Stalin killed lots and lots and lots of Jews

Who calls Israel an "illegitimate state"

for instance

@The Big Oof while ruling with a jewish idealogy

I mean

Karl Marx was less of a degenerate than you might imagine

Dont even start marx was a jew

Chom(((sky)))

he hated faggots

for example

Something about that is rlly weird

While being one

Kike Marx

He was a literal leech off his friend

He only hated faggot because they couldn't reproduce for the working class.

Supposedly Karl Marx wrote a book about the Joos, but I haven't bothered to confirm it

Otherwise he would've let them be disgusting

>he only hated something because it was bad for the working class

He already wrote it

wow dude, what a fucking loser

He is

"Ov vey free stuff if you all work :),"

That isn't free

He dumb dumb

Didnt karl marx write a book called "On The Jewish Question?"

Hence the jewry

Ya

Yes @marchwinds

@The Big Oof

yeah

`Well then every ideology is just fucking stupid then
Even liberalism does this, it's just far less direct with it`
the new man meme started with the french revolution, from which liberalism, communism and fascism all base themselves off.
what we need is to go back to true conservatism from before the french revolution, where authority, hierarchy and traditions were valued and respected

but I don't know what it was about

I read it once but I forgot what it said it was so long ago

"History does not travel backwards"
-Benito Mussolini

@Similar Scowl take ur gay royalty and suck start them with a shotgun

Mussolini didn't care that people race mixed. Why would I listen to hI'm

The days of feudalism and its derivates are dead and done for

Feudalism based

No

Wasnt it mussolini that said he expressed concern that white people could get overpopulated by africans and asians

muh foward thinking
historicism is so fucking cancer

Maybe but he didn't care about racemixers.

Let me show you

@marchwinds He did

Yea

but he didn;t think race was real

@Similar Scowl so is gay monarchism

Yeah something like

Race is 80% mind or something

Wtf

Mussolini said that

Mussolini on race mixing

Race is very real

lol

I hate black women.

Race is indeed real

Yeah I dont buy mussolini's shit dont worry

Who could possibly hzve forseen this?

>posting invented quotes from people to make a point
what did he mean by this goys?

So im gonna race mix cause fuck yall <:Dude:459545653031469068>

please don't

context is missing from this, but maybe you're right

Depends, what race are you @JogaFlame

Black.

@Similar Scowl My quotes weren't invented, they were from the doctrine of fascism

Racemixing at all is degenerate

Dont race mix with a white

What the fuck

otherwise idc

@The Big Oof I meant Eileen's quote

You don't understand black women are scum. @eileen

Hitler never endorsed the hate of another race, only the race realism.

They are

@eileen Race is indeed real, but who are you more sympathetic to

Woah

They are

AZ Quotes is not a reliable source it's mostly hear say

>black women are scum

A white communist or an Arab nationalist

But don't fucking racemixing them

Imagine my fucking shock

No race should ever mix

It's cruel.

A arab nationalist

@JogaFlame find a good christian black girl

Because if hes a nationalist he doesnt wanna fuck with me

National Socialism isn't about cruelty. It's about purity.

Yes, most would side with an arab nationalist over a white communist

^

europeans can mix moderately like they've done for centuries

Be that purity black, white, or yellow.

Those don't exist try again. More of them are abandoning religion. @Hiraeth

@Similar Scowl eugh

National socialism is about pretending not to be a cuck when you actually are

The purities should not coexist, though.

Hating Jews is not enough

@JogaFlame dude i know 4

No it isnt.

That's not even fact based.

It is

You're just being a jackass, Ben.

@The Big Oof what about killing jews

Anecdotal evidence doesnt count @Hiraeth

No, I'm not

You are.

You have no facts against it so you insult it.

Can you try refuting his arguments instead of calling him names like a leftist

Both of you

I presented them earlier, I don't feel the need to repost @eileen

Doesn't mean you insult it

You weren't ar gu ing with me.

I'm not a leftist either

I insult it because it fucking sucks

@marchwinds but the statement was that they dont exist

So it wasn't my fault I didn't respond.

Elaborate @Hiraeth

That's still an insult for no good reason.

@marchwinds he said they didnt exist

I say only those who don't prefer their color should mix, but only those who are higher IQ.

😎

Are you just upset you got 25% Jew on 23andme or something? I pity you.

Hitler was a capitalist, and midway through his rule, he abandoned much of his pro-working class policies

that is why I hate him

and national "socialism"

He was a traitor

He wasn't but ok

Where did you reda about that? I'm interested @The Big Oof

Yes he was

He wasn't at first

Im 200% jewish

At first he did a lot of good things

Wtf

Are you a real jew

like paying workers for family activities

I'm 1488% j00

That was good shit

But he became more interested in war than helping the German people over time, and don't, don't start this
>but the war was inevitable

U think hitler wanted with war with the Allies or who @The Big Oof

Hitler shouldve waited until i existed to kill internation jews

Tensions were high and both sides hated each other, but only one of those two was willing to actually start it

that being Hitler

I would be a great attack dog

also, Stalin didn't want to attack Germany, he actually wanted to be a part of the Axis Powers a little while after their non-aggression pact was signed

and fight against Great Britain with Hitler

this gets forgotten

>hitler wanted to start the war

Stalin thought he couldnt fight Hitler

he winded up being wrong, but at the time he didnm't believe he could

How many territories did Hitler forcefully occupy before war was finally declared?

