Because it is made for material world.

Ah...

Another logic is abstract.

That's special pleading again.

Logic is not enough.

Logic provides a connection between our models and our measurements and observations.

Especially the lesser type of logic.

A=A is a no brainer.

Wew.

There is so much more combinations. M = K and S and F.

Much better and more complex logic.

Dialectical materialism is the strongest in logic.

What is so good about diamat and so bad about Aristotelian logic?

It provides you a more objective perception of matter.

How?

By using a dialectical method.

So you hope.

I have no hope.

The superiority of diamat is based in dogma

But it gives us more agile thought method.

So?

It is good for the evolution.

Keep going.

For revolution too.

You see you're reasons will infinitely regress.

You have no reason, it is dogmatic belief.

Reason is subjective.

Just like diamat.

Yes, it is a subjective form of objective.

But you cannot explain why.

It is better than other logic.

Not very logical.

Because it gives more options. Other logic is X = X. Our logic is complex. X is H and also P and will become K.

And this makes it more or less true?

Our logic is made to reflect matter in most pure form possible.

No, it is based on your abstraction of matter.

Yes.

That is the same thing.

An abstraction is not objective.