media-and-other-lies
Discord ID: 511744803751329812
200 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 2/2
It might take care of a lot of degenerates, since they all have aids. Could be a boomer holocaust, too. We gotta solve our aging population crisis, goyim.
any of you niggers ever watch Murdoch Murdoch?
Yeah I stopped recently though
whys that?
Hahaha lol
Eyewitness Brianna Hendricks: "You're all going tโฆ: https://youtu.be/bITrNYzKdL0
Perhaps her husband was the shooter?
Or boyfriend or fuck buddy etc?
Damn Mexicans.
that whole shooting makes no sense why is there no camera footage
like at all
there is
it just all sucks because he was shooting from like a mile away
It was in a hotel right
3 hotels.
Needed gear:
Primary Firearm:
AK or AR preferred.
Semi auto slug gun or sks will get the job done.
Bolt action rifle insufficient but will kill.
Secondary Firearm:
Full size 9s and 45s preferred.
Compacts and revolvers will suffice
Anything less not recommended but it's better then nothing.
Trauma medkit very necessary:
Water:
Bottled preferred
Filters necessary
Iodine tablets necessary
Food:
MREs recommended (you can build your own)
Fiber pills recommended
Mess kit recommended
Communication devices:
Burner phone recommended
Long range dual band transceiver necessary headset and push to talk recommended as well.
2-3 knives recommended:
Bare minimum one fixed blade
Suggested 1 folding and 1 multitool
Recommended gear:
Camo uniforms:
Atac, kryptec or other gen 3 camps preferred.
Digitalals, flecktarn, woodland and mossy oak will definitely work well.
Solid colors not preferred.
Plate carrier and armor:
Level 3+ should be bare minimum but anything less is better then nothing.
Backpack: 20 liter or higher depending on gear
Beneficial gear:
Alt Centrism?
<:Whaaat:583867968824410133>
basically a healthy combo of right wing death squads and genuinely big brain optics
That still makes no sense
gun control + no people control = commiefornia
gun control + people control = orwells wet dream
no gun control + no people control = ancapistan
no gun control + individual people control = 'MERICA
(No gun control + collective people control = switzerland idfk)
Hate to break it to ya but your equations are heavily incorrect
Both in the historical sense and the mathematical sense
well first off this isnt math, and second off this isnt history; this is an assessment of the way things are; gun stats in the US outside of inner cities will back this up
You have failed on that front as well
id love to see how
To an amazing amount
Well if I were to start from the top
Somalia does have people control in the form of regional and tribal governments (btw this is the case in both Puntland and Somaliland) and California isnโt exactly a shooting gallery
In regards to โindividual people controlโ that pretty much not the US right now on the large scale this is shown by the fact that we currently have a pretty large hand in the violent shooting ring
Also we are hosting the School Shooting Olympics 22 years in a row
Thatโs just the surface of it
The only things you can say you are right about are the ancapistan part
Since Orwell was mostly concerned with the fact that people are both incapable or unwilling to stop creating systems to box them in
Not really a gun control thing
well either way id bet the orwellian dictators wouldnt fancy gun rights
They donโt fancy rights altogether
let alone any but to clarify I meant the fact that "individuals" I would imagine as (the majority of) gun owners that dont play pumped up kicks every time they get bullied and go on a shooting spree and actually respect their weapon enough to use it only when they would need to (for self defense against an authoritarian govt etc)
besides the fact that those trying to push for gun control miss the fact that the authorities often times stage drills in areas not long before a supposed "event" occurs too...
