media-and-other-lies

Discord ID: 511744803751329812


200 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev | Page 2/2

2020-01-31 07:01:37 UTC

It might take care of a lot of degenerates, since they all have aids. Could be a boomer holocaust, too. We gotta solve our aging population crisis, goyim.

2020-02-01 01:17:41 UTC

any of you niggers ever watch Murdoch Murdoch?

2020-02-01 03:22:11 UTC

Yeah I stopped recently though

2020-02-01 06:05:29 UTC

whys that?

2020-02-01 08:42:49 UTC

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/511744803751329812/673085840204759050/image0-52.png

2020-02-06 03:00:27 UTC

Hahaha lol

2020-02-06 15:00:15 UTC

Eyewitness Brianna Hendricks: "You're all going tโ€ฆ: https://youtu.be/bITrNYzKdL0

2020-02-06 18:17:26 UTC

Perhaps her husband was the shooter?

2020-02-06 18:17:49 UTC

Or boyfriend or fuck buddy etc?

2020-02-06 21:17:39 UTC

Damn Mexicans.

2020-02-07 02:10:12 UTC

that whole shooting makes no sense why is there no camera footage

2020-02-07 02:10:15 UTC

like at all

2020-02-07 06:59:16 UTC

there is

2020-02-07 06:59:39 UTC

it just all sucks because he was shooting from like a mile away

2020-02-07 13:09:11 UTC

It was in a hotel right

2020-02-07 14:45:33 UTC

3 hotels.

2020-02-18 06:48:19 UTC

Needed gear:
Primary Firearm:
AK or AR preferred.
Semi auto slug gun or sks will get the job done.
Bolt action rifle insufficient but will kill.
Secondary Firearm:
Full size 9s and 45s preferred.
Compacts and revolvers will suffice
Anything less not recommended but it's better then nothing.
Trauma medkit very necessary:
Water:
Bottled preferred
Filters necessary
Iodine tablets necessary
Food:
MREs recommended (you can build your own)
Fiber pills recommended
Mess kit recommended
Communication devices:
Burner phone recommended
Long range dual band transceiver necessary headset and push to talk recommended as well.
2-3 knives recommended:
Bare minimum one fixed blade
Suggested 1 folding and 1 multitool
Recommended gear:
Camo uniforms:
Atac, kryptec or other gen 3 camps preferred.
Digitalals, flecktarn, woodland and mossy oak will definitely work well.
Solid colors not preferred.
Plate carrier and armor:
Level 3+ should be bare minimum but anything less is better then nothing.
Backpack: 20 liter or higher depending on gear
Beneficial gear:

2020-02-21 00:41:53 UTC

Alt Centrism?

2020-02-21 00:41:57 UTC

<:Whaaat:583867968824410133>

2020-02-21 01:57:56 UTC

basically a healthy combo of right wing death squads and genuinely big brain optics

2020-02-21 03:25:51 UTC

That still makes no sense

2020-02-27 00:58:20 UTC

gun control + no people control = commiefornia
gun control + people control = orwells wet dream
no gun control + no people control = ancapistan
no gun control + individual people control = 'MERICA

2020-02-27 02:38:52 UTC

(No gun control + collective people control = switzerland idfk)

2020-02-27 04:03:48 UTC

Hate to break it to ya but your equations are heavily incorrect

2020-02-27 04:04:15 UTC

Both in the historical sense and the mathematical sense

2020-02-27 04:18:48 UTC

well first off this isnt math, and second off this isnt history; this is an assessment of the way things are; gun stats in the US outside of inner cities will back this up

2020-02-27 04:19:30 UTC

You have failed on that front as well

2020-02-27 04:19:38 UTC

id love to see how

2020-02-27 04:19:39 UTC

To an amazing amount

2020-02-27 04:25:32 UTC

Well if I were to start from the top
Somalia does have people control in the form of regional and tribal governments (btw this is the case in both Puntland and Somaliland) and California isnโ€™t exactly a shooting gallery
In regards to โ€˜individual people controlโ€™ that pretty much not the US right now on the large scale this is shown by the fact that we currently have a pretty large hand in the violent shooting ring
Also we are hosting the School Shooting Olympics 22 years in a row

