voice-chat
Discord ID: 628013859776626711
12,940 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 24/52
| Next
Woah shit, server's alive. Just in time for me to have to leave <:pepehands:644890202304937994>
lol
<@591273450325409792>
๐
@Sasha tagged the wrong person
Don't think i did
you did
Who do you think i was trying to tag?
Venus
but i didnt
I meant to tag venny
?jail @Bully
?ban @Bully
@Castore what opioids?
@Master, remember the Athenians. https://www.nber.org/papers/w26500 ''Despite the importance of the opioid crisis and the desire to understand its origins, there
is little empirical work exploring its initial causes. We study the effects of the introduction of
OxyContin in 1996, exploiting early variation in its promotion and market entry based on preexisting state policies known as triplicate prescription programs. These state policies were
adopted decades earlier and became outdated soon after OxyContin's launch. However, their
initial deterrence of OxyContin promotion and use had long-term effects on overdoses in these
states, dramatically decreasing overdose death rates even today.
Our results imply striking differences throughout the opioid crisis stemming from
variation in initial policy conditions. '' ,
''We use our results to provide a back-of-the-envelope calculation of how much of the
dramatic growth in drug overdose deaths can be accounted for by the introduction and marketing
of OxyContin. On average, the national drug overdose death rate increased by 6.89 deaths per
100,000 since 1996, comparing the mean during the 1996-2017 time period (11.33 deaths per
100,000) relative to the 1991-1995 baseline mean (4.44). The additional exposure to
OxyContinโs launch and marketing for non-triplicate states led to 4.49 more deaths per 100,000,
which is equivalent to 65% (4.49/6.89) of the national growth in overdose death rates since
1996. As an additional benchmarking exercise, we consider the additional deaths that could be
attributed to an increase in initial OxyContin exposure moving from no exposure to the national
level of exposure. To make this calculation, we need to scale our mortality results by the
difference in OxyContin exposure between non-triplicate and triplicate states.66 This
extrapolation suggests that moving from no OxyContin exposure to the national average would
lead to 5.56 more deaths per 100,000, which is 81% of the rise in the overdose death rate since
1996. We note that this extrapolation is far out-of-sample since no part of the United States was
unexposed, so we interpret it with caution. However, these calculations suggest that exposure to
OxyContin may explain a large share of the growth in drug overdose deaths since the mid-1990s. ''
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/373119138689974273/651477636568317962/unknown.png
I read somewhere that opioids effect the ventrolateral and orbitiofrontal prefrontal cortexes.
Something to do with chronic overstimulaton
@Master, remember the Athenians. this is what eplains the opioid crisis specifically overdose death rates
kk
Hello
look at this cringe
@Deleted User are we playing halo?
Pp
fries and onion rings @Sjruruchunchun @Summer~ ๐
not outloud to eat in here
sdfsdf
@ใ๏ผณ๏ฝ๏ฝ๏ฝ๏ฝ๏ฝ๏ฝ ๏ฝ ๏ฝ๏ผ๏ฝ๏ฝ๏ฝใ< howdy socradeez's brother
Hey guys
<:ComfyAYA:498637155984212018>
<:transuwu:651464997410570261>
I love judge dredd
**I FUCKING LOVE IT**
it's like
based
oh yea forgot metaphysicians used to be heavily criticised by hegel and marx for it's stationaryness
Sanrikuza gang UwU
say no to narita!!!
@Deleted User how mad are you that we cant get past premise 1 <a:PepeLaughter:642066215233388544>
What in the fuck
I'm intuiting this one out of existence
?
You heard me
Kant gang
im confused
lol
@Hagar Socrates is a man, all men are mortal, therefore Socrates is mortal
Silly
Or you'll see people usually formatting it like this:
Socrates is a man
all men are mortal
Therefore Socrates is mortal
lol
@AusFox get in here
wereplaying
@Deleted User nah im good. Maybe another time if fondboy is on.
@STLdaddy can you pop in vc
@kalo Yo what's up Kalo!
did i come too late
Yes
We're going to bed
@kalo yea I did
Based af
@Deleted User Blastoise, Paras, Alakazam, Feraligatr, Aggron, Kricketune
I wanna get educated ๐
"Thus Australia, unlike the United States, did not embark on a significant Keynesian program of spending to recover from the Depression. Nevertheless, the Australian recovery began around 1932. Australians took consolation from sporting achievements through the Depression, with cricketer Don Bradman and race horse Phar Lap achieving long-lasting fame. "
how does the economic collapse work
For a multitude of reasons but itโs anything thatโs causes macroeconomic factors to differ significantly from expected values leading to mechanisms ceasing to function normally.
Idk it randomly came up and I'm too lazy to leave discord to look up a random economic article
Oh thatโs fine
@Deleted User I love you
c-
I like it
post more please
@Rise Again my ideal society uwu
source this character
?help
.p 20 minute
.p skip
.skip
.skip
.skip
.q
.skip
.skip
.p baby birkin
.p baby birkin gunna
You debate philosophy?
we do
Which branch?
right now?
philosophy of mind i guess
No which branch of philosophy do you guys debate
we're not bound to a specific branch
K
religion, language, mind i guess
I can't do any of those RIP but wdym by language?
philosophy of language
Stop pinging me
Linguistics?
@Sasha what even is philosophy of language? I don't have much experience in philosophy
the nature of language for example
Imma Google that give me a sec
problems certain intuitions about language generate
Ok
Any ethics or morals done her
Here?
yes
o yeah
Ok maybe I'll take that on once I get better
i guess thats one of the more common philosophy topics
Yrp
Yep
It's simpler to learn but harder to debate
When your trying to explain morals and values it's really difficult
Is the search bar broken for anyone else or just me?
kind/#:~:targetText=Philosophy%20refers%20to%20such%20categories,naturally%20occurring%20stuff%20or%20objects
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brute_fact
https://www.iep.utm.edu/causal-e/
@Sasha
Premise: A is a B
Premise: A is also a C
Conclusion: Therefore, all Bs are Cs
@Marcdoof @Deleted User goodys fries are better
@AusFox is this your game
@Deleted User Angry emoji
lol
Come
Were did Macho go?
got triggeed i wouldnt let him hin the left wing part of the server
and left
WHy did you not let him into left part?
He got censured by you then?
how is not allowing you into the left wing section censoring you?
and i didnt let him because he doesnt fit the criterion
how is censoring half the server away from you censorship:P
imagine that take unironically
im nor preventing you from saying anything
If you take away his right to to take part and learn then its censure
he never had the right to begin with
you are preventing me from seeing stuff
yeah because they dont want you to see it lol
and you took away my right <:P
they dont like you
How is he gonna learn and debate and understand if he is inw rong
If he can't even get access
you never had the right
you debate here
I was here before the agorians came in
the falgsc section was never for you to begin with
DO I have access there?
if you want to debate you can debate in agora
the falgsc section is not for debating rightoids
0 IQ take
why should i let you in ?
because you need info from poeple with brains
Meth.. do I ahve access?
i dont really consider you to be a good source of info
12,940 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 24/52
| Next