This actually reminds me of a section of 12 Rules for Life

What does the person think the FBI is going to do?

Stall the confirmation <:PandaPancky:345073282682191873>

I actually mentioned that to the dude I was debating last night. If this happened 1 year ago, 5 years, maybe as far as 10 years ago, people wouldn't lend themselves much doubt in considering its credibility.

There's only so much 'ambiguity' i can handle before shit becomes bullshit

It would be a 100% certainty in most people's eyes

Yeah this shit smells so bad

The FBI already said no.

^

that too

Michael Knowles eviscerated Ford on his show last night, it was pretty great to watch

Its like asking the FBI to find something in the ocean but not telling them what they're looking for.

*not TO her, but just in general on his show

"[Therapists] exaggerate the importance of some events, and downplay the importance of others. They trim the facts to fit their theory. and they convince their clients they were sexually abused---if they could only remember. And then they start to accuse. And sometimes what they remember never happened, and the people accused are innocent. The good news? At least the therapist's theory remains intact."

And also tell them to look in an area the size of colorado

using only sea floor scans that are 30 years old

the episode of his show was "I Don't Believe Her", to boot 😂

We've seen plenty of evidence in title 9 that events with clear evidence of not rape and the women gets convinced that a rape did happen.

you mean uhhh.... what's his face on daily wire

not klavin and not shaprio

knowles

michael knowles

yes

the always-trumper on the Daily Wire

mmm

the execrable Michael Knowles

i'm not too big a fan of him compared to klavin and shaprio

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Would you guys mind reading my reply?

He's too smug for me sometimes

If you got the time?

I used to be shaky on him, but after seeing him debate, he has earned my respect. he's like a notch away from Shapiro's level of beasthood

lol

@Mongo Jongo post!post!post!post!post!post!post!

"I think that that's a McCarthyism from the democratic party line. "If you're not an X, just submit to our investigation to clear your name."
And it's not just Ford's friend and Therapist. "I believe her because we're friends" is actually a pretty important distinction from "Yes, I corroborate that she and I were at this same party, and she acted like a victim of assault on the night of X at Y, and she got a ride from Z who can also corroborate."
Her therapist under affidavit swore that Dr. Ford did not mention Kavanaugh's name.
There were two others that Dr. Ford said were there, and they said that they can't confirm they were there.
That's 0 for 4.

I think an FBI investigation would be great, if A: They had something to go on. With the information given by Dr. Ford, there's literally nothing they can investigate. They don't have an exact year, a location of the party, and the people who were there, can't say that they were.
That's huge.

The reason why I'm on the fence, is that Kavanaugh is still trying to provide evidence, sourcing journal entries going back 30 years consistently. Accompanied with calendars. That's huge if we see that.

It's a courtesy that I'd grant you my friend if a woman alleged that you raped her in highschool. Now you can say, "But that would never happen to me." But it's not unheard of. And that's why we have innocent until proven guilty.

Also, sorry about responding in two parts, but when you responded to two comments, it made it harder to get all my points out."

You aren't on the fence lol, you should be falling over the fence holding onto it for dear life

I live in the most liberal part of Utah

So if I want to keep working I have to pretend to be on the fence

damn

sorry bro

i have 0 social media presence