2020-02-27 04:25:46 UTC

Thatโ€™s just the surface of it

2020-02-27 04:26:12 UTC

The only things you can say you are right about are the ancapistan part

2020-02-27 04:27:00 UTC

Since Orwell was mostly concerned with the fact that people are both incapable or unwilling to stop creating systems to box them in

2020-02-27 04:27:12 UTC

Not really a gun control thing

2020-02-27 04:27:30 UTC

well either way id bet the orwellian dictators wouldnt fancy gun rights

2020-02-27 04:27:55 UTC

They donโ€™t fancy rights altogether

2020-02-27 04:31:01 UTC

let alone any but to clarify I meant the fact that "individuals" I would imagine as (the majority of) gun owners that dont play pumped up kicks every time they get bullied and go on a shooting spree and actually respect their weapon enough to use it only when they would need to (for self defense against an authoritarian govt etc)

besides the fact that those trying to push for gun control miss the fact that the authorities often times stage drills in areas not long before a supposed "event" occurs too...

and even if those events are real; is banning guns really gonna stop someone hellbent on hurting someone else? europe deals with every other type of violence yet doesnt go around banning trucks and (at least the majority of) kitchen utensils ffs

2020-02-27 04:32:03 UTC

if I were to presuppose why it is its because humanists and those that want to rid humanity of all their responsibility and objectivity through SJW doctrine (in their vain attempts to make a need for a savior obsolete) dont wanna admit the fact that people are capable as just as much evil as they are good, and we have a class of dishonest narccisists that want to indoctrinate the world on the basis of liberal tenets (one of those being that humanity is somehow intrinsically good, regardless of wheter nature depicts this, hence why they try so hard to censor and hide whats real)

2020-02-27 04:32:07 UTC

First off Iโ€™d like to ask you what you think gun control is

2020-02-27 04:32:31 UTC

laws or restrictions on the right to bear arms

2020-02-27 04:33:15 UTC

what are ethical restrictions then

2020-02-27 04:33:34 UTC

Thatโ€™s pretty broad and dodging with an outright condemnation makes me think you donโ€™t know what actual gun control is

2020-02-27 04:34:29 UTC

well if it isnt a means of usurping individual rights to defend oneself in a public setting I guess I dont

2020-02-27 04:34:29 UTC

Iโ€™m not talking about gun grabbers btw

2020-02-27 04:35:44 UTC

Actually most gun control has to do with things like better background checks and better safety procedures

2020-02-27 04:35:55 UTC

Like 90% of it is that

2020-02-27 04:36:46 UTC

yet id bet they wouldnt bother with background checking politicians for ties to the same forces they pretend to "rally the people" against, its pathetic watching the charade and responsibility shifting really

2020-02-27 04:37:12 UTC

Again you dodge to another party

2020-02-27 04:37:31 UTC

really? because I thought we were talking about the need for background checks...

2020-02-27 04:37:42 UTC

This has nothing to do with politicians

2020-02-27 04:38:08 UTC

Iโ€™m talking about legislation regarding gun control

2020-02-27 04:39:38 UTC

and thats fine but at the end of the day its just paper with fancy writing on it made by elitists that probably care about their paychecks and power more than they do children's well being unequivocally

2020-02-27 04:40:03 UTC

legitimized by threat of force upon non complicance like the protection racket it really truly is

2020-02-27 04:40:08 UTC

What does that have to do with what Iโ€™m talking about

2020-02-27 04:40:57 UTC

What warped sense of linear logic do you think your pulling off

2020-02-27 04:41:16 UTC

my point is I dont see it wise to put my well being and the well being of people I love into the hands of laws that can be changed and amended to suit the aims of those that would see them dead... and you shouldn't either

2020-02-27 04:42:11 UTC

besides the fact that values etc do way more to influence people and things more than one would imagine... scared me at first but im not even surprised at all anymore

2020-02-27 04:43:21 UTC

So you believe that words do more than words

2020-02-27 04:43:47 UTC

since when are intentionalistically held values merely words?

