chat

Discord ID: 452955220473806859


89,136 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev | Page 142/357 | Next

2018-09-07 16:27:04 UTC

open borders = good

2018-09-07 16:27:16 UTC
2018-09-07 16:27:19 UTC

Canada?

2018-09-07 16:27:29 UTC

@Enclave thought you said you were leaving...

Sweet, Holy Lord, give me strength to understand.

China is gearing up for an attack.

Not really.

2018-09-07 16:27:49 UTC

China can't do shit.

2018-09-07 16:27:51 UTC

i need 1 convert to marx-len

2018-09-07 16:27:55 UTC

before i leave

Just to be annoying in the south China Sea.

2018-09-07 16:27:59 UTC

No

2018-09-07 16:28:07 UTC

China won't be able to attack the US for 30 years and that's if we do nothing

And if there were an invasion launched it would come from Canada.

Not Canada itself.

2018-09-07 16:28:30 UTC

canadians are peacefull thou

2018-09-07 16:28:31 UTC

Canada would not be able to support an invasion

But just as a theatre.

2018-09-07 16:28:39 UTC

what will they attack us with maple syrup ?

You're stupid.

2018-09-07 16:28:46 UTC

China couldn't get troops into Canada in the first place.

2018-09-07 16:29:03 UTC

Oceans = completely 100% the territory of the US Navy

Overconfidence was the fall of many nations and empires.

2018-09-07 16:29:10 UTC

Any hypothetical must not ignore this

2018-09-07 16:29:18 UTC

We have a navy literally 40 times the size of theirs

2018-09-07 16:29:35 UTC

We wouldn't let a Chinese army cross the ocean

2018-09-07 16:29:38 UTC

For any reason

2018-09-07 16:29:47 UTC

Even the current administration

To assume that nobody has made any progress aside from the USA is sheerly asinine.

For your information

2018-09-07 16:30:11 UTC

Navy is the only thing that matters in war.

2018-09-07 16:30:29 UTC

Chinese don't have a decent one

The Canadian DND has a lot of Chinese nationals in it.

2018-09-07 16:30:33 UTC

And won't for 30 years

And we share intelligence with you.

2018-09-07 16:30:58 UTC

You cannot secretly move an army.

No, but the goal of China in a conflict would be to make it such a devastating loss to attack, that it wouldn't be worth it short of war.

2018-09-07 16:31:53 UTC

Yes

2018-09-07 16:31:59 UTC

China would win a defensive war

2018-09-07 16:32:03 UTC

But can't project force

Would be to win by attrition.

2018-09-07 16:32:07 UTC

Especially to North America

Slowly widdling away at morale and motivation.

2018-09-07 16:32:25 UTC

Chinese military is a regional one

2018-09-07 16:32:35 UTC

They cannot attack beyond their region

2018-09-07 16:32:49 UTC

daily reminder the USA is cancer on this earth

2018-09-07 16:33:10 UTC

They simply do not have the infrastructure or the ability to defend large oceanic troop movements

I just don't think underestimating your enemy is good.

You should always assume there is some end game in the works.

2018-09-07 16:33:31 UTC

They physically cannot secretly move an army

2018-09-07 16:33:37 UTC

They cannot hide their ships

2018-09-07 16:33:40 UTC

Or their numbers

2018-09-07 16:33:49 UTC

@Deleted User daiy reminder without this cancer the arabs would've slaughtered you already

