you mean like a vet

Yes but free :)

pfft

free dog healthcare now? jesus

At this point I needsmust pass out. Cheers!

next there will be free dog college

Rather give free healthcare to dogs than illegal immigrants

<:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>

@Laucivol cheers

But I just want to post a photo and ask a question or two.

sup ya baby boomer fuckers!

<:spurdo:500782204788670474>

Goodwood likes cat drone <:coolgon:549370575701803019>

ill tell you what cracks me up

the rationalwiki

rationalwiki is utter shit

why is there no dissidentwiki

or somethin like that yo

it's a buzzfeed opinion piece pretending to be a alternative to wikipedia

its the site you can use to look up the leftist position on anything you discuss

pretty much

wikipedia is already the leftist position

overton window shifts WAKE UP SHEEPLE

thats why rationalwiki is hilarious to me.. its like... sooo far left

but its presented as totally objective

Its calm before the storm -Q

Wikipedia atleast pretends to be unbiased

Rationalwiki though...

wew

their section on gender is just peak <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

Is tumblr abondon yet?

Idk

Gm.

Too early

nah wikipedia doesnt try to be unbiased lol

especially when you go to their pages on people

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Global_warming#Denial_tactics

peak i n f o r m e d

bahahaha

see the site is hilarious

they have cute infographics you can follow for all the useful idiots

<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

god yeah this is high comedy

now i have both this and guardian opinion article collages to destroy the left

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Cultural_Marxism

this page is just

pffffffffftt

The page is factually correct

t-posing skeleton

a **stiff boner**

You know what I find interesting

This server has 18k members buy the same 10 people are typing everyday

ye the rest are all feds basically

https://twitter.com/AetherionArt/status/1146457990259793920

Not much illegal activity going on here

"Air capture technology to collect CO2 is routinely used in spacecraft and submarines. However, it requires energy to operate and a 2011 study estimated that processing the whole atmosphere would not be cost-effective"

w o w

liberals need to explain how crossing a border is not a negative right

is it because it affects others

Hey everyone how’s you?

how can that be explained though

Hey lune.

like it affects others indirectly, but i dont see how the affect is immediately negative

it might be statistically negative, but you can use statistics to argue a lot of things

like, you can use stats to say that negative rights are being infringed whenever someone farts (although I guess resolving that would be to take away someone's right not to have their bodily functions impinged, which would be a negative right in itself)

And law needs to be dealt for that injustice

Porous borders affect wages.
It's supply and demand for labor

yeah the only way to prove that it affects wages is with stats

you have to concede that a collective can claim ownership of an area, therefore can say that entering is a violation of their property rights

Mind if I ask what were discussing?

Not really. You can use logical deduction.

but then you can just define anything as collectively owned

its almost as though using a nebulous term like "rights" to justify your political/moral claims is fuckign autisting 🤔

inductive reasoning more like

deduction is direct cause and effect

wages don't immediately decline when there's immigration tho

even though it does over time

deduction is immediate cause and effect

Your right to not be locked up ends when you commit a crime. Such as illegal border hopping.

so why would border hopping be illegal? it's not a liberal principle but a nationalist one i guess

you have to combine more than one ideology to have the state

liberalism and civic nationalism

Because it’s about enforcing of law. If a border is open and a criminal escapes that’s hard to track and suffers rights of people, the reverse is true if a criminal enters.

its more like any ideology taken to its autistic conclusion and ignoring pragmatism destroys any state

You can’t protect rights of people you don’t know exist

except fascism by design, but that then comes with its own issues

youll still have a state yeah, just a failed one

Liberal ideology requires laws to be followed. We get to vote on those laws to an extent.

If 75% of people in the USA wanted to decriminalize border crossing, it could be done.

Though you'd soon have no nation anymore

liberal ideologies can fuck off tbh

Fucking democracy.

If democracy exists in a manner that allows its population to actively destroy the nation then it's fucked.

Borders are simply the mechanism to protect from large negative influences usually from other countries. They help the democratic process in the native country, and they stop foreign often undemocratic powers from undermining the country.

Heres one example of why a liberal might want to criminalize border hopping:

Human trafficking

on a scale its being practiced rn its doomed to fail

that's why there's a constitution that requires 75% majority to change

so obviously they'd just criminalize human trafficking

and then to justify enforcement, create ICE

oh wait it already did

Ah yeah and criminalising it would make it so easy to stop

It’s already illegal in the UK an island with fairly strict immigration laws