Report: CIA Deep State Actors Linked to Origin of Russia Hoax Lawyer Up
> https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/10/21/report-cia-deep-state-actors-linked-to-origin-of-russia-hoax-lawyer-up/

Puritans rage about Uzaki-chan poster | get smacked down by Japanese chads
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6pAibo1Kf5s

Did you say Deep State?!?
Super fucking spicy!!!.

~~~
The deep state isn't a secret, antidemocratic cabal. It's a collection of public servants looking to guard the Republic against President Trump's excesses, writes @ mcottle.
~ <https://twitter.com/nytopinion/status/1186250811665457152>
> <https://archive.is/hgjzA>
|
[Opinion]
They Are Not the Resistance. They Are Not a Cabal. They Are Public Servants.
Let us now praise these not-silent heroes.
> <https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/20/opinion/trump-impeachment-testimony.html>
> <https://archive.is/sFGtl>

Canada's Trudeau wins 2nd term but loses majority
> <https://news.yahoo.com/canada-elects-parliament-vote-seen-040458445.html>
|
Canada's Trudeau clings to power, but loses some of his luster
> <https://www.reuters.com/article/us-canada-election-trudeau-newsmaker/canadas-trudeau-clings-to-power-but-loses-some-of-his-luster-idUSKBN1X1065>
|
Justin Trudeau: His rise - and slight fall
> <https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-34576429>
|
Canada's Trudeau wins 2nd term but loses majority
> <https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/liberal-icon-trudeau-fights-to-stay-in-power-as-canada-votes/ar-AAJ5TsF>

BREAKING: Jury rules against dad trying to save his 7-year-old from gender ‘transition’
> https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/breaking-jury-rules-against-dad-trying-to-save-his-7-year-old-from-gender-transition

Now that is infuriating.

At the very bottom she admits that the kids aren't even hers, they had an egg donor.

But she wants to play fucking Money with them.

The cunt.

Lets wait until the kid eats a shotgun

Add another reason to the list of reasons for going mgtow

It's growing rapidly, and it's a big list

as an mra I don't blame you. It's definitely justified at this point.

Yeah, and I mean. They're making it easy for us to remain mgtow 😮

You'd think it's hard to go against one's nature

Not in 2019

Luckily public perception of feminism is shifting, slowly, however.

But it's slow and there will be pain along the way, the MRM will fade before true equality is achieved because men will settle for a tolerable deal.

at least untill we reach transhumanism where we can edit gynocentrism out of our genes.

but like, we're functioning on 5 percent empathy for men at the moment.

how much better would it be for men if it was 30?

I'm not sure if equality is acceptable tbh

It isn't going to be a thing until transhumanism.

but we don't -need- 100 percent equality either.

It used to be common sense that women are lesser than men, just like children are lesser than women

I feel like alot of mgtow forget that. Just make women man up as much as possible.

they don't have to be on the level of men

but they don't have to be retarded children either.

Women's morality is based socially, so if it's not socially acceptable to act like a woman child, they will change their tune. Now this might just be fake and phoned in and relies on social pressures but it's better than women acting like massive cunts with free reign.

and who knows, women might prove us wrong and show us they aren't morally retarded. So, we'll see.

Nature doesn't know or care for equality, and our nature hasn't changed, only our level of wealth and progress has

Men are superior to women in every regard except the biological function of getting pregnant, and the ability to empathize

Men empathize about as much or more than women.

Also, I never said reverse nature, it can be contingent on social pressures, keeping women in line.

I'm talking about the ability, not the will to do so

Men have less empathy by nature

Disagree.

It's a biological fact

Men have about as much or more so.

No, it's a biological fact women are less inclined to care about fairness.

That's a result of them being more empathetic

At least if we look at womens moral development.

No, it's a result of them being taken care of and thus not having to worry about it.

Women don't care about morals, they care about protection

The study explictly stated that more or less.

Morals are a male concept

Right so women don't care about morals but then you say they're more empathetic.

You're backtracking.

Are you equating being moral to being empathetic?

I don't see what you mean my dude.

Absolutely. You require morality to have empathy.

No you don't

Yes you do.

Not at all

If you have no morals, why would you care about empathy?

Empathy is a biological function, it's a brain function

Also, let's look at child abuse statistics, the majority of child abusers are female.

Nature does not care for morals

But yet we're too believe women are more empathetic.

I'm aware of nature not caring about morals.

Morals are a result of higher awareness, not of basic programming

Why are you bringing that up, lol.

Empathy is basic, morals are advanced

Yes, and the only creatures that have actual empathy more or less are humans.

Wrong again

Morals being present is absolutely required to have a sense of empathy or sympathy.

Wrong

Morals are a philosophical concept

You don't need to have higher modes of thinking to be able to empathize

Yes you do.

No you don't

Yes you do.

Prove it

Morals are a philosophical concept as well as a state of being, you can't give empathy to someone without thinking about it first, we're socialized to have empathy.

if you're socialized to not have empathy, you're a sociopath.

Sociopaths have very weak morals.

Have you studied biology or psychology?

To an extent yes, but not thoroughly.

What is "to an extent"?

Just what I told you.

So nothing of significance then, ok

I've done some research into it but I'm not a master.

So you're not an authority on empathy then

No not really.

So now you're making an appeal to authority?

Ok, then why do you think you can tell me the functionality of empathy and morality, if you haven't studied the required fields?

Because I have the ability to think critically.

Sounds like bullshit

Empathy is not something you can "critically think about"

Also, this is very very derailed, the purpose of this conversation was to talk about men having more empathy.

You either study empathy or you don't understand it

or at the very least as much.

Okay let me put the burden of proof on you.

I don't need to prove anything, I didn't make a positive claim

Where is your proof that men don't empathize as much

So you don't want to prove anything, and want me to do all the heavy lifting? That doesn't seem fair.

I have links to research for that
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1963313/

let's take this to another channel btw

this isn't the right channel for this

I just noticed