flat-earth
Discord ID: 484516084846952451
118,849 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 310/1189
| Next
33 years
omg. I never realized that
33 degree masons
Hijackers were 33
yeah yeah sure
interesting
33 everywhere
yep
Freemasons. like Copernicus.....heliocentrism. separate the goyim from God
make us believe we are merely a cosmic accident
These people work by numbers and symbols. Truth in plain sight is mockery and their calling card
evolution
hey phd
yeah they do
Flat Earth you must live in a very scary and interesting world
Even the dome symbolism is everywhere
even in hollywood
What's done symbolism
how do I make so you guys can see
yeah they tell us everything in advance
hidden in plain sight
phd one intriguing thing i pointed out to someone once, about the pictures of rockets being fired up and coming back down. thats all happening within your small visual range, that youre seeing them come back down, so within a few miles
Ok so lucas film what do you see, dome with sun and moon
Yeah but what's done symbolism
Oh yeah flight paths arch
Yup
thats normal for the human eyesight right there
youve thrown a softball up into the air to someone else to catch before
see the arch as it goes up and comes back down
I've heard a theory they crash land in Bermuda triangle hence the try and dress it up like things vanish there and it's mysterious don't go! ...Shuttle graveyard
Or they just land in the ocean
hmm..interesting theory
I know they don't go i nspace though haha
for sure it's convenient that they launch from Florida ๐
Yup
and it's clear the Space Shuttle was total BS
there are good video clips of it landing and you can clearly hear the jet engines
You guys know why they launch from Florida right?
someone yesterday even said he found a clip of a Russian shuttle taking off from a runway ๐
The arch is accurate in mainstream science, though. That is, to get into orbit, you need to follow the curve.
Russia didn't have space shuttles
the one that goes up is a dummy. the one that lands is a dressed up jet
How is it shorter
drew thats flawed because the curve would be larger than the range of human eyesight, you wouldnt witness it
How do they hid the engines
Isn't counter productive to have your shuttle turn that way? Why not in a straight line and wait until the earth rotates into position your firing up to
Wdym?
and what pilots are going to routinely be happy with a dead stick landing in a brick
it's no glider
They have to fire backwards to lose orbital velocity
lol
And enter in at an angle so it don't burn up
Well since most of the payload they're carrying is fuel
If it's fuel it ain't payload
They look similar
What's your point
They even have different names
Yeah payload was wrong term
try to imagine what theyd look like when theyre older
The two black guys look nothing alike
The Asian dude turned into a Mexican ๐
I've seen the families react to that explosion too, some are trying to keep a straight face some laughing realizing they're not on camera
I'm not sure if that's entirely true - you can see the light from something that bright for quite a long way. I don't know the math or anything, but I don't find it unreasonable.
Like seriously
How in the heck did the Asian age into a mexican
Someone explain this
the mainstream story is that the "shuttle" or satellites are not in weightless space...but are basically constantly falling.
like shooting a cannon ball farther and farther until it eventually just keeps missing the earth
hence the arch path
yup!
Yes that's called centripidal acceleration
being able to see an arch all the way back to the ground within your range of vision....keep in mind that if theres curvature its too large to be able to see it like that
Or acceleration due to gravuty
or youre being inconsistent
Brothers i guess
and this model also explains why there are sooooo many examples of obviously faked NASA photos/videos
there would be no need for any of that otherwise
esp photoshopped earth images
Your right
So when it goes over the horizon that doesn't exactly mean it hits the ground
the funniest one is the moon transiting earth. supposedly the only one
Also how would you explain space x videos of launches
yeah i dont agree with you drew, it doesnt make sense
how could any reasonable person think this is real?
Fair enough, I can't demonstrate for certain myself
The picture of earth has changed multiple times, the size of whole continents
I can make a 3D simulation, but that's it
and I bet it would be 1000x better than this one ๐
the moon isn't even rotating as it should be
ive seen one of his creations
So many inconsistencies in the famous blue marble picture
118,849 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 310/1189
| Next