qotd

Discord ID: 452955238186614794


38,285 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev | Page 85/383 | Next

2018-08-07 20:27:34 UTC

I think an immigrant should lose citizenship, not sure about normal people, but maybe.

2018-08-07 20:27:36 UTC

Freedeom of expression from the constitution

2018-08-07 20:27:42 UTC

FUCK THE CONSTITUTION

2018-08-07 20:27:48 UTC

Fuck you

2018-08-07 20:27:48 UTC

but generally those who do it should be flogged. Immigrants should be flogged harshly

2018-08-07 20:27:49 UTC

Fuck u fascist

2018-08-07 20:28:08 UTC

Immigrants who do it should get deported

2018-08-07 20:28:18 UTC

^

2018-08-07 20:28:23 UTC

Those without citizenship who dislike their country could be deported as they will never assimilate

2018-08-07 20:28:28 UTC

immigrant who does it should be deported, if a citizen does it, it should require permit just like another protest

2018-08-07 20:28:30 UTC

Their new country

2018-08-07 20:28:38 UTC
2018-08-07 20:28:42 UTC

@Deleted User And what about immigrants with citizenship who do it?

2018-08-07 20:28:51 UTC

I stand by @Deleted User on this one

2018-08-07 20:28:53 UTC

Does a piece of paper really mean anything?

2018-08-07 20:29:01 UTC

They're equal to every other citizen

2018-08-07 20:29:03 UTC

So yes

2018-08-07 20:29:12 UTC

There has to be a legal basis for it

2018-08-07 20:29:21 UTC

The native population should always have more rights than the immigrant population, imo

2018-08-07 20:29:42 UTC

I don't think the majority of 1st generation immigrants can assimilate

2018-08-07 20:30:02 UTC

Maybe if they are english speakers

2018-08-07 20:30:04 UTC

@Deleted User deported

2018-08-07 20:30:09 UTC

rip

2018-08-07 20:30:13 UTC

They should make the effort so their children can

2018-08-07 20:30:15 UTC

I believe that citizens doing it are fine as it is part of freedom of speech but immigrants or people who are from other origin should get cheked and marked with "has openly spoken against the nation" or something which would pretty much be a "watch out for this person" mark for organizations and companies and stuff.

2018-08-07 20:30:22 UTC

They won't go 100%

2018-08-07 20:30:28 UTC

But they can get close

2018-08-07 20:30:54 UTC

But if they form little paki towns or china towns that's a problem

2018-08-07 20:30:55 UTC

FREE FUCKING SPEECH

2018-08-07 20:30:59 UTC

STOP FUCKING INTRUDING

2018-08-07 20:31:00 UTC

BUSH!

2018-08-07 20:31:01 UTC

lol

2018-08-07 20:31:34 UTC

also depends what flag they are burning

2018-08-07 20:31:54 UTC

no immigration

2018-08-07 20:32:22 UTC

in the case of burning a North Korean flag or something it'd technically be alright, North korea is not a very liked state which would allow for people ot be able to burn the flag and not suffer concequences unless they accidentally start a fire

2018-08-07 20:32:49 UTC

I'd say the only flag people should get penalized for burning is a regional or federal flag

2018-08-07 20:39:58 UTC
2018-08-07 21:01:48 UTC

Have a fine for burning it, but along those lines make printing it all over random commercialised shit made in other countries a crime too

2018-08-07 23:23:11 UTC

flag burning's all good

2018-08-07 23:23:37 UTC

tbh it seems like a meaningless form of protest but what do i know

2018-08-07 23:25:49 UTC

Only legal if it's our enemy ๐Ÿ’ช๐Ÿป

2018-08-07 23:26:48 UTC

If you burn the flag of your country, the rehabilitation process should take place, whether it be mental help to cure mental illness or to jail

2018-08-07 23:28:34 UTC

jail is not rehabilitation in the us

2018-08-07 23:28:38 UTC

so that makes it trickier

2018-08-07 23:29:10 UTC

I think it can be

2018-08-08 04:04:20 UTC

Let's be careful to be patriotic without turning our flags and symbols into idols.

2018-08-08 04:06:09 UTC

Nationalism is god-given

2018-08-08 04:19:43 UTC

nationalism is normal

2018-08-08 13:52:17 UTC

Nationalism is natural and God-given

2018-08-08 16:49:42 UTC

Of course!