And the allies conceded not just once

So was Hitler supposed to be allowed to get away with just marching in and taking whatever territory he felt was his?

>but it used to be German

and sure, a lot of it did

But he got a lot back

before the war started

Same way i walk into rooms, im big and strong and have guns

If you take half my cake, I ask for it all back, yet you only give 3/4 of what you took back

How is that fair

How do you expect someone to respond when they see you rebuilding your military and walking in and taking over territory?

Even if it was once yours

Submission

What is the response inevitably always going to be

no

*nukes your capital*

That doesnt justify that it was *my cake* and I was taking it back

However I see your point.

For the sake of argument, even if this was the case, and it was all Hitler wanted like you claim

Why then did he turn around and invade the Soviet Union at a time when Stalin
1. Was not interested in war
2. Was completely incapable of attacking Germany

Alright.

Hitler's attack on Russia was a pre-emptive strike because they had revealed plans that the Soviet Union had to invade europe.

Whether these plans were enough justification is debatable, so I don't take sides on that, however, all I know is that he fought the russians because his generals revealed a plan they discovered that Russia has planned to invade europe

That wasn't how I understood it, wasn't the final cause of the falling out a combination of:
1. A seemingly aggressive proposal on Stalin's part
2. Positioning of Soviet troops and the situation with Finland

?

According to a former officer of the Soviet military intelligence and a defector to the UK, in his book, "Icebreaker: Who Started The Second World War" Soviet ground forces were well-organized and mobilized en masse along the German–Soviet frontier for a Soviet invasion of Europe slated for Sunday, July 6, 1941 but were unprepared to defend their own territory.

(In his book.)

Maybe, but I've read about a quote from Stalin where he said the Soviet military wasn't going to be prepared to fight Germany for another few years

I see

Well then we'll just call this one a draw for now

@everyone Daily Question 🔖

Has alcohol had a **overall** negative or positive impact on society? Why or why not?

Depends

Alcohol is part of several cultures

Yes

eeeeeh

Yes but there is no way to stop it

stopping it was tried ages ago

it depends on the drink

never worked

it's useful for chemistry and cooking

and yeah it depends on the drink

alcohol helped many early civilizations

Alcohol can also be used for medical uses i.e. rubbing alcohol

I want to kill ALL OF THE JEWS

I'd say it has more of an individual impact rather than a societal one

it acts as a detriment now without doubt

Positive. It creates jobs and allows cultures to express themselves through their own drinks

but no point of stopping it

mostly negative but maybe few positives

So I'd say it's done more good than bad

if we want to solve it we change social strategies

beer helps with wounds, depression, it has lots of vitamin D, etc

Alcohol has both negative and positive aspects.

yea

alcohol is also good in social situations

beer has lots of calories too

It is useful in cooking, chemistry, medicins, etc.

alchohol is responsible for degeneracy but that can be fixed by other means banning alchohol won't fix it

Though the existence of the alcoholics is a thing.

And a bad one.

hang alcoholics

not worth it

Too extreme you are.

tOo eXtReMe

okay libtard

read siege

@Obungus Shut the fuck up Commie.

I meant booze, but talking about other things related to alcohol is ok

commie?

I am anprim right now

C o m m i e

negative.

Well

hm

It's a mixed bag

On one hand, it has been the fuel of 2000 years of men

And on the other, 100% degenerate

Negative overall effect, alcohol is unnecessary and only a commodity.

*says while drinking a coors light*

can we have a new question?

this one is gay

Actually alcohol was very important back in ye olden days

Water used to be polluted to high hell

@Da_Fish can we have a question about terrorism and insurgency tomorrow

It was safer for children even to drink booze instead of water

But during for example the Middle Ages serfs needed the carbs of beer to stay productive.

@Commissar Femto what question?

hm

"is insuregency and terrorism valid to use" or something

when it was considered only a social or ritualistic drink then it was rathe rpositive, it was also considered medicinal. However it has become laicizised? so taken away the mystical element and its a regular part of life, as a result its has gone to abuse since its significance has been reduced to basically water, which that even has more of a ritual sense to it than alcohol

water was usually boiled

or taken from "safe" sources

no one could run on alcohol constantly, everyone would die at 30 and be too retarded to work the land.

it has to take a ritualistic or mdicinal quality to it again, otherwise its gonna simply continue to be abused

Why ritualistic?

because rituals command respect, add a spiritual level and make the substance in essence part of the ethereal. To abuse it is essentially to attempt to cheat spirituality or what is socially acceptable in meetings etc. Generally this means people will most likely externally generate pressure to obey the unwritten spiritual moral laws

altenratively some countries legit need prohibition to reduce alcoholism

and liver cirhossis

Ah

So the ritual aspect keeps it from being abused or at least deters abuse of it.

yes