2018-09-07 16:33:50 UTC

Unless the Chinese develop teleportation

2018-09-07 16:33:55 UTC

Your idea is impossible

2018-09-07 16:34:18 UTC

what if i told yo u

2018-09-07 16:34:19 UTC

I'm an European Jew

2018-09-07 16:34:20 UTC

you

2018-09-07 16:34:20 UTC

We literally can detect missile launches via the light they produce

2018-09-07 16:34:23 UTC

not an Israeli

2018-09-07 16:34:27 UTC

We can see boats moving

2018-09-07 16:34:29 UTC

though I do have the passport just in case ๐Ÿ˜‰

2018-09-07 16:34:31 UTC

which part of europe

2018-09-07 16:34:39 UTC

i live in the UK

2018-09-07 16:34:41 UTC

i am guessing in the west

2018-09-07 16:34:42 UTC

yup

2018-09-07 16:34:43 UTC

but I am a Hungarian Jew

2018-09-07 16:34:53 UTC

you got a arab as a mayor

2018-09-07 16:34:54 UTC

of london

2018-09-07 16:35:00 UTC

that's my city ๐Ÿ˜‰

2018-09-07 16:35:00 UTC

they're walking over you

2018-09-07 16:35:04 UTC

you might want to move out

2018-09-07 16:35:07 UTC

before they become

2018-09-07 16:35:09 UTC

ehhhh

I don't know, what of your intelligence is wrong? What if their capabilities are greatly underestimated?

2018-09-07 16:35:10 UTC

yah I am not happy about the Arabs

2018-09-07 16:35:12 UTC

caiphate of england

2018-09-07 16:35:15 UTC

out out out out

2018-09-07 16:35:29 UTC
2018-09-07 16:35:35 UTC

eastern europe will remain european while the west will merge into a caiphate

2018-09-07 16:35:39 UTC

We can literallt see everything they have

2018-09-07 16:35:41 UTC

At all times

You suggest that you try to drive out non-whites

Which would lead to civil War.

2018-09-07 16:35:55 UTC

Probably

2018-09-07 16:36:02 UTC

I can always return to Hungary if the UK becomes intolerable

And a strain on resources.

2018-09-07 16:36:12 UTC

The Chinese navy would still be too weak

2018-09-07 16:36:13 UTC

and I can always go to Israel too ๐Ÿ˜‰

So you are saying that strain would not be opportunity to some?

2018-09-07 16:36:24 UTC

what you mean by hungarian jew btw

2018-09-07 16:36:25 UTC

China is the only one even on the table

And how staffed are the ships?

2018-09-07 16:36:30 UTC

half ethnic jew half hungarian

2018-09-07 16:36:34 UTC

or just jewish in religion

2018-09-07 16:36:35 UTC

g-d damn it feels good to jewish

How well trained?

2018-09-07 16:36:40 UTC

Our Navy?

How prepared for combat?

2018-09-07 16:36:48 UTC

Hungarian Jews have always been well interpreted into Hungarian society

2018-09-07 16:36:53 UTC

Our navy is largely automated

2018-09-07 16:36:53 UTC

integrated

2018-09-07 16:36:59 UTC

And unnecessarily large

2018-09-07 16:37:09 UTC

Hungarian Jews spoke Hungarian not Yiddish

2018-09-07 16:37:23 UTC

Navally the balance of power of the world is more in our favor than any nation in history

So... Say they found a way to scramble the electronic communications?

2018-09-07 16:37:31 UTC

Even the British did not have such an advantage

2018-09-07 16:37:40 UTC

Our ships are hardened against EMP

2018-09-07 16:37:58 UTC

usa has the big gay

And you just assume that there would be no other way to do so?

2018-09-07 16:38:08 UTC

your population is progressively going gay/non binary

2018-09-07 16:38:10 UTC

Not without effecting them too

2018-09-07 16:38:10 UTC

and pacifist

I'm not saying there is.

2018-09-07 16:38:14 UTC

you're dying soon

2018-09-07 16:38:27 UTC

Chinese naval doctrine relies entirely upon ballistic missiles

Only that it is foolhardy to think yourself ultimate and supreme over your enemies.

2018-09-07 16:38:39 UTC

Any electronic attack would also fuck u0 their doctrine

2018-09-07 16:38:47 UTC

I know about this stuff.

2018-09-07 16:39:24 UTC

He comes from an imperialist nation what do you expect

2018-09-07 16:39:25 UTC

US naval doctrine is based around ship based missiles and carriers

2018-09-07 16:39:36 UTC

Chinese is based on long range ballistic missiles and

2018-09-07 16:39:41 UTC

late imperialist mentality is always foolhardy

2018-09-07 16:39:48 UTC

In an electronic or electronicless environment

2018-09-07 16:39:52 UTC

US wins both ways

2018-09-07 16:40:00 UTC

you can point this out to the dolt, and he'll never see it

2018-09-07 16:40:04 UTC

he is blinded by his culture

The Chinese are developing long range weapons that are thought to be capable of taking down a destroyer.

