flat-earth
Discord ID: 484516084846952451
118,849 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 8/476
| Next
The way light works
what
ihave an ez debunk of flat earth using my genius intellect
1) you cannot trust the reliability of your senses. you could be in a matrix and the world you think you see could be merely a figment of your imagination. for instance, we could live in a computer simulation
2) because our senses may be unreliable, you cannot depend on observations as evidence that the Earth is flat. the Earth may not even exist, and may simply be an illusion
3) therefore, the assertion that the earth is flat can be rejected on the basis of insufficient evidence
ez pz gg
agnostic earther 1 flat earthers 0
nobody lol
now they showed up smh
http://prntscr.com/n2celt
dosent optical slant rely only on what the observers perspective is
wait who here believes that earth is flat?
@EliteGamer how bout direct measurements
why the fk am i not seeing printscreen pics show up wtfrig
taking 10 mins now -- smh... must be discord glitching up ugh..
you cannot trust direct measurements since they rely on your senses
FECORE Laser Level Experiments https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bV8hCkvT7gRFkoR6J0AY1mDwYfQR7PAg/view
Direct measurements dont rely on senses. Stop trolling @EliteGamer
ye sthey do, all observations rely on our senses. i hereby reject your evidence on the basis of unreliability
@Citizen Z because he presented an opinion or argument does not mean he's trolling btw
if hes wrong prove him wrong.
also if the earth is flat. how come we can only view certain stars at certain latitudes?
why can't we see some islands at the very top of moutains either, probably because the atmosphere blocks the light?
i dont really know lmao
also why do sunsets and sunrises happen at different times at different latitudes and longitudes?
all observations rely on the senses. it is impossible to observe measurements without perception
You have a lot of questions
yes
also how do seasons work on a flat earth?
along with day and night
Looking at a tape measures isnt relying on senses
yes, you are using your sense of vision sir. that is a sense
Did you watch the videos?
such as
i did not sir, it would not matter because vision may be an unreliable sense and thus cannot be trusted to make reliable observations
i actually don't think the earth is round lmao
it's an oblate spheriod
Proof?
it's essentially just round earth. but water at the poles is stretched because of rotation iirc
sir, please provide evidence that the Earth is flat, because so far your evidence has been rejected on the basis of unreliability
How many miles does the equator deviate from being a perfect sphere?
lemme check
it's very small
Yes..not detectable..unless your name is NASA
it's 13 miles at the equator
I mean with an image of the earth and some math you could calculate it
So you believe someone measured that?
it makes sense to me.
What image of earth?
the several found on google if you google earth
Send me a source link.
anyway if you take something and spin it it becomes stretched right?
the centrifugal force stretches it slightly.
sir you cannot know if the centrifugal forces stretch it slightly because your senses may be unreliable
If it had water on it and you spun something fast enough to stretch it, the water flys off.
that's a liquid
sir you cannot know if the water flys off because your senses may be unreliable
if you get a mushy sphere, fix it to something that spins it from the middle, and make sure it dosent fall off, it will stretch and flatten at it's poles, try it.
So you're saying earth is spinning fast enough and long enough to stretch rock?
yes. it's alledgly spinning at 1000mph and it's been spinning for billions of years alledgy.
How does the water stay?
gravity
gravitons
electromagnetic forces
Gravitons is a joke
yeah probably
gravity pushes it down to the earths core
but gravity is shown on any other body in space.
No
Gravity is a law within a theory
@nef gravity is not a push or a pull. Its considered the warping of space time and the attraction of two objects
it's probably the weakest force ever.
yes a pull force.
that's what a pull force is
it pulls stuff
No its not a pull force
why does it pull?
It doesn't
why do we orbit?
Prove it.
prove stuff orbits?
We dont orbit anything
prove it
oh yeah I forgot flat earth has it all above earth itself
sir as a flat earther it is your burden to provide evidence the earth is flat
Go outside and look
why is every other planet we view round btw
sir , i already told you that i reject observations because the senses may be unreliable
Logical fallacy. Assuming the consequence
wait what does the bottom of the earth look like if its flat?\
Saying something is round then saying that means another thing is round is illogical
why would earth be flat but nothing else be?
sir you are assuming the consequence when you assume your senses are reliable. please do not commit the fallacies you accuse others of committing
FECORE Laser Level Experiments https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bV8hCkvT7gRFkoR6J0AY1mDwYfQR7PAg/view
other flat earhters say it's water.
