MUH POLES DINDU NUFFIN

@BabaBooey oh them specifically

Yeah I mean I don’t care

I thought you meant polish

In general

Kulaks didn't exist, what are you talking about, comrade?

@snake si , they were pretty fascists

I love that baba is here

To destroy you lot

With facts and logic

@snake i dont hate any people in general

You fucking capitalist snowflakes

thats for low iq ethonats

Capitalism makes you soft

And weak

I’m not even a capitalist

Yea yea okay

There's a difference when an American kills an SS officer, however, @BabaBooey. The American is acting to terminate an initiator of force, while the Soviet is simply fighting to preserve his ability to subjugate the masses through force.

Capitalism makes you weak, socialism starves you
<:hypersmugon:544638648721604608>

Embrace third position

The third position is we kill all of them.

Communists, Socialists, and Fascists.

Fascism is the future honestly

Then, we go back to our regular deliberations and live out the remainder of our lives free.

🙂

@snake i doubt many will disagree here

All of this babbling about who is the moral good and economics is getting us no where

Yeah yeah

It's getting me somewhere

trust me , they have alot to say to leftists, but when it comes to admitted fascists, theyre crickets

hmmmmm

You’re just doing the whole horseshoe thing baba

Which is tiring

i wonder whyy

I'm raking in the dough while you guys fail to understand why capitalism rules all <:powerful:595334910764515338>

@snake horseshoe theory? nah fam

It isn't the future, because you'll simply negate it by eliminating creative destruction and inducing shortages, @snake.

>Generations of being taught about Nazi atrocities but nothing of the Soviets
>"But what about muh fascists?"
How retarded can you get?

Yep, you implied that the capitalists who are classical liberals would agree with the statement “fascism is the future” @BabaBooey

There's nothing futuristic about the inefficiency of systems which cannot allocate scarce resources efficiently.

@snake

To do so, it must be decentralized.

Individualism must be present.

“Creative destruction” is another way of saying destroying the working and middle class

@ubermensch why doesnt fascism work?

No, it isn't.

simply because it was defeated militarily ?

@BabaBooey that’s also retarded

@snake history has proven liberals will side with reaction more than they will with revolution

youre an idiot

Yeah if a factory moves from a town in Pennsylvania then a bunch of people are unemployed. Unless they magically get the money to move to Silicon Valley California and learn to code

Fuck that

why should machines take the jobs that a basket weaver could do

Awww, look at the pot calling the kettle black

>Famines
>Economic failure
>State-mandated executions and imprisonment
>Poor international relations
"Why doesn't fascism work?"

Creative destruction is another word for the never-ending and permanent state of innovation, always embraced, always integrated with human action, when it lessens the amount of scarce resources required for allocation to fulfill the same utility. It allows new markets to expand, along with it our quality of life. Creative destruction was moving from the scythe, to the combine; from ice harvesters, to the ice maker in your kitchen, because each of those innovations were more efficient at fulfilling the utility function of the former.

"It would've worked if it wasn't for those meddling individualists who want to make a good living!"

@BabaBooey

@BabaBooey god that’s such a moral fag position. Just because they might choose a side doesn’t mean they like it. It’s like I tell you to shoot yourself or to cut yourself and bleed out. You decide to shoot yourself to ease the pain, then I stand on your corpse and say “he’s pro gun violence!”

pffft, can't have people able to afford the very things they produce at the job, that's not right

@snake i dont care if they "like it" or not

i care about actions and their direct consequences

https://youtu.be/p7GPiX3anGg throwback I guess

@BabaBooey, I've got news for you. Classical Liberalism was and is the *only* real revolution.

Uh you’re assuming they have complete agency, in a violent revolution. Obviously they don’t

"If only everyone pulled together on the same rope we'd make great strides in society"
...
"Hey, comrade, where's the rope?"
"Sir, I'm terribly sorry. I ate it. I was hungry."
"LOOK AT THIS TRAITOR! TO THE GULAG WITH HIM!"

They have a very limited amount of options

Whatever

"Fuck the opinions of the plebs, I'll tell them what is or isn't a good action and consequence." -some faggot named Baba

It’s all so tiring and fucking retarded

So much moral fagging

And purity tests

Communism - when the gulags have gulags

gulag matryoshka doll

**Yo dawg, I heard you like gulags, so I put a gulag in your gulag so you can starve while you starve.**

get to work babushka

RUSSIAN NESTING GULAG

WITHIN EACH GULAG IS A SMALLER GULAG

See those Ukrainians? I want them to starve because 100,000 people ate an extra kilo of rice.

*Central Planning*

u get hardbass only 3 minutes per day, you can divide the time in increments through out day

In Baba's mind there's an end goal that is ultimately so good and superior to all other states of being that no means are too much to get to the ends.

Dude I’m all for a moral government that enforces morality but every time I’m shocked at the moral fagging that goes on

I thought I was supposed to be the Puritan

@snake if they are in direct contradiction to the liberation of the proletariat its irrelevant if you think they have "agency" or not

"What do you mean you're hungry? Fuck off, pig, the state will tell you when you're hungry!"

@BabaBooey this is your issue, you can’t see what they’re thinking. They completely disagree that you’re liberating anything at all

@snake i have yet to make a moral claim or argument 🤡

Rofl

It’s all very implied.

hunger is too selfish for mother russia, please redistribute fecal matter it goes down smoother second time

by "they" who are you referring to? counter revolutionaries?

“@snake if they are in direct contradiction to the liberation of the proletariat its irrelevant if you think they have "agency" or not” does this not have moral weight?

Isn't it a moral argument to say "fuck other people's opinions, I know which ideas are right. *

Come on!

@snake no, that is thinking dialectically

@ubermensch i mean you have sympathy for ss officers being shot too so....

@BabaBooey uh ok now I get you

Baba have you cleaned your room today?