and even if those events are real; is banning guns really gonna stop someone hellbent on hurting someone else? europe deals with every other type of violence yet doesnt go around banning trucks and (at least the majority of) kitchen utensils ffs
if I were to presuppose why it is its because humanists and those that want to rid humanity of all their responsibility and objectivity through SJW doctrine (in their vain attempts to make a need for a savior obsolete) dont wanna admit the fact that people are capable as just as much evil as they are good, and we have a class of dishonest narccisists that want to indoctrinate the world on the basis of liberal tenets (one of those being that humanity is somehow intrinsically good, regardless of wheter nature depicts this, hence why they try so hard to censor and hide whats real)
First off Iโd like to ask you what you think gun control is
laws or restrictions on the right to bear arms
what are ethical restrictions then
Thatโs pretty broad and dodging with an outright condemnation makes me think you donโt know what actual gun control is
well if it isnt a means of usurping individual rights to defend oneself in a public setting I guess I dont
Iโm not talking about gun grabbers btw
Actually most gun control has to do with things like better background checks and better safety procedures
Like 90% of it is that
yet id bet they wouldnt bother with background checking politicians for ties to the same forces they pretend to "rally the people" against, its pathetic watching the charade and responsibility shifting really
Again you dodge to another party
really? because I thought we were talking about the need for background checks...
This has nothing to do with politicians
Iโm talking about legislation regarding gun control
and thats fine but at the end of the day its just paper with fancy writing on it made by elitists that probably care about their paychecks and power more than they do children's well being unequivocally
legitimized by threat of force upon non complicance like the protection racket it really truly is
What does that have to do with what Iโm talking about
What warped sense of linear logic do you think your pulling off
my point is I dont see it wise to put my well being and the well being of people I love into the hands of laws that can be changed and amended to suit the aims of those that would see them dead... and you shouldn't either
besides the fact that values etc do way more to influence people and things more than one would imagine... scared me at first but im not even surprised at all anymore
So you believe that words do more than words
since when are intentionalistically held values merely words?
When you tell somebody your values are they not words
And also what are laws except written values
in the functional sense yes, but insofar as them being quantum probabilities (which exist as energy waveforms, as they have been proven to be by empirical science) id think not...
From what I can see I doubt you understand the idea of wave functions (also because in this context it doesnโt make any sense here since this about ethics and not physics ) but Iโll bite
you dont have to, I guess its just my opinion but if the quantum world precipitated the physical world and not the other way around it would make sense of a lot more than people are willing to to say the least
why do your arguments always turn into this retarded bullshit
You do realize that the โquantum worldโ is within the physical world
highly unlikely that this experiment concludes an imminent universal origin but as good of a presupposition as yours
Also I do agree that this metaphysics shit is pretty.... well shit
@ThatPreciseBloke the โquantum worldโ is literally the smallest **physical** thing
yes where "reality" as we understand it practically ceases to exist; "why" is the question
It doesnโt cease to exist
never said it did, but the interference pattern made by electrons as the default actions on part of those actions suggests that matter acts as a wave (energy) as supposed to particulates (matter)
If you define reality as Newtonian physics then I have some pretty bad news for ya
not purely but go on...
If youโre not defining it like that then why say โwhere โrealityโ as we understand it practically ceases to exist;โ
because by any sort of empirical observation "reality" is (at first glance) an unmoving continuum as defined by natural and/plus universal law, which includes ones that define physical processes...
Itโs almost like observing the world at a macro level doesnโt give you an in-depth view of how things really work
Next youโre gonna say reality breaks down at the cellular level because of the Krebs Cycle
nice presupposition but id think im at least smart enough to not know cells are x^100 number of times bigger than anything quantum or even atomic (and thus from a material POV, already were "probabilized" into existance, at the quantum level) but k den
Combine that witht the fact that the universe ostensibly originated from a very very small point and you have no less than a definitive, scientifically backed idealism
This
This is amazing
im sure it is ๐
*HuRr DuRr GeNe EdItInG aNd GmO iS nEaRlY FoOlPrOoF AnD nOt dAnGeRoUs*
I donโt think anyone says that
Youd be surprised lol
Not really
Itโs common knowledge that fucking with things we donโt fully understand will cause issue
I mean id hope it would be but in skeptical as to whether common knolwedge is really as common as it should be... Idk
Well thatโs relative to the group who actually delves into this topic
As most people donโt know what CRISPR is
200 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 2/2