Not senses
Measurements
um without your senses we wouldent be able to prove anything
sir i reject the evidence in your link because the senses may be unreliable
senses are the only reason we can take measurments
!mute @EliteGamer
EliteGamer#0106 (457781352234876930) is now muted for '**Unspecified.**', alright? <:THUMBSUP6:403560443345371137>
Persistent debate trolls. Go somewhere else to argue. Im not here to have an endless debate.
Im willing to answer one question at a time but im not going to.be patronized or mocked nor will i entertain persistant debate here is what i think trolls.
luckily im not patronizing or mocking you
Never said you were
The other person was
me?
not sure who that was directed to so I just said regardless
anyway I'm gonna go play some war thunder you had some pretty good points @Citizen Z peace
Later
So this video is a ship sailing off into the horizon, you can see it doesn't fade off into the distance, it slowly sinks into the distance until you can only see the mast. When it sinks it's going along the Curvature of the earth
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Akip2Ev_N8
When the angular resolution limits of the eye or lens are reached, the light is no longer resolvable
This is how angular resolution works physically in the eye.
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/379214321907007488/459802853524111361/1_EN.png
Cameras work the same way.
The cones of the retina is a zoom in of the eye. If the angular size of the target is not enough to activate more than a single cones/sensor the object is unresolvable.
There are 3 ways to decrease angular separation.
1. Move the two separate targets further or closer together.
2.Increase the distance.
3. Change the angle of view.
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/379214321907007488/459805458644074511/angseperation.jpg
First here is a demonstration of how angle of view changes the angular separation of 2 targets. https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/379214321907007488/459806914331541504/unknown.png
For example in this image, as the stop sign's angular size shrinks from distance or angle, the image that prjected onto the retina also shrinks. Eventually it will reach such as small size the eye can not physically detect the light. https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/379214321907007488/459808085436006410/refraction_cornea.png
A geometric analogy would be closing a pair of scissors. When the scissor tips are closer together than the spacing between the rods and cones of the eye then you get to see the target. The point where the tips cross from too close to normal vision is the angular resolution.
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/379214321907007488/459817803038326784/unknown.png
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/379214321907007488/459818062858682368/65116694_resized550bbc_sg_g4_eye.png
When the angle of view becomes to much it pretty much goes parallel, but you lose sight of the ground before that. It's the same on the globe too but even worse because the angle of view is increasing quicker because of the curving away of the ball surface.
These next images show someone how the angle stays the same but the area that you are actually observing increases. You can see the 5th image how the bottom of a building would disappear.
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/379214321907007488/459819761644077057/unknown.png
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/379214321907007488/459813762132869126/ang1.png
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/379214321907007488/459813783464968206/ang2.png
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/379214321907007488/459813767576813578/ang4.png
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/379214321907007488/459813769548267542/ang5.png
Angular Resolution https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/458196098767388674/459052120495095818/Angular_Resolution_01_v001.webp
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/458196098767388674/459052123091632138/Angular_Resolution_02_v001.webp
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/458196098767388674/459052121896124436/Angular_Resolution_03_v002_1.webp
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/458196098767388674/459052121065783297/Angular_Resolution_04_v002.webp
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/458196098767388674/459052122537721856/Angular_Resolution_05_v004.webp
https://plus.google.com/116502556172406985386/posts/Qegqk1jSNEE
https://plus.google.com/116502556172406985386/posts/fzjPdL8H7FX
https://plus.google.com/116502556172406985386/posts/4D6qoxFBSEy
The cone does reverse inside the eye.
Light is projected on to the retina. We don't see things directly.
It goes through the lens is projected and inverted. https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/379214321907007488/466469361562026015/kan_ch26_f001.png https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/379214321907007488/466469513500688384/retinaimage.png Those images are right for a single point of light. This is part of another misconception. https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/379214321907007488/468563187713835020/unknown.png This illustrate how we would see a SINGLE point of light. Say a single photon reflecting off the molecule of a wall
Take notice how it emanates in a sphere. Now what we see is the light reflecting from EVERY molecule spherical , and traveling out. The important thing is this. The airy disks I started with.
That is what EACH point is.
Trillions (probably more) of points of light. We don't see each point. We can only differentiate points to the angular resolution limit.
So a trillion points in a 4 ft space at 3 miles looks like a point. Think of the horizon as a bunch of points of light, and not as a building , a boat or mountain.
Then equate an entire object to a point of light. As far as the angle goes. The angular size on an object has the same angular size when projected onto the retina.
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/379214321907007488/468565104326082575/unknown.png All those angles between features of objects in the room are identical to the angles of the corresponding projected image of that room. (projected onto the retina)
So something that is 10 ft in real life and has an angular size of 3 degrees. When projected to the retina it's angle is still 3 degrees but it's actual size is .5 mm
projected to the retina.
