general
Discord ID: 450389123081961476
86,771 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 172/868
| Next
sorry, thought this was the natural direction to go with the way you talk about your uncle
I'm not sure which was better
Yeah but I'd have to say the NRA has changed a bit since the times of the black panthers
Trump winning or Hillary winning
I would say it's in the interest of the NRA and military industrial complex not to fuel revolutionaries
^^^
Trump exposed the evil in this world and around us
Bernie was best choice tbh
It's just liberal bourgeoisie want further disarmament
USA could not afford revolution rn
NO APOLOGISM FOR BERNIE PLZ
Which awoken a lot of people rn
But also divided our nation
Mhm
Idk
Feeling blue pill felt good
"apologism" what is there to apologize for?
Bernie is useful as a tool for agitation
But being awoken feels amazing
Bernie's policy still sucks th0
Yet sad
he had legitimate socialist policies that he had stood by for as long as we can look back.
He couldn't have won America tho
You better be woke or else the liberals will get ya
Which socialist policies
@everyone CAN WE ALL SAY THAT EMMA GONZALEZ AND DAVID HOGG ARE IDIOTS
They are puppets
LIBERALS BEING WOKE ๐ ๐ ๐ ๐
They do as their told
Say that againwhile you vote for Hillary
Also anyone wanna see a picture of Emma in bikini
They are tools of the state
Woke is a stupid term tbh
Mmmmmm owo
No liberals just too bourgeoisie to be woke
^
Cool
Liberals trying to argue feminism or racial discrimination without marxism is painful as fuck.
single payer healthcare, free college, large tax plan to redistribute wealth to lower classes, heavier taxes on the wealthy class.
pretty fucking socialist to me
Welp
Just got a job offer
Capitalism ๐
To move boxes
@Benny_Boi (weeb hunter) la epic
Thank
Reverse card
Single payer healthcare is a worker apeasement so is free college, bernie wasnt insurrectionist about redistribution of wealth and we dont wsnt taxes higher on rich but to liqudate them as a class @ajsbeast
I don't like taxes
K dad
yes, but we're talking about America here
uwu
DEFINITION of socialism doesnt change from where you are in the world smh
I like socialism tbh it was hard for me to choice between the socialist party and the liberal party but I believe that socialism works only if it is mixed in with capitalism. The Nordic countries are a good example of capitalism and socialism being mixed together
it's still socialist, technically social democrat.
Yes
Bernie appears socialist but is just a sane keynesian
just no revolutions are going on in the streets because he's not a fucking retard.
Socialism mixed with capitalism is revisionism if not done like China.
that revolution shit wouldn't work right now.
Isn't Bernie a social Democrat and not a democratic socialist?
He's more of a social Democrat but be calls himself a democratic socialist
Democratic Socialism is a path to revisionism, any socialist bone in that is snuffled out by the bourgeoisie.
There's your answer @TheOneRJB
**National Populism is best political system.**
yeah yeah yeah, the only way to make change is to shoot rich people until you get your ass thrown in jail and the movement you support gets marked as an extremist group.
good game.
The best thing for a communist party to do in America is to try to target the imperialist sectors of industry like the military industrial complex and corrupt it from the inside to work as an anti imperialist movement
at the end of the day the only thing you ever did was made something you care about look like a joke (such as what the neo-Nazis have done) or radicals and no actual legislative progress is made.
I believe that the worker should have rights and have a mutual relationship with tbe bourgeoisie and also that people should choose whether they want free healthcare/education or not and therefore make taxes a choice n shit.
Also no communist are not for individual acts of terror the revolution requires preparation
**Hammer of Populism with the Sword of Nationalism.**
**yeet**
Lol
The anti imperialist struggle in America is helpful for supporting third world communusts like PKP in phillpines and Naxalities in India when America funds the fight against then tbh.
Ibdia?
Im not a three world theorist
But i agree we should support comrades where we can.
Businesses should be able to deny access to certain people as long as it is not discriminatory
Like Starbucks
Private company, didn't buy so they didn't get to do shit in there
Not because Starbucks is racist
But becaise they have *rules*
@ajsbeast im quoting engels here
"Finally, the third category consists of democratic socialists who favor some of the same measures the communists advocate, as described in Question 18, not as part of the transition to communism, however, but as measures which they believe will be sufficient to abolish the misery and evils of present-day society
These democratic socialists are either proletarians who are not yet sufficiently clear about the conditions of the liberation of their class, or they are representatives of the petty bourgeoisie, a class which, prior to the achievement of democracy and the socialist measures to which it gives rise, has many interests in common with the proletariat.
."
Bernie was one of the few candidates that actually wanted to help comrades, but because he wasn't an extremist we should write him off.
a private company should have the choice to serve whoever they want
Ajs read engels word common policy is fine with democratic socialist if it is not in support of the bourgeoisie class
@notjojo vc thot
Taoism is cool
@Benny_Boi (weeb hunter) u miss spelt MAOISM
that makes sense, I don't think the bourgeoise support any degree of socialism, but they'll resist it incrementally less than instant revolution.
My problem is that bernie comes off as Keynesian and only implementing these policies as a means to appease the workers which is nice but not a fight towards the socialist goal of democratic ownership of the means of Production
I agree, but I'd rather have decent unions than our current state.
and he was one of the only people who supported that.
Im in support of unions i guess
he wanted to make the proletariat satisfied, there is no wrong in that.
86,771 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 172/868
| Next