2018-08-08 20:46:46 UTC

@everyone Daily Question ๐Ÿ”–

Should women balance homelife and careers, or should they be required to pick one over the other? Explain

2018-08-08 20:47:02 UTC

dumb question

2018-08-08 20:47:02 UTC

gay question

2018-08-08 20:47:03 UTC

read the bible

2018-08-08 20:47:05 UTC

^

2018-08-08 20:47:11 UTC

@Obungus It was a request

2018-08-08 20:47:11 UTC

1 Timothy 2:12

2018-08-08 20:47:13 UTC

is enough

2018-08-08 20:47:15 UTC

read it

2018-08-08 20:47:16 UTC

2018-08-08 20:47:21 UTC
2018-08-08 20:47:33 UTC

rip, I'll just ask a better one next time

2018-08-08 20:47:44 UTC

good!

2018-08-08 20:48:09 UTC

Different obviously, and we don't need the Torah or whatever to know it

2018-08-08 20:48:26 UTC

read ezekiel 4:12

2018-08-08 20:48:46 UTC

How about I reword it to this:

"Should women balance homelife and careers, or should they be required to pick one over the other?"

2018-08-08 20:49:02 UTC

gay question still

2018-08-08 20:49:07 UTC

The answer is obvious

2018-08-08 20:49:11 UTC

Good question lazydaze

2018-08-08 20:49:14 UTC

nope

2018-08-08 20:49:23 UTC

There are definitely differences between men and women, both physical and mental.

2018-08-08 20:49:24 UTC

Froce is wrong don't listen to "him"

2018-08-08 20:49:34 UTC

I think the best most appropriate answer i can muster up is as follows:

2018-08-08 20:49:38 UTC

COLLECTIVE

2018-08-08 20:50:01 UTC

rip

2018-08-08 20:50:19 UTC

Women should have a limited role in the workplace

2018-08-08 20:50:29 UTC

if at all

2018-08-08 20:50:34 UTC

Their duty is to be homemakers

2018-08-08 20:50:49 UTC

And anyone who disagrees is a libtard

2018-08-08 20:50:52 UTC

dumb question man

2018-08-08 20:51:26 UTC

rip

2018-08-08 20:51:50 UTC

technically most people should work from home as farmers/tradesmen anyway so women are no exception

2018-08-08 20:54:45 UTC

I'd change it to a different one, but I don't want to ping @'everyone twice

2018-08-08 21:12:18 UTC

Depends on the situation in my opinion

2018-08-08 21:22:48 UTC

@ken what kind of situation?

2018-08-08 21:27:13 UTC

I'd say in the overwhelming majority of circumstances, they should be at home

2018-08-08 22:39:54 UTC

They should stay home once they have children. Prior part time work maybe.

2018-08-08 22:56:15 UTC

women can do what they want it's not my choice

2018-08-09 00:28:06 UTC

But it does affect you at some point or another

2018-08-09 01:17:00 UTC

Late, but Agreed ^

2018-08-09 03:28:12 UTC

Itโ€™s a womenโ€™s choice, and wether or not it affects you doesnโ€™t mean you have a right to have a say in it.

2018-08-09 03:28:35 UTC

Lots of things โ€œeffectโ€ people but arenโ€™t about them

2018-08-09 03:28:55 UTC

The price of gas โ€œeffectsโ€ you but that doesnโ€™t mean you get to choose what it costs

2018-08-09 03:43:06 UTC

Women who are stay at home moms have better lives

2018-08-09 03:43:16 UTC

this is a scientific fact

2018-08-09 03:43:31 UTC

society is also better off with women being homemakers

2018-08-09 05:37:31 UTC

^

2018-08-09 05:39:56 UTC

What about the case where a women has to work for income, either to support just herself or her children. If her role is to take care of the children wouldn't ensuring there's money to feed the kids and pay for rent be part of that?

2018-08-09 09:31:46 UTC

@Alexander Ramsey โ€œbetterโ€ is completely subjective and useless in an argument like this

2018-08-09 09:31:56 UTC

So you canโ€™t scientifically prove that

38,285 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev | Page 85/383 | Next