rip

No he'll be fine

It was almost definitely just being an edgelord or refencing the pedophilic tendencies within the gay community.

He'll live to trigger normies for some time

Have you guys read his FB statement?

Milo is on our side 100%, this is how the left attacks people

There'll be hit pieces, he'll self publish his book and Steve Bannon will pick another person to take his place while Milo goes full "punished faggot, a man denied his book deal"

he'll get by yes but itll be some recovery time

Don't give into that shit and say oh he's a hopeless faggot

and no darty what was it

Don't let the left dictate who is allowed to speak

Basically that what he said was misrepresented, and that he misspoke a bit as well

by digging up ancient jokes

He ain't hopeless, but I don't wanna be the guy defending paedophiles, that is sure as shit not the hill I'm dying on.

He is fully against pedophilia, he doesn't endorse it in any way. He has outed 3 child abusers himself as well

We know this, this is something we can say.

again, he considers pedophilia to be people who want sub 13 year old kids

to be fair that literally is pedophilia

That's more a matter of semantics @Benzmiller

i agree, semantics

No he considers it to be below 16, the legal age of consent in many countries.

It's 16 here, no one gives a fuck, and there's been nary a request to change it in memory.

that's what he has said in multiple videos

like the amazing atheist thing

Though with how most people act it may as well be 14...

argued the semantics about it

to be fair AA is a terrible person anyways

hes a terrible example of anything

Fuck Amazing Atheist.

There seems to be a crap spectrum in the skeptic community.

yes, fuck that guy. it's just that for some reason milo thought he should be defending his position on the issue rather than just agreeing that we shouldn't fuck underage people

Harmful Opinions is the only pure waifu that could be considered part of it

AA and Atheism Unstoppable are at the crappiest end of that spectrum.

Sargon's alright, thunderf00t is tolerable when he's not talking about anita sarkesian for the 12049th time.
Rest are pure cancer.

TL;dr is pretty cool, as is HO. but both of them rejected the community.

why arent we coordinating with 3%ers or other militias?

Sargon has his head up his ass lately but beyond that is ok
TF id also say any time he talks politics at all is horrid

thunderfoot is so retarded he thought "we the people" was a trump slogan

and yeah TL;DR is also based

Vee can be ammusing but he says the stupidest shit

I like Vee on sargons streams but elsewhere dont care

Shoe on head and her boyfriend are about mid tier on the crap spectrum.

Not as bad as some of the other ones, but still pretty bad.

I dunno, I've been having fun with the jontron/sargon collabs recently.
They have about as much of a clue as I'd expect from entertainers talking about politics but they're amusing at the very least.

Jontron isn't really part of the community. More like an outsider that's friendly.

^

and yeah he is fun when he partakes

Amazing atheist is the show for the 14 year old edgelord of the left libertarian persuasion who wants to "rebel" without having to understand society enough to understand what they're rebelling against.

k

learned some more interesting things about them

This is on Internationalism and Globalization

Both AA and AU just seem like obnoxious twats in the way they talk and act.

Also, Milo's response https://www.facebook.com/myiannopoulos/posts/851826321621931

man

how is everyone falling for the milo shill trap

it's fucking stupid

@Rasenemus They're like that. If you argue too much you'll be kicked out.
The left is currently an alliance between multiple factions, the elite, the socialists and the Progressives.

Each think they're playing the other and that in the end their faction will win.

"I am a gay man, and a child abuse victim."

So?

Of the three, if we fail the Elite have by far the highest chance of victory.

These are SJW victim olympics tactics

I mean I know Milo is mostly in the whole thing for his own gain. But he seams to have been genuinely misrepresented in this case.

Read the previous responses, as well as the video. Context, platz.

When it comes to pedophilia, the only politically acceptable stance is full rejection

Everyone knows how this works

Thats what he said

He claims that the video misrepresented his position, and that he is fully against it.

glad milo apologized, he should've been more clear and not fucking around with that subject

We've never been politically correct.

The movement which has spawned this group is a rebellion against everything sensible, everything accepted with facts, with discussion and dissidence both sensible and not.

And Milo is the same.

Though this is another level.

Politically correct would be character assassination someone we don't like by claiming he said it was ok to do what many in our own movement have admitted to doing.

Its the SJWs who are doing this.

While it is a fine line he's traversed here, it's the media that's going to play this up. Think of who has to gain from this before making immediate conclusions. No one can be trusted.

There's ways he could turn this around, do keep in mind he is charismatic, smart and good at milking controversy.
And a student of Bannon, who's a master at this.

^

He uses the controversy to point out pedophilia in the left, publish his book.
And then write a second book decrying the pedophilic subculture in the LGBT and related communities, use this to decry the mainstream left.

That's what I'd do.

They have actually backed themselves into a corner here.

There's two motives here. Either it was an intentional controversy trap he set a year or so ago, or it's completely accidental banter. Either way, Milo is only going to get more recognition through this. And in his business, bad recognition is never bad.

The big question comes down to us though:
Do we defend or decry milo?

Because now they can't defend the "I'm a pedophile but not a monster" bullcrap anymore. Nor can they let off Lena dunham for playing with he baby sisters cunt

god thats true

fucking dunham

they'll keep defending it

they are always hypocritical

The question is not "we" chancellor.

Well yeah, but they will look even shittier. Redpill more normies

We're not a singular entity.

"If they didn't have double standards, the liberals would have no standards at all"

basically

This made me kek

Armored skeptic's gf censored his channel's of posts containing candid.

Because free speech

or something

That's strange.