The FBI already said no.

^

that too

Michael Knowles eviscerated Ford on his show last night, it was pretty great to watch

Its like asking the FBI to find something in the ocean but not telling them what they're looking for.

*not TO her, but just in general on his show

"[Therapists] exaggerate the importance of some events, and downplay the importance of others. They trim the facts to fit their theory. and they convince their clients they were sexually abused---if they could only remember. And then they start to accuse. And sometimes what they remember never happened, and the people accused are innocent. The good news? At least the therapist's theory remains intact."

And also tell them to look in an area the size of colorado

using only sea floor scans that are 30 years old

the episode of his show was "I Don't Believe Her", to boot 😂

We've seen plenty of evidence in title 9 that events with clear evidence of not rape and the women gets convinced that a rape did happen.

you mean uhhh.... what's his face on daily wire

not klavin and not shaprio

knowles

michael knowles

yes

the always-trumper on the Daily Wire

mmm

the execrable Michael Knowles

i'm not too big a fan of him compared to klavin and shaprio

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Would you guys mind reading my reply?

He's too smug for me sometimes

If you got the time?

I used to be shaky on him, but after seeing him debate, he has earned my respect. he's like a notch away from Shapiro's level of beasthood

lol

@Mongo Jongo post!post!post!post!post!post!post!

"I think that that's a McCarthyism from the democratic party line. "If you're not an X, just submit to our investigation to clear your name."
And it's not just Ford's friend and Therapist. "I believe her because we're friends" is actually a pretty important distinction from "Yes, I corroborate that she and I were at this same party, and she acted like a victim of assault on the night of X at Y, and she got a ride from Z who can also corroborate."
Her therapist under affidavit swore that Dr. Ford did not mention Kavanaugh's name.
There were two others that Dr. Ford said were there, and they said that they can't confirm they were there.
That's 0 for 4.

I think an FBI investigation would be great, if A: They had something to go on. With the information given by Dr. Ford, there's literally nothing they can investigate. They don't have an exact year, a location of the party, and the people who were there, can't say that they were.
That's huge.

The reason why I'm on the fence, is that Kavanaugh is still trying to provide evidence, sourcing journal entries going back 30 years consistently. Accompanied with calendars. That's huge if we see that.

It's a courtesy that I'd grant you my friend if a woman alleged that you raped her in highschool. Now you can say, "But that would never happen to me." But it's not unheard of. And that's why we have innocent until proven guilty.

Also, sorry about responding in two parts, but when you responded to two comments, it made it harder to get all my points out."

You aren't on the fence lol, you should be falling over the fence holding onto it for dear life

I live in the most liberal part of Utah

So if I want to keep working I have to pretend to be on the fence

damn

sorry bro

i have 0 social media presence

so i'm off the grid

you're a damn brave man

hue hue

That's what I need to do. That off the grid life.

I dont think I could keep my shit together

This is pretty much my social media presence.

i never made a twitter

never made a facebook

Same, no twitter, no facebook

I would even advise caution on defending kavanaugh at all if the workplace has access to your post

^

^

Well, I'm a massage therapist.

don't even bother reading the details of your employment

So my work is just finding clients.

they'll find a way to fire you if they want

It would be damn hard for me to hold my tongue, that's for sure. I'm a little like Blonde in that I just have to say shit sometimes when people are vomiting cancerous rhetoric/shitting on important values

Yeah same.

I voted for Ron Paul in 2012, and got blasted by everyone I knew.

How important is it to argue with this person? Is there even a chance they'll change their mind? What would their answer be to: What evidence is required to change your mind? I suspect no evidence would change this person mind, or the required evidence to change this persons mind could never be produced (video of Kavanugh that entire year)?

personally i wouldn't even bother

if it's just someone online

who gives a damn if you change their mind

if it ends up with you fucking your life over

^

now, if he had free reign i'd say go for it

but if he's worried that he's going to get bit in the ass

I changed his mind that the old testament is badass and he's a hardcore atheist.

don't even bother

So I've made progress before.

But that was like 2 years ago.

But you guys probably have a point.

He could be totally different now.

It's actually interesting talking to atheists who value the bible

I only try to convince people I interact with IRL, since they matter.

they have their own personal reasons why they don't particularly believe, but recognize atheism leads ultimately to incoherence

Or maybe I should say I only try to convince people IRL that do matter to me.

Aye.

I did a deep study of world religions, and I have a very deep knowledge of the bible, and a lot of the translations, (not a brag, just background for this story). So, we were able to discuss in depth some of his issues with some of the harsh shit in Deuteronomy and numbers.

Nice!

Yeah, so that's why I had this conversation in the first place.

It's just a shame. Because 100% of all of my friends are hardcore liberal. So whereas a few years ago, it wasn't a big deal, now it's like, I know how it feels to be a closeted gay man.

LOL

well, consider yourself among the proverbial fags of the web

#pride

Haha

I felt the same in college. I wasn't even to the right, but the left was oppressive on campus I was well aware that saying the wrong thing had consequences.

Yeah, that's the worst.

I feel like, whatever happens with my computer networking degree, I'll end up working for some company on the right. I'm way too invested in this shit, I'd really like working on a tech team for a place like the Daily Wire, or Rebel Media, or similar

Lucky me. I live in the south.

Heart of Dixie. Lol

Yeah, tech is a good industry if you want to have options politically. Since everybody needs tech help. Especially with Networking stuff.

The engineering side of where I went to school didn't give a damn about politics, because we were too busy talking shit on the PolySci majors. Then I joined the military, and no one gives a damn about politics where I am.

Nice

What do y’all think about Reuters as a news source?

It's fine most of the time

But nobody's fine 100% of the time, so it's k

@RoadtoDawn I’m glad my employer doesn’t care what I post.

Ok. Cool. I generally think the same. I just want to know what others think

@Buddha23Fett noice

I want to work for any company that has right leaning votes, so nothing will ever matter

Views not votes

I love it. I mean I still make an effort to keep them out of it so they don’t get shit.

@RoadtoDawn become Matt’s producer. Lol

LOL that's an idea

I offered once