its become a step above neo conservativsm basically

I haven't heard anything of atomwaffen in a few years, what happened to them

gone underground mainly

they are still active though

Ic

Fbi beaned them

got a few contacts with them

theyve gotten rid of the satanic/islamist elements

at least in some cells

Bruh there were some cringe attomwaffen groups i read about

no the feds didnt get them

they got destroyed because they compromised on islam and satanism

which corrupted their core values

and degraded them

which is EXACTLY why zero tolerance is a thing

Compromise to allow them into your group and compromising to work together are two separate things

which AWD did both

Which is why they collapsed so don’t do what they did and only compromise to work together towards a common goal

allowed them to infiltrate and influence Devon, a AWD member and he killed two of his brothers in arms

because they did not accept islam

because they kept to their values

and did not compromise

THAT

is why zero tolerance is a thing

because to do so otherwise

is to bring death

and destruction

Lmao

Again enjoy obscurity

like i said, i will not work with those who have a different worldview

@AlexTheLad217 being underground is the point

a revolutionary group does not parade around and go public about themselves

like i said

we are not a mass movement

we do not care what lemmings think

you call yourself a reactionary and yet you so far have done nothing to convince me you are not a system pig, totally supportive of the current world and all of its unnnaturalness

All I’ve advised is that an underground movement will never, ever, achieve any degree of meaningful success in enacting reactionary or revolutionary change.

It's possible

Just need

By the very nature of being underground you lack the capability to continually exert force to change the current system

Action

Guess the viet cong just lacked the ability to fight

Sporadic bombings and attacks have no long term affect vs the institutional power of the status quo

The viet cong had a physical nation to support them and join into once they defeated the south vietnamese

The status quo will never change, the goal is to bring the nation into a revolutionary state in order to gain power and take control

You will need to go from an underground state to a traditional organization if you hope to keep the power you gain

^

exactly that crab, im seeking a total end to the current america

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/612939590218547210/634915124842332180/1497579544995.jpg @Veraien

This

and making a totally new and organic entity to come from its ashes

liek a phoenix

@Deleted User absolutely this

Literally going to destroy the white race with that lmao

How

how

Bruh moment

do you know what will destroy us further?

Many whites would be destroyed

(((Whites)))

supporting a state that imports millions of non whites and actively condems whites

hmmmm

Destroy the system that whites exist in so it can be exploited by the rest of the world in its weakened state

hmmm

Ha

Exist for now

replaced in a decade

your implying that the entire world isnt dependent on us

Exactly

As if the rest of the world would stand by

break one link of the chain and the rest will follow suit

And let you people build up your ethno state

@AlexTheLad217 as if they have the ability to intervene

without american dollars europe is unable to do anything

neither are the vast majority of nations

If you’re destroying the system yeah they’ll have the capability/we won’t have the power to deny them

except maybe china or russia

Literally uneducated

In the state of the world

Let alone we cannot even stop migrants from latin america how would we stop them during a collapse

american money literally finances the entire European military forces

Factually incorrect

Lmao

I’m not arguing with someone who says shit like america is the only reason nato can exist

To deny the military potential of europe is first grade level of knowledge of the current world

european nations fund their own nations somewhat

but the vast majoirty of their defense is with our money

over 75% at least

in some cases

Because they haven’t had to for 30 years now and we’ve seen massive increases in spending over the past five years as soon as a possible threat emerges in russia

That’s all I will say for tonight

Gn I’m tired

Gn lad

norway increased their budget from 6 billion to almost 8 billion

thats hardly a difference when we spend over 700 billion on our military

Ye

And most tax goes to military

imagine if 600 billion were to stop being funnled into NATO

it would complely stop the militarys of NATO that didnt already fund their own militarys like Turkey does