2020-02-27 04:44:38 UTC

When you tell somebody your values are they not words

2020-02-27 04:45:02 UTC

And also what are laws except written values

2020-02-27 04:45:11 UTC

in the functional sense yes, but insofar as them being quantum probabilities (which exist as energy waveforms, as they have been proven to be by empirical science) id think not...

2020-02-27 04:49:25 UTC

From what I can see I doubt you understand the idea of wave functions (also because in this context it doesnโ€™t make any sense here since this about ethics and not physics ) but Iโ€™ll bite

2020-02-27 04:51:18 UTC

you dont have to, I guess its just my opinion but if the quantum world precipitated the physical world and not the other way around it would make sense of a lot more than people are willing to to say the least

2020-02-27 04:52:26 UTC

why do your arguments always turn into this retarded bullshit

2020-02-27 04:52:44 UTC

You do realize that the โ€œquantum worldโ€ is within the physical world

2020-02-27 04:53:35 UTC

highly unlikely that this experiment concludes an imminent universal origin but as good of a presupposition as yours

2020-02-27 04:53:38 UTC

Also I do agree that this metaphysics shit is pretty.... well shit

2020-02-27 04:54:43 UTC

@ThatPreciseBloke the โ€œquantum worldโ€ is literally the smallest **physical** thing

2020-02-27 04:55:34 UTC

yes where "reality" as we understand it practically ceases to exist; "why" is the question

2020-02-27 04:55:47 UTC

It doesnโ€™t cease to exist

2020-02-27 04:56:52 UTC

never said it did, but the interference pattern made by electrons as the default actions on part of those actions suggests that matter acts as a wave (energy) as supposed to particulates (matter)

2020-02-27 04:57:15 UTC

If you define reality as Newtonian physics then I have some pretty bad news for ya

2020-02-27 04:58:25 UTC

not purely but go on...

2020-02-27 04:59:57 UTC

If youโ€™re not defining it like that then why say โ€œwhere โ€˜realityโ€™ as we understand it practically ceases to exist;โ€

2020-02-27 05:00:54 UTC

because by any sort of empirical observation "reality" is (at first glance) an unmoving continuum as defined by natural and/plus universal law, which includes ones that define physical processes...

2020-02-27 05:02:13 UTC

Itโ€™s almost like observing the world at a macro level doesnโ€™t give you an in-depth view of how things really work

2020-02-27 05:02:54 UTC

Next youโ€™re gonna say reality breaks down at the cellular level because of the Krebs Cycle

2020-02-27 05:03:45 UTC

nice presupposition but id think im at least smart enough to not know cells are x^100 number of times bigger than anything quantum or even atomic (and thus from a material POV, already were "probabilized" into existance, at the quantum level) but k den

Combine that witht the fact that the universe ostensibly originated from a very very small point and you have no less than a definitive, scientifically backed idealism

2020-02-27 05:04:06 UTC

This

2020-02-27 05:04:10 UTC

This is amazing

2020-02-27 05:05:05 UTC

im sure it is ๐Ÿ™ƒ

2020-02-27 22:10:58 UTC

*HuRr DuRr GeNe EdItInG aNd GmO iS nEaRlY FoOlPrOoF AnD nOt dAnGeRoUs*

2020-02-27 22:11:24 UTC

I donโ€™t think anyone says that

2020-02-27 22:12:10 UTC

Youd be surprised lol

2020-02-27 22:12:51 UTC

Not really
Itโ€™s common knowledge that fucking with things we donโ€™t fully understand will cause issue

2020-02-27 22:14:13 UTC

I mean id hope it would be but in skeptical as to whether common knolwedge is really as common as it should be... Idk

2020-02-27 22:15:33 UTC

Well thatโ€™s relative to the group who actually delves into this topic

2020-02-27 22:15:59 UTC

As most people donโ€™t know what CRISPR is

200 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev | Page 2/2