That's why they're so bold in the south China seas.

2018-09-07 16:40:28 UTC

Destroyers are worthless and meant to be destroyed

2018-09-07 16:40:40 UTC

AEGIS cruisers.

And China is making carriers and such.

2018-09-07 16:40:43 UTC

Backbone of the fleet

2018-09-07 16:40:46 UTC

western europe <:ToMyDrink:459545654323314710>

2018-09-07 16:40:51 UTC

eastern europe ๐Ÿ‘Œ๐Ÿป

2018-09-07 16:40:53 UTC

China bought one rusted Soviet carrier

2018-09-07 16:41:00 UTC

And has no experience operating it

2018-09-07 16:41:02 UTC

We have 16

2018-09-07 16:41:12 UTC

i mean

2018-09-07 16:41:19 UTC

usa can easily beat china

2018-09-07 16:41:20 UTC

We have more capacity per carrier

It's just to underestimate the capability of your enemy so much...

2018-09-07 16:41:31 UTC

And the ability to refuel only once every 15 years

2018-09-07 16:41:38 UTC

It's not underestimation

2018-09-07 16:41:42 UTC

If you have the data dude

2018-09-07 16:41:57 UTC

How would one carrier beat 16

2018-09-07 16:42:02 UTC

imagine thinking you have the data

2018-09-07 16:42:05 UTC

๐Ÿ˜‚

I don't think anyone knows exactly what China is up to.

Just like Russia.

2018-09-07 16:42:18 UTC

We can see everything they do

2018-09-07 16:42:20 UTC

At all times

2018-09-07 16:42:24 UTC

china is looking forwards to the day the glorious ussr return

Yeah, okay.

2018-09-07 16:42:28 UTC

We see every troop movement Russia makes

2018-09-07 16:42:34 UTC

The USA is omniscient

2018-09-07 16:42:36 UTC

๐Ÿ˜‚

2018-09-07 16:42:37 UTC

Our satellites are constantly watching

2018-09-07 16:42:39 UTC

russian communist party will settle in office once putin dies

2018-09-07 16:42:46 UTC

then china and russia will kill usa

2018-09-07 16:42:51 UTC

Americans are so dumb

China might just try to weaponize Thorium or some crap.

Or develop some kind of other horrible thing

2018-09-07 16:43:18 UTC

Nuclear weapons would result in the destruction of China

2018-09-07 16:43:25 UTC

They would have no reason to use them

2018-09-07 16:43:44 UTC

<:ToMyDrink:459545654323314710>

People too big for their britches.

2018-09-07 16:44:20 UTC

I'm telling you dude, our satellites are designed to pick up missile launches from orbit

2018-09-07 16:44:25 UTC

You can't hide a ship

2018-09-07 16:44:27 UTC

Or a train

If you think there is no way you can lose... That's where the loss begins.

2018-09-07 16:44:30 UTC

<:sadcat:459545658282475530>

2018-09-07 16:44:45 UTC

This isn't 1905 when you can hide a fleet

And if they had... Deep sea capabilities?

2018-09-07 16:45:11 UTC

muh omniscient god nation

2018-09-07 16:45:19 UTC

We have the largest submarine fleet in the world

2018-09-07 16:45:27 UTC

Even subs have to be drydocked

2018-09-07 16:45:34 UTC

>usa
>beating china

2018-09-07 16:45:36 UTC

Where satellites can see them

2018-09-07 16:45:36 UTC

get outa here

Then continue to think there is no possibility of loss.

2018-09-07 16:45:42 UTC

>is muslim
>is 16 year old
>has fucked 4 males
>marxist
>has an american flag as pfp

2018-09-07 16:45:47 UTC

I know there is no possibility of loss.