So knowing that angular size decrease with distance. When I get far enough away from that something and it's angular size shrinks outside AND inside my eye. Eventually the angle being projected on to the retina is too small for the cells and photoreceptors to form an image from. You have to think of it like this. Whatever we see or photograph whatever is being captured by the lens is being projected to the retina. Only it is a physically tiny version of what you are seeing. So if a building is "trillions" of points of light...each point of light on that building will come to the eye at a different angle. The bottom angles will be unresolvable before the top angles because they close sooner in the back of the eye or camera. The angle is tilted away more. Think of rotating a piece of paper. You hold the paper in front.
Rotate the top away until the sheet is parallel.
and you are looking down the edge.
Now imagine you put a circle on top and bottom of the sheet and did it all over again.
Before the tilting of the angle the spots would appear a good distance away from each other. But as you rotate the paper those 2 circles will appear to be close.
The top of a building is not rotated as much from the plane of the retina compared the the bottom at equal distances.
Look , these are the same distances. Obviously the angles are not the same. https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/379214321907007488/468569265574903818/unknown.png I can make it even more extreme... https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/379214321907007488/468569771735253012/unknown.png But guess what....the top of the building will get cut off. When the entire situation is reverse.
Image looking up with your chest up to the world trade center. You wouldn't see the top because the angle would be too shallow. https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/379214321907007488/468570710344728576/unknown.png Look what happens when you are closer to the vertical than the horizontal, the reverse. https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/379214321907007488/468570964817608715/unknown.png Here are some questions you can ask yourself. Where is the plane of the eye? What is the relative angle between the surface of target and the plane of the eye? Give that angle , what is the angular separation of the points of light on that target? https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/379214321907007488/468574743637786645/unknown.png The relative angle to the plane of the eye and the optical tilt of the target determine the angular separation
If I rotate the green block until it is vertical all the angle will grow. If I rotate it counter clockwise all the angles will shrink. If It was more to scale the angle difference would be more dramatic. https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/379214321907007488/468578052302176266/IMG_3195_one_world_trade_center_nyc2015_aagdolla-1038x576.jpg https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/379214321907007488/468578348789006336/502382332.jpg Now imagine the building is 3 miles tall and not 1776ft.
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/379214321907007488/468578739572441119/look-down-the-hallway.jpg So here is what happens being closer to one wall than the other. That shows the slant/tilt. Left wall angle is steeper than right wall, relative to the observer. This photo looking upward is a good example also. https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/379214321907007488/468579766983720980/OrganicMechanics101.JPG
Post 1 of 2
How angular resolution works:
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/379214321907007488/459818062858682368/65116694_resized550bbc_sg_g4_eye.png
The further an object (i.e. boat, building mountain) gets away from the lens, the angular separation will continue to close until the light blurs together and eventually becomes a line or point or edge"
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/379214321907007488/468546464780386306/Airy_disk_spacing_near_Rayleigh_criterion.png
"As he looks downward toward his feet the slant approaches zero, as he looks upward the slant increases, as the center of clear vision approaches the horizon the slant becomes maximal, and at the horizon itself the land ceases to be a surface and becomes an edge"
https://zdoc.site/gibson-1952-the-perceived-slant-of-visual-surfaces-citeseerx.html
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/458196098767388674/461973747197411339/Screenshot_20180628-121601_Drive.jpg
As you look down the right side of the hallway, you'll see the angular separation of light begins to close the further you look. Then looking at the left side of the hallway you'll notice the angular separation of light does not close or blur as quickly as the right side.
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/379214321907007488/468578739572441119/look-down-the-hallway.jpg
Post 2 of 2
Here are some questions you can ask yourself. Where is the plane of the eye? What is the relative angle between the surface of target and the plane of the eye? Given that angle , what is the angular separation of the points of light on that target?
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/419246750260264960/470518575698935808/unknown-65.png
Notice the blue cones angle compared to the orange cone. The blue cones angle will lose the light first on the bottom and the ground will start to blur with the object but if you raise in height the resolution will increase shown with the orange cone because the angle of light hitting the retina or camera is made larger. Once the angle becomes too shallow the light turns into a line or Edge. Think of buildings or boats or mountains not as objects but as quadrillions of points of light or photons coming to your retina at different angles and some will become non-resolvable before others. The ones closest to you disappear first as you back away. You will see the ground running up to the horizon then see the horizon as a line and will see things like the sky still or if there's a mountain or building you will still see the top parts but eventually those will also become unresolvable as they get further away and the angle changes.
wait @Citizen Z citizen are u a flat earther or a round?
and btw I said something about fading into the distance
im bringing up a topic lol
Which isn't what is happening
Its just visibility
watch the video
Like viewing a mountain
From far away
Sometimes they look blue
what mountain is blue?
