the-temple-of-veethena-nike_general
Discord ID: 598761542200197120
281,300 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 78/2813
| Next
The point is below me, honestly.
Pun intended.
Blasian Ethnostate when
My point is the common person won't travel space and if so it'd be years before its affordable.
they can and they will
right now its a n exclusive club because nasa needs pilots that can also do repairs
and no shit workers will exist lol
but when space travel becomes commericalized normies will be admitted too
And it's on the verge.
The Space Force commentary is just an aspect..
mm hmm
It's just taken a long fucking time to get ahold of it.
imagine space 911
space 411?
hijackers turn a rocket into an orbital strike
If it's necessary to risk that.
That is fine.
that is why no habitats; comies would nuke those on earth if they had somewhere ELSE to live
It'll be funny when the rest of the world makes a space military corp. after mocking Trump for it.
its inevitable
I just wish my life path woulda taken a path to controlling more directly. *wipes tears away*
*contributong
>orange man discovers immortality
>people kill themselves in protest
there is no space force. It's simple like AFRICOM or EUCOM etc. simple DOD reorg, like JTAC was with nukes
**contributing
Used to be each branch of the military had charge of their own tactics and deployment of nukes. this resulted in overlap and inefficiency
It's the thought that counts @ManAnimal honestly.
then they consolidated everything nuclear under JTAC
Basically *talking* about Space Force brings it to the public consciousness
whether its up now or not, it will be needed. private companies would get aggressive with each other and start colonizing moons and planets theyre not authorized too.
instead of xenos the first enemies engaged by the space force would definitely be private companies and their private security acting like their own governments
you don't think it is already in the public consciousness?
I think most in the public are just tired of the same old promises
Underscoring it is important.
Moon in 4 yrs... for the last 40 yrs we have heard every President say this
Not that I recall
i dont think so
its private companies that want to go into space
Probably for the better tbh
Still debatable as to whether or not BEING in space can be profitable
Hate to pull it.. Obama? Bush 2? Clinton? Bush 1?
profitable definitely
launching sattellites and visiting? sure. but staying there?
Just a matter of make it so.
>housing
>mining
>prospect of making your own colony and turn a corporation into an actual legal self governing sovereign power
imagine a planet owned solely by disney where they control EVERYTHING
But I absolutely don't recall any "moon in four years" from prior admins.
But truthfully, companies like SpaceX have only been integrators not so much innovators
Skylon if it works would be an innovation
Integration is a step to innovation.
It just works.
but what SpaceX is doing is taking 30 yrs of aerospace work in the industry and integrating it
Yeah, which is absolutely needed.
this is true
That's how efficiency is gained - revision.
The real question is pace of iteration.
But it highlights the uncertainty of whether or not we can make it profitable outside of novelty visits
Efficient enough and I'd think so.
well, the iteration was done with MANY aerospace companies going bankrupt and each moving the ball forward inch by inch
Also, for on lookers, profitability isn't just capital in the form of direct RoI.
this is true especially for the Normies who will tip the balance
personally though, i think much of the new focus comes from 'peer pressure' felt by countries like China and India
the US doesn't want to fall behind
Which is why my argument of why being "hope" is valid in my estimate.
oh no doubt, i agree with you there
We shouldn't have rested on our laurels for so long.
it's just that such 'hope' is usually more abundant with those that haven't heard Bush Senior, Clinton, GWB and Obama make the same empty promises
Again, hate to pull it.. but I don't recall them doing so.
lol. of course you don't.
you hadn't been hatched yet
Recall, I'm in my early 30s.
I was paying attention in Obama, GWB and the end of Clinton's time.
So you seriously don;t remember?
Its almost like you should take a career politician's word with a grain of salt.
As said, I don't remember the latter two aiming at moonshot.
Brb. will get video
I just saw a hard-left friend of mine say "Twitter is run by actual fascists" and my almonds are on fucking fire
@ManAnimal Standin' by. Much obliged
Lessee if airplane wifi plays along.
Hey guys, remember Diablo for mobile?
"I don't like anal."
"What, do you guys not have asses?"
Admission: '89 counts as prior to my awareness.
I mean we did have a mission to mars tho.
probably no thanks to Obama
Okay, catching Bush the 2nd, he actually met the longer goal.. which was ISS.
I may be wrong about Clinton. I can personally remember hearing speeches from all the others but Clinton
Yeah, I recall the Bush one.. and after seeing the thumbnail for Obama I do recall that.
Also, watching the Bush II one...
Fucking Obama broke the plan.
I'm even *more* angry at Obama, now.
Also, even if my account isn't entirely factually accurate, others are sure to have the same disappointment. The fact that we haven't really made many strides forward since those Moon landings in 30+ yrs kinds gives everyone a bad taste in their mouth
Meh, Obama wasn't BAD.. he was just a CUCK
NASA isn't really funded as much.
281,300 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 78/2813
| Next