2018-09-07 16:45:49 UTC

Something is rotten

2018-09-07 16:45:52 UTC

China cannot project force

2018-09-07 16:45:55 UTC

i am not musim

2018-09-07 16:45:58 UTC

At least for another 30 years

2018-09-07 16:46:02 UTC

Musim

Then you would be a horrible military and national leader.

2018-09-07 16:46:08 UTC

i am just saying islam > nazism and fascism

2018-09-07 16:46:09 UTC

Navy strategy is different than land strategy

You would lead your country to Ruin.

2018-09-07 16:46:10 UTC

I forgot the 103 iq

2018-09-07 16:46:17 UTC

You're just uneducated my dude

2018-09-07 16:46:17 UTC

but i am not muslim

2018-09-07 16:46:20 UTC

i am an atheist

No, I'm cautious.

2018-09-07 16:46:25 UTC

Navy strategy is built strategy

2018-09-07 16:46:27 UTC

Even worst

2018-09-07 16:46:30 UTC

Everything takes decades

2018-09-07 16:46:35 UTC

We have a hell or a head start

2018-09-07 16:46:44 UTC

Of*

2018-09-07 16:46:45 UTC

thou not a skeptical one

You should always think something could go wrong.

That somebody might make a mistake.

2018-09-07 16:46:55 UTC

there might be god there might not be nobody knows

2018-09-07 16:46:57 UTC

๐Ÿคท

2018-09-07 16:46:58 UTC

Divine intervention maybe

It only takes a few to subterfuge.

And in a reactionary war.

2018-09-07 16:47:33 UTC

Okay how would a human accidentally wipe out 12 carrier groups to put us on par with the Chinese

Those details are often overlooked.

2018-09-07 16:47:51 UTC

We don't have all of our eggs in one basket

I'm not saying you do.

I'm saying to think nothing could go wrong is a horrible mentality.

2018-09-07 16:48:40 UTC

You're just using a what if scenario without substance because you know nothing of the naval balance of power and are speaking in platitudes about caution

I'm using a what if scenario because I know that humans are not perfect and easily manipulated by grandeur.

2018-09-07 16:49:26 UTC

China can win a defensive war with land based batteries and aircraft

2018-09-07 16:49:33 UTC

Offensive? No.

2018-09-07 16:49:47 UTC

It's not grandeur

2018-09-07 16:49:52 UTC

It's the ability to count

2018-09-07 16:49:58 UTC

Not a good one

2018-09-07 16:50:15 UTC

You can refit and build an entire army in a year

2018-09-07 16:50:19 UTC

A navy will take 30-50

2018-09-07 16:50:25 UTC

It's static

So if say somebody inside the line turned on the other ships..

2018-09-07 16:50:34 UTC

There are no surprises in naval warfare

2018-09-07 16:50:46 UTC

Nothing would happen firstly

2018-09-07 16:50:52 UTC

You would need the entire crew to turn

2018-09-07 16:50:56 UTC

Which is unlikely

2018-09-07 16:51:02 UTC

And then it's just one ship

2018-09-07 16:51:11 UTC

Out of what, 800

It's one attack that was unexpected and would send ripples of mistrust.

2018-09-07 16:51:30 UTC

Secondly aegis overlaps

2018-09-07 16:51:40 UTC

So whatever one of our ships fires

2018-09-07 16:51:48 UTC

Others within the same fleet can shoot it down

2018-09-07 16:52:24 UTC

Think of a Carrier group as a Venn diagram with 12 circles overlapping

2018-09-07 16:52:34 UTC

Those circles are the missile defense grids

2018-09-07 16:52:48 UTC

They can shoot down anything coming into it with 11 back ups

So you think the military would be capable of surpressing insurgency on the homefront while waging war abroad as well?

2018-09-07 16:53:30 UTC

Navy is entirely separate from land forces

2018-09-07 16:53:37 UTC

And operates independently

I don't think it's unfeasible either.

2018-09-07 16:53:47 UTC

What affects one does not affect the other directly

89,136 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev | Page 142/357 | Next