creation-vs-evolution
Discord ID: 484515915069784085
7,669 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 7/31
| Next
Egyptians did use slaves for a slight period
they didnt use slave labor in their construction projects
sorry im not educated at all about ancient civilisation
true
so excuse the ignorance
you have to know that the pyramids for example weren't built by slaves
rather by well paid workers
the entire population of egyptian was a couple million, so 600,000 people leaving would be a bit obvious
i think it was about 1/5 the population
again
also the parting of the red sea? really?
ok, the jews didnt sweep into Israel and conquer it
they were already there
distances in the Bible are far off
we all know that
so are you saying that jews didn't go to Egypt at all?
here
the nile region, probably
^
basically
the partition of the red sea is really badly translated
"tavol"
egypt did conquer Palestine. So fleeing from the nile to Palestine is stupid
it wasn't a sea they crossed
rather a "sea of canes"
that's what it's written
there's a big difference
now sea of canes doesn't mean the sea was made out of canes
but rather that they crossed some farms
Lets flee from Egyptian controlled land to escape the pharoh and settle in Palestine where Egyptian armies regularly cross through on their conquests and wars with the Hittites
BRILLIANT
brilliant indeed
damn
so the passover, integral to jews, is bogus?
but I'll remember you that jews had the 'kavod
also, lets settle in Egyptian controlled territory to escape the Pharoh
BRILLIANT
Cant contain much intelligent ideas when the book itself is stupid
no it's not bogus dumblebore
the new translation is
>since they werent in Egypt it kinda is
hugh the Bible isn't a book
it's a collection of books
also, it does have some good morals in it
true
it does
then you just contradicted yourself
most of the biblical morality is rejected though
it's dumb but it has good morals
certain good morals
i didnt say it was all good, just that it does have some good parts
i mean fornication, homosexuality, divorce and all is fine now
still dumb
I'm starting to think this guy is a troll
yeah the Bible does have some good parts indeed
yea they were hard on homosexuals
_they actually weren't_
any proof?
yes of course!
I never argument without proof
though, it doesnt matter what the bible actually says, its what people get out of the bible
even post Christ, saint paul seemed to think that only peno-vaginal straight sex between man and woman was fine.
^for any media really
and that even then the world was still supposed to obey the man
it really is irrelivant what the bible actually says
their laws imposed the termination and lapidation of whoever wasn't etero sexual, however, we hardly see those laws put in act
also in ancient Greece it was normal to have homosexual partners
well the government can't enter the bedroom can it now
so at the time of the NT it was pretty fine
Halo, just because it has some morals we can benefit from doesnt mean it any less stupid
I call it dumb for blatant disrespect it shows for basic human rights and for containing impossible tales of magic
well, so was petrophilia
nonetheless it was still VERY taboo to be homosexual
no
"human rights"
not really
still is
ancient Greece is completely different from israel
it was very common in Greece and Rome
*looks who spread Christianity*
also even over there it was only fine if an older, dominant man expressed interest in a younger, submissive man
:3
yes daddy
so in that case the younger man would usually take the role of a woman
nah rome it was still a bit taboo i think
Greece was fine
nonono
many Greek legends had homosexual partners
like calling them gay would be a form of political slander i guess
Did you know a leading theory of why Phillip II, father to Alexander the great, was murdered was that he mistreated a former gay lover
in rome that is
Omeros
Odisseus
Achilles
well alexander was gay apparently
Phillip II
he had a thing for hephaestion
the true hero is Phillip II not Alexander
well it wasn't appropriate for a young man to be daddy to an older man halonest even in greece
it was more paedophilic tbh
not really homosexuality
๐
well, its both
its both
exactly i said it's more paedo than homo
greece saw young boys as woman i guess
women*
as in the submissive kind
meow
well than you agreed with me I guess
I never said it was ok to be a pedophile
meow
that gay shit < me
The gay has been stopped
are you homophobic? @HaloNest
hell no
good god keep pence out of my face
Lol
lmao
Snowflake
he's definitely gay
i mean the loudest homophobes are more likely to be gay than normal people
Evidence?
it's actually scientifically based
there was a study
I'd say Mike Pence is pretty straight
that those who ticked the most homophobic boxes, reacted the most sexually to gay porn
like their pee pees rose right up
the fact that there was a study means nothing really
many studies are proven wrong
Why did someone study this
all creationist studies for example
well idk
Whhyyyy
it's to analyse why people are so homophobic
it's to reaffirm to themselves that they think they're straight and good in god's eyes
I just think its nasty
i mean i was gay but i used to be pretty homophobic
it just was a way for old christian me to make myself feel better in god's eyes
I'm an atheist
That is invalid
and are you homophobic?
I've been called that
idk my thing was a reaction to social circumstances
im still called homophobic too
social circumstances being christian homophobia being strongly enforced on me
Just dont try to be gay with me
wow that's so homophobic i just can't ๐
Oof
idk why straight folk think that gay people try to hit on them
gay people have standards too you know?
Could've fooled me
I've seen pride parades
I regret doing so
lol
pride parades are a bit too extravagant some times i agree lol
not for where you live, they need it
I DON'T need to see it
My eyes hurt from that visit to California
why?
did you run bay to breakers and look back?
that is a bad idea
We stopped in San Francisco on the way to a national park
It was.... interesting
it is an interesting city
running bay to breakers was fun, you should try it
just dont look back
well @TheRockisCookin i live in india we don't really have pride parades as you guys do
Oh
Dont go to California
Lol
california is utopia for me lol
just. so. liberal.
