we now live in a world where i could see two kids playing in the street and out of concern go to the mother and say, "You should REALLY get your kids out the street before then get hit by a car" and the woman will interpret this as, "This man is threatening to run my kids down wiith his car!"

anyone can misisntpret a joke as a 'call to action'

thats pretty stupid

and the 'intent' isn't what qualifies something as 'incitement' only the INTERPRETATION

whether intented that way or not

I have a real smortphone now

@Ayylmao A person commanding someone to do something is not more or less responsible for the outcome simply because of a moral judgement on said outcome.

No it's cut and clear if I say to kill or damage a property that's incitement.

it was US law for almost a century

youre intentionally overblowing a simple situation into some sort of weird extremely autistic scenario

you are being naive and oversimplifying things assuming that people are more often like you, rational, rather than the opposite

if you are lucky, you get a 50/50 mix

That's because animal is probably autistic tbf to go though such mental gymnastics to justify incitement.

but i digress

nope. but i HAVE been misinterpreted BY autistics before and got in trouble for it

you'll learn, eventually..... ( if the left doesn't ruin everything first)

night

Sarcastic remarks exist, and so do things like dogwhistles and "the unknown" in general.

Get some rest those gymnastics are tiring.

A person decides to be a sheep.

It depends on what you’re specifically saying.

If you are say “Ladies and gentlemen, there is a *negro* outside, stealing your *bicycles! That’s the fellow, over yonder! His name is Tyrone! Tyrone, we’re coming for you, Tyrone! Quickly, ladies and gentlemen, accost that *negro*, Tyrone and we’ll have a good old fashioned lynching!”
Obvious incitement. Been illegal for hundreds of years. Not protected speech. At all.

If, on the other hand, you were to say “Ladies and Gentlemen, if you look at these statistics, you’ll clearly see that, as the *negro* population in a community rises, a proportionate rise in bicycle theft is observable.”
That’s not incitement. It’s... kinda douche, and depending on the motivation of the speaker, probably racist, but it’s not incitement.

more importantly to me
it's quite funny

The former has been, and rightly so, illegal forever.
The problem is that the *latter* is more and more being seen as synonymous with the former.

>When you joke about crime but he brings up Black crime statistics

*Winks at the camera*
Like AliG says, keep it real.

tbh most jokes are just humorously phrased statistics

>inb4 13do50

*what's the deeeal with airline food*

*Waves hands in a very Jewish fashion*
And how about daylight savings time? What’s up with thaaaaat?

The Jews are fine.
As are the blacks.
Race not important.
Only ideology important.

Cheers folks, gotta get back to work.

did a vox employee look over your shoulder?

Funny, I walk away for a moment and the conversation turns from space and the potential of mankind to free speech.

Nah it was animal's autism flaring up.

Hey guys can I get a quick opinion on something

From my current MP stellaris game

I need to know what you think of my cat

It may have been, but I'm still gonna pat myself on the back as encouraging peaceful interaction towarda the improvement of mankind.

WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

@PhiloFusor the Omitted First class airline food is pretty decent. XD

Had meatballs in marinara and spinach on the first flight. >.>

@SageTheory. One more thing: The 'autism' that you speak of is what allows and continues to allow both Attorneys and the Left to run circles around you, being so few yet yielding so much influence. Of course, I understand that autistic interpretation IS a bit autistic but that IS the point. In the courtroom, the judge will ALWAYS follow LOGIC over common sense..... no matter how 'autistic' it might seem to the average person.

Erm. "Nutty ninth" I wish I could agree. @ManAnimal

Expecting the authorites to protect you from Antifa and not just look the other way when they have been given unchallenged power to do so... THAT is the true autism.

And let's avoid talking about.. well Portland and even moreso the UK.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3YF0cOqRdA4&feature=share

UK holy shit

understandable

UK put tommy Robinson in jail

really? (haven't heard anything in a good minute... been off the grid)

Holy shit

England has fallen to Islam

I do agree about the intent of the justice systems though.

Trump should have offered Tommy and his family asylum

But it's increasingly failing on the matter of.. well...justice.

Perhaps it is an extreme example, but in my view, that compartmentalization is the only way to keep the State honest

Dude I don't even know what you're on about anymore you spergy cunt.

It is, but the walls have failed.

now, the State is seen as the ONLY authority rather than the State being secondary to parents, grandparents and community which would influence, deter and even punish you outside of the long arms of the law

https://youtu.be/2vpa3V4-g5A LEAF DOES POLITICAL TEST (NOT CLICKBAIT) (GONE SEXUAL)

An agreeable observation. @ManAnimal

I mostly did this because people in another server kept trying to call me far-right, and I haven't done one of these in a while.

@ManAnimal Are you suggesting that the state should parent children more than their parents do?

Is/ought.

The United Caliphate of Al-England and Northern Ireland

noegative

It is that the State overrides the parents, the question is ought it be so?

i am saying the EXACT opposite

And I agree, that it ought *not* be so.

that it is IMPORTANT to have a 'grey zone' that the community has juristiction over

yes, everyone is subject to the law, BUT if no one finds out.....

the State needs to keep it's distance and that means a community must fill that void

@ManAnimal the state shouldn't exist

why can't the community have it's own laws

if you don't have that community, the vaccum will be filled with the State

that way it's offical

I would caveat that the State is neccessary.

and it's less potential for corruption

fill the void with community specific laws

because a community doesn't influence, reward nor enforce with 'laws'

that statment misses the point

LAW is explict

why can't it?

ETHICS is implict

Ethics are the basis for the laws

Community deals which ethics

Anyway be home in about 30 mikes..don't burn the server down in my absence.

the State deals with laws

these are totally different mechanism

I think your conception of "community" is flawed

I'm talking a group of individuals within a certain area

i can remember when we HAD 'community'

@Laucivol the state is not neccessary

small scale

(Also, stop boosting my ego. It's not helpful.)

whereas the state is a larger governing body

i am not so sure your grasp what i am refering to

you see to assume the "community" is the people