

@Deleted User http://mesosyn.com/mental6-6f.jpg https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-MFiTgPNhpvc/Vysu0FJ917I/AAAAAAAADIU/_gENFnfXnpo600jnlCFuxEDqRxS8ERBcQCLcB/s1600/1-dialectical-materialism.jpg http://www.yofiel.com/images/marx.jpg

http://izquotes.com/quotes-pictures/quote-the-philosophers-have-only-interpreted-the-world-in-various-ways-the-point-however-is-to-change-karl-marx-250986.jpg

https://discord.gg/qjgUf

Raid kekistan

Ahh

That was the link I was looking for

Hi all

What this site?

Another socialist discord

http://www.notable-quotes.com/l/vladimir_lenin_quote_3.jpg

Are traps gay?

y

y

Identeties...