Yeah, Maoist leaning

ffs

this server is the worst during evening

Jfc the Hoxhaists should be gassed

It's 11:47 here

Maoists should be Gulagged

@Xinyue No it does not, as i explained before in my points

you have no counterarguments

i am a maoist

Your non-point explained nothing

hoxhaists are gay

now i support xinu

Hoxa gang pride worldwide

@Xinyue literally all you did was talk about scientific socialism, not my argument

Oh yes, Maoist in 2018 - the great ideology of the agrarian-worker-bourgeois alliance is sure to deliver world revolution in the 21st century! Being a Maoist is a refutation of a persons politics by its own.

First world maoism is retarded

i agree

well that point we agree on at least

like, maybe its useful in Afghanistan

or something

but not beyond

Yes

I think that misunderstands Maoism

thats what i support

it's not useful anywhere

Third-Worldism then?

@Enigmatic★Chromatic i am saying maoism is literally third worldist

Since it's not just New Democracy

read the little red book

No not you

Yes, i know

Third World is an epithet

I'm offended

Stfu Storm 😄

NGR I guess I'll call you

ahhh.. now quiet

😌

What exactly are you NGR?

what's an NGR?

He's a NGRo

oh him

call him xinu

Oh I see Xinyue

Anyways

that's too long

Just curious

NPO>NGR

```The 1965 Soviet economic reform, sometimes called the Kosygin reform (Russian: Косыгинская реформа) or Liberman reform, were a set of planned changes in the economy of the Soviet Union (USSR). A centerpiece of these changes was the introduction of profitability and sales as the two key indicators of enterprise success. Some of an enterprise's profits would go to three funds, used to reward workers and expand operations; most would go to the central budget.

The reforms were introduced politically by Alexei Kosygin—who had just become Premier of the Soviet Union following the removal of Nikita Khrushchev—and ratified by the Central Committee in September 1965.

Major changes throughout the Soviet world became possible in 1964 with the ouster of Nikita Khrushchev and the rise of Alexei Kosygin and Leonid Brezhnev.[14] Economic policy was a significant area of retrospective anti-Khrushchev criticism in the Soviet press.[15][16] This 'reformist' economic tendency in the Soviet Union had corollaries and some mutual reinforcement in Eastern Europe.[17]```

So let me get this straight - the people who oust Khrushchev implement the market and profit reforms, and this was made possible only after Khrushchev's ousting, and Khrushchev was criticised by these people for holding onto the old ways, but he's le big rebisionist? 🤔

The accusation of revisionism was on putting the development of forces of production over class struggle as the principle contradiction

@Xinyue Literally i am not supporting brezhnev

he is a idiot aswell

but kruschev is bad

Khrushchev literally did not restore capitalism in USSR

yes

he did

he did not

NEP was just for industrialization

yes he did

I watched the retarded Hakim vid on it

ok fuck haki

m

He obviously did not look into the literature of the 22nd Congress, read Fundamentals of Marxism-Leninism from 1960, or anything

the whole goal was to reach literal communism in 20 years

USSR was not Capitalist?

which was fucking unrealistic

but the point was not to reach fucking capitalism again 😄

I literally did @Xinyue

"Everything that I don't agree with is Capitalist :DDDD"

it was revisionism, and the institution of market reforms

it was by no means capitalist

Market reforms coincided with the 1965 Kosygin Reform

If it isn't my Goymmunism.. it's Gappitalism

<:iq:521476887223074827>

and even that didn't fully restore capitalism, it simply directed Soviet policy towards the MarSoc position which then during Gorbachev led to the wholesale restoration of capitalism by the revisionist bloc

imagine thinking USSR was Capitalist

in 1980s, it became that

and arguably towards end of 1970s

@Xinyue I never said it fully restored capitalism, and gorbachev was horrible

Gorbachev was literal traitor yes

just the market reforms

Gorbachev is gay.

what USSR really needed was an Anti Semetic Pinochet

8000045% of Bolshevikkks were Jews though.

and mind you, Khrushchev kept the whole central planning procedure, he merely decentralised the execution of the central, national plan to the Sovnarkhoz whose whole theoretical justification was to become the basis for the post-state "public self-government" - even the 1936 "Stalin" constitution was kept in place. In reality, most people dislike Khrushchev because of the de-Stalinisation, not for any economically substantiative reasoning

So that was impossible.

Only Aryan Stalin was able to kill enough Jews.

Stalin clearly didn't purge enough people

Stalin purging the hook noses literally ended the manufactured Famines

wew

Stalin was Nazbol gang

@Xinyue literally does not excuse his market reforms and his so called "de-stalinization" was propaganda based

he restored some sanity with banning LGBT and Abortion

that's where what Stalin did good ends tho

wow

I would actually argue the process towards Capitalist restoration truly started after world war too where the line of the development of productive forces won out over furthering class struggle, likely because of the damage done to the USSR. The Market reforms were along those lines of an assumption that abundance and high productive yields were the key to communism

and the funniest part is how Mao, the ***arch-revisionist*** who allied literally with the capitalist West against the USSR, was among Khrushchev's chief accusers.

"Khrushchev Lied"

How about Mao though? Did the room temperature IQ "Anti-Khrushchev Gang" ever consider that perhaps his accusers were lying too? Just a little bit? No? Ok.

Stalin was a homosexual himself.

commie vs commie discussions are boring af

He was originally a woman.

Again you misinterpreted what revisionism means