lol wat

Then whats the point

Bible can't be corrupted but everything else outside of it can

Gotcha

like, i can use the bible to support slavery, but i can also use it to condone slavery

The holy spirit is running everyone up the wall then

the bible doesnt condone slavery

Yikes

i didnt say it did

i said you can use it to condone slavery

He isnt wrong

Everyone has a different point of view on the message

Apparently

He's correct the Bible even gives instructions on how to punish slaves

if the holy spirit leads you to believe something, it should line up with the entire bible

people who owned slaves and abolitionist both used the bible as support for their view

[Judges 21:25]

clearly one of them is wrong

Wrong one

the bible says if youre a slave, be a good slave

[Proverbs 21:2]

but if freedom is possible, seek it

ok, freedom wasnt possible for american slaves

you know about american slaves do you?

a decent amount

did you know more white people died to free black slaves than there were black slaves total in america

and whites were slaves

christians

ooo boi

i was waiting for that

wait no longer =]

a) your first fact is an out right lie

Whites were slaves?

prove it, go back to history

about 400,000-500,000 slaves were BROUGHT from africa

And you call yourself a christian

Oof goddamn

yes whites were slaves

Racist garbage

then a couple hundred thousand more were born in the US

You cant handle the truth

its ok its part of healing

<:thonk:485324336874651650>

ok, yes whites were slaves in some parts of the world, mainly in the mediteranian world

Nice shifting the goalpost though

but the scale was much smaller

i didnt shift a goal post, someone mentioned slaves in america

whites werent slaves in the US, there were indentured servants, which are differnt

and they tried using natives but that didnt work either

If you are talking about Irish "slaves" in America. They were under legal contact had basic human rights and could leave at the end of their contract and be given land. Whereas black slaves had no way of escape, their kids were also slaves and had no human rights

its called indentured servants

they work for a set time, usually around 7 years, then after that period they are garenteed some land and supplies

do you think im too silly to understand things?

i apperciate you trying to help\

[Leviticus 25:44]

Oops

We are cleaning up a common misconception, I hope you don't find this patronising

White people

no, i think its nice to talk to some caring people

so yeah, no white slaves in the US

None what so ever

If i remember right the hebrews started as indentured servants that became dependant on the egyptians

The Irish slaves thing is a common misconception often used to downplay the struggle of black people who were actually slaves

Egypt didnt have slave labor

And not white people

and the Hebrews were never in egypt

Try again

there were black slave owners

So what

just pointing that out

all we were talking about is slavery in general

Is this even about religion anymore

o i thouight this was a race thing

If Egyptians weren't white explain this

well clearly in the US it is a race thing

<:ohheck:485078351162376202>

You got me

because the slave owners were southern white men

*rich deep south white men

Deep men

where is your next piece moving to?

linguistic chess =]

i was being specific

My piece moves to Bible can be used to condone slavery and hence can very easily be corrupted

Richest deepest most southern whitest men

rich white men in the deep south had the majority of slaves

Southernest* @I-VaPE-ChEMtrAiLS

Piss

:P

if you only use eisogesis, its possible to get a false understanding of scripture

that it supported slavery?

yeah how dare i think that is wrong

lol

I mean when Bible tells us to "you may purchase slaves" I can really get to any other meaning

eisogesis is like taking youre ideas and bouncing them off of scriptures

You can also use the Bible to say the earth is 6000 years old and is flat