also make your reply shortt

@Deleted User I understand that, but in actuality, this country was "built" in large part by non-white laborers.

@Anarchist-Communist And I disagree with that, because it does mean that there is inequality among the races, meaning that they have to be treated differently, if we wish to maintain relations among the races, treating each race equally only gives us the situation we have now, I am not stating that we need to liquidate the non whites, but they need to be treated differently, and separated from the other races, if we wish to maintain not just race relations, but races as a whole.

@Rushack Consrevatives tend ot be poor, so that's why

I hate articles that talk about studies and don't link them

And niggers are poor

@Rushack Was that an attempt at trolling?

fucking daily mail

@Deleted User That's quite the stretch to say in large part

@Deleted User I'm just presenting the data; the facts

@Deleted User Especially since slavery harmed the economy dramatically

https://www.reddit.com/r/beholdthemasterrace/

@(((RobotWizard)))#3986 Those are skinheads, which natsocs hate

Oh boy, this is really falling apart now.

I disagree with @Deleted User. the best way to maintain reace relations is just be cool to people.

Be nice to people regardless of their race.

not all of them are

rex what is your reply

Also, maintaining "race" is a spook.

to this specific statement

fuck whoever you want. Regardless of race.

@Deleted User Only because your low IQ brain can't comprehend a damn thing, faggot

@Anarchist-Communist "fuck whoever you want" Rape?

@Rushack You're being unproductive

https://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2003/01/0131_030203_jubilee2_2.html

no

what a fucking hot take

@Deleted User Niggers should be treated as niggers; it's what these race realists want

what does that mean

@Anarchist-Communist I agree that we should not outright liquidate the non whites, perhaps you should read my statement again, I have no issue with any black, hispanic, or asian, who is decent and will fight beside me while thinking for himself.

@Deleted User Slavery DID harm the economy, as it reduced competition and limited automation, in the north tehy had automation, which is why the north had a superior economy

I support race mixing.

https://www.salon.com/2014/09/07/we_still_lie_about_slavery_heres_the_truth_about_how_the_american_economy_and_power_were_built_on_forced_migration_and_torture/

This doesn't counter my statement

@Deleted User What will happen with the minorities afterwards?

@Deleted User The North, and the US economy in general, was dependent on slave-labor in the South.

@Deleted User That's not true, as that labor would've existed nad did exist regardless of if slavery existed

@Anarchist-Communist I do not, it only mongrelizes the races, and increases poverty, crime, and deals an incredible blow to race relations as well, detroit, chicago, and baltimore are all particularly good examples.

@Deleted User Also that's a very general statement and doesn't really respond to my argument

Those neighborhoods are violent because they are poor.

Not because they are black.

@Deleted User Really? How much cotton did the North produce?

focus on the real shit.

@Deleted User The north was not agricultural so I assume little, however this is not relevant to slavery

@Deleted User You ignore the absurd levels of poverty among whites during the 19th and 20th centuries

Interesting...

The economy of the North was based on manufacturing, whereas textiles were produced in the South via slave labor.

@Deleted User Yes, this slowed down automation and reduced compeition which harmed the economy. You're restating memes on loop and not even reading what i'm writing

@Anarchist-Communist Why did these former wonderfully propserous cities become renowned for crime and poverty? And why did the neighborhoods become violent, when other poor area's can have next to no crime? I would know, I live in a red neck town, where money can be tough to come by for many places, even my neighborhood and closeby ones.

Hell, @Deleted User still ignores crime and poverty levels of crime now. Plenty of areas in America are majority black and not violent.

I will pull it up.

@Anarchist-Communist Am I?

Please, give me evidence.

Okay.

https://www.neighborhoodscout.com/ny/elmont/crime

A majority black neighborhood with a low crime rate.

How did this "slow down" automation and harm the US economy? At the start of the Civil War, production actually increased in the North.

https://www.neighborhoodscout.com/md/fort-washington/crime another one.

@Deleted User I come from a Rustbelt town with some blacks and even Muslims and the white people in the town are honestly a bigger danger to white people there

And cotton prices were at an all time high.

@Deleted User I'm just confused at this point

@Deleted User What are you even talking about

You're failing to defend your position. What I've said is common knowledge.

@Deleted User I said that slavery slowed automation and competition

How?

is that what you're asking

Yeah, how so?

@Anarchist-Communist This is just telling me crime rates in a small area..... what does this prove?

you're not being clear on what you're arguments even are

This iss an odd claim

shit like the cotton gin was a thing

which deliberately ramped up slavery in the us

I really like anecdotal evidence

Tha'ts not even relevant period

@Deleted User you're running away from the point again.

if anything automation created a greater demand for slavery

My town, like many Rustbelt/"Redneck" towns, have a problem with meth selling and producing

what

????????

Slavery is immoral

HUh?

@Anarchist-Communist Am I?

how

@Anarchist-Communist Tell me how.

@Deleted User yes you are.

My argument is that the economy of the North, which was based on manufacturing and thus automation, was dependent on the agricultural economy of the South which produced in demand textiles via slave labor.

@Anarchist-Communist Tell me how then.

@Deleted User Why should I? You're sea-lioning again, fuck you. I already proved you wrong.

@Deleted User

@Deleted User If I am correct, didn't automation BOOST slavery?

yes it did

I said that

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cotton_gin

the cotton gin is a fucking thing

That's such a shit argument bro

no it isn't

its directly linked to an increase in slaves

When you have the means of automation artificially raised