Yes watch the video
If you view a mountain from far away they will start to blend with the sky
and?
Blue light is scattering out the light between you and the mountain
and how does that prove that the earth is flat?
It doesnt
It just proves you cant see infinite
Due to visibility
oh my other point
You were saying they were fading
Im saying thats because of visibility
Nothing more
Me: the thing im confused about is if the earth is flat wouldnt all the water leak off the edge?
you: who told you there is an edge?
me: so ur saying that earth is infinite?
you: who told you the earth had an edge or it is infinite?
Here are some questions you can ask yourself. Where is the plane of the eye? What is the relative angle between the surface of target and the plane of the eye? Given that angle , what is the angular separation of the points of light on that target.
Ive never been off north america. I don't know whats out there
okay viewing a mountain from far away it blends with the sky right?
Depends on that days weather conditions, the position of the sun, etc
.
at that time in the video u can still see the mast of the ship, its not blended, it sunk slong the curvature of the earth
So you didn't watch the optics video?
Nothing about blending
Its about optics
Blending is the visibility of the day
Optics im talking about is how light and the eye work
In conjunction
Imagine extending that 60 miles
The angle will become so shallow that the eye or lens will lose its ability to resolve objects in the cone
is this entire thing about earth being flat
yeah
ok
im a round earther
same
zdoc.site_gibson-1952-the-perceived-slant-of-visual-surfaces (1).pdf
this guy thinks that you cant perceive things as round if you are far away
it litterally shows the object dipping below the horizon in the gif
No
yes
It shows angular resolution
What does this mean?
its dipping below the horizon because when you look at it from far away it dips along the curvature of the earth
Says who?
says everybody except flat earthers
Its not dipping below any curve
yes it is
Ive just shown you
How light works
Your problem if you refuse to learn
We will have to agree to disagree
okay new topic how do tides work
Do you know amphidromic points are?
They are also known as tidal nodes
Its points around earth where the tides dont shift
If the moon was pulling the water why are these points scattered about?
Have you heard of Magnetohydrodynamics?
electrically conducted fluids
Which includes water
Saltwater
yes includes water
Just because i can prove the earth is flat it doesn't mean i have all the answers. Though i can guess like anyone else who is trying to figure things out
Tooken from an article
The tides are caused by the activity of the Earth magnet that is at the bottom of the sea. It causes the change of sea levels. So what about this "theory" that the tides are caused by the moon and the sun? By gravity? It's easily countered by the tidal map. If the general theory is correct, and Earth is indeed round, then the tidal map would be divided into four areas and in different colors, with two areas in full red-yellow [high tide] and the other two areas in full blue [low tide].
So they have a theory that is trying to explain the standard model.
Your point?
Im saying there is alternative theories
Moon attracting the water but nothing else doesnt even make sense
Thereโs no alternative theories because this was proven multiple times and thereโs way too much evidence for this to be just a theory
What evidence?
Show me please
When you have evidence that proves it let me know.
Well the moon has a very small pull on the earth as the sun has a large pull on the earth, thatโs why it orbits the sun. The moon canโt move the entire earth since itโs so small, but water, is quite weak and can be pushed around easily by such a large object pulling on it. That is why tides happen
wtf?
is this
Ik
is this flat earth
vs round earther?
Yeah
are u flat or roun
Iโm round weather
Weather
Nice
the earth is Round ;D
Earther
"ROunD
REEEE
Im big dumb
Wait gimme a sec, Iโm gonna walk my dog
ROund
Ok
*says the flat earther*
Lamp#3153 (383442842489716738) is now muted for '**bye**', alright? <:THUMBSUP6:403560443345371137>
<@438846436759699456> no more meaningless postings
>>ban <@438846436759699456> troll spammer
<:vSuccess:390202497827864597> Successfully banned <@438846436759699456>
Jump, you feel gravity, gravity in space made the other planets spherical, if that is true, our planet is spherical as well.
Simple as simple can be
Belief
Not even logical
wait, are you agreeing with me or disagreeing?
I believe you believe that
Didnt i ban you and your friends already today?
agree
flat, round
Believe what u want to idk why people are angry over peopleโs beliefs
118,849 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 8/476
| Next