It's going into the ocean
Even North America dosen't want it
ouch
better than alabama or something
Shmeh, only sanfran is so liberal
orange county does kinda neutralise it
didn't hillary win orange county though?
I mean, the cities are still liberal, just not as liberal as sanfran
Los Angeles is also pretty bad
Its the one I always hear about anyways
nirvana said god is gay at the end of "stay away"
๐คถ
<:ohheck:485078351162376202>
๐ฃ
@FilthyLeprechaun what is the point of you saying that?
Ariana Grande said God is a woman in her song
So either God is a lesbian or one of them isn't telling the truth
<:thonk:485324336874651650>
That's sexist
why do men get the pride of not having a non existent member that everyone deludes over?
#bathomet for all
@Mr.J ? ๐ What do you mean mein?
It's the shemale goat headed "satanic" form of God
@Toothcake would you like to continue here?
What do you wish to debate?
God is not a (((jew))).
God is beyond that, consider that he birthed us. Are you and I jews? No. To claim God is something so base is insulting and akin to claiming the sun is a Jesuit doing. Which it isn't.
There is only one who had conjured up the fearful idol of an all-devouring Moloch of which he was the priest and incarnation; the Judeo-Christian God is not one of Man, but one of the lesser beings of Earth who are extant, I fear, in the troubling implications of the Jew.
That implies there was something before Moloch. In the beginning there was nothing but God and then died to give us life to decide meaning and then when we inevitably die we will rejoin Him. To claim He, yes capital H He, is made up is to deny fundamental facts about the universe.
Moloch is eternal; Moloch is; Moloch was. Moloch will be for the fourth and final time. What is beyond this is a Jewish Question of freedom from the natural state of Man & the world.
You seem to be confused. There is *only* God. While the Jews seem to think there is a (((freedom))). Us in the know, know that in being in the know is the know that we are of God and when we all die we can finally unite with God and know peace. We are God's children. You denying our Celestial Daddy is just another edgy teenaged phase. I'm sorry I get so heated sometimes but God is not a laughing matter, we have to accept our fate.
Since ordinary explanations seem so inadequate for the abominations of Jewish rule, the transcendental-esoteric alternative is enticing. Degenerate, suggestive and seductive, rather than plainspoken and straightforward, filled with grandiose dreams and nebulous promises of an ineffable something that transcends everyday reality. The issue is not whether or not this is trueโthe only thing that is true is what is fought for, and what the victor writes.
Freemasonic, quasi-Marxist Liberal-Bolshevism engineered the idea of an equally-loving Creator-God. The truth is, only one had conjured up the fearful idol of an all-devouring Moloch of which he was the priest and incarnation.
God is not a jew? <:thonk:485324336874651650>
God devours all, he will accept us in the arms at the end. Your (((Devourer))) is the true Jesuit-Trickery. You've been fooled. While the communists reject God and attempt to substitute in a self-loving hedonistic gluton is laughable. God has died to bring us in and you insult Him by denying His Glory.
Sorry to burst in but hm
Read up, Soldz.
While Tooth is content to hide behind the fallible nature of words, I bask in the Eternal Glory of the One True God.
The only Thing that devours all is the Moloch; and the Moloch is the priest, the incarnation, the latent nature of Man manifest in the Fuhrer.
I wouldnt call God anything
Besides God
God cant be a Jew since he is Jesus, who is also the savior ๐ค
Not God the christian or the jew or the Muslim
Nice paradox
There is more to God than simple race rhetorics. While God is eternal and we may be as well, through our eternal-death. God made man is us all, but few of those do represent Him as well as the Fuhrer does. So we are in agreement in that.
who is the Fuhrer?
Charles Manson
I think she means father
Or he
Or them
Whatever your pronouns may be
As Tooth said.
is there something wrong with _jesuits_ now?
why Charles Manson?
@the boi The degeneratesโthey are in some ways worse than the Enemyโare pushing cannibalism of the spirit more than ever. (This is why the Jews eat the Body & Blood.) They are pushing the melding of ideas, cultures, peoples and lands more than ever.
? isnt it the Chrisitians who eat the body and blood
Cultural-Marxism, which is oft being pushed onto the feeble at the Academies are damaging even the family dynamics. We need a strong founding more than ever.
what's wrong with Jesuits?
Christians are just Jews with a Jew on a Cross.
Christ was a Christian.
they are fundamentally differnt
christ was a jew
at least his human form was
He was the founder of Christianity, thus no longer a Jew.
No, there is no strong founding; there is only the free fall from a trap-door, the plunging into a Great Darkness that the Jews have no sought, nor made, but are incarnate ofโa Darkness of Light.
if you believe he had a divine form, he would have no religion
i mean, i define a christian as someone who believes Christ died for their sins, so he cant be a Chrisitian in my definition of it
Wait do you guys not
nevermind
that just narrows him down to one specific religion
What is it Kitty?
nothing
You can tell us! c:
We're your friends.
i am just surprised you don't like
jews
when
7,669 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 7/31
| Next