Ok vsauce

Lol

This is just logical

Entropy is high when a massive object is not spherical

There’s a reason why our sun, moon and every other planet is spherical

@Say i know that you do not know that.

What don’t i know @mrbizzy

if earth is spherical and there are other planets and they are too

Well i do know

We can verify these things

Go get a telescope if you want

hmm. does the FE model have an explanation for gravity acceleration? I'm relatively new to FE and I haven't really took that into account.

I’ve gotten no good explanation for it.

@Say can we be straight?! you (me too) interpret things

you see something, with or without a telescope, and your brain/mind interprets what it is that you see

And because you have no other/better explanation for stuff "falling" to the ground, you keep thinking that gravity exists and that somehow peoves that the earth is globe.

How are you supposed to interpret a circular projection with shadows consistent for a sphere, as well as a front and back side consistent with a spinning sphere?

That’s not why i believe gravity exists

There’s no other way to interpret the projectile motion of planets

The problem is that our intuition often leads us astray

It may appear that we live on a flat surface, but i dont think that’s the case

We need to have words to describe things so we can communicate. ok, let it be gravity, why not. But that does not mean the earth is a globe.

If gravity exists, something as massive as the earth should be spherical. So you need some sort of explanation as to why it’s not a sohere

That is IF you follow the mainstream explanation of what gravity is.

and so you stay in the loop

Gravity is a well-established phenomenon

We can show you how two masses interact with each other based on gravity

as for today, it is no secret any more, that noone can define what gravity is.

yes we observe that phenomenon

I can define what gravity is

you can define what you observe.

It’s the force between any two objects that have mass

ok, cool, i observe the same

The attractive force*

Like, we can literally model gravity with math

We have equations to explain this, that work 100% of the time

Gm1m2/r^2

The equation for the force of gravity between any two objects^

ok, it does

Gravity is an apparent force, not an actual force

Just gonna clarify that

But your statement that earth has to be a sphere just because we observe attractive force which is very apparent, no doubt, is no relevant

we do not know the real nature of our enviroment beyound our perception

We have physics. We can model this stuff.

Anything as massive as earth will inevitably become a sphere

This is simple thermodynamics

I will guess that you already have come accross the fact that most of the truth that we got learned is based on theories and assumptions that those theories might be correct

You understand that “theories” in science are **incredibly** reliable, right?

https://www.notjustatheory.com

This is for evolution ^ but it gets the same point across

@Say can you observe the moon right now?

No

Not right now, no.

i can. does it make earth a globe?

Not necessarily

You could claim a spotlight but you’d need a mechanism to explain such a phenomenon

^

Regardless of what flat earthers say, you would see infinitely far on a flat plane.

In the way we understand light to function, you need an explanation as to how the light from the sun doesn’t illuminate the whole earth at once

good. and so here is an explanation. and we all know it. it is spherical, the Moon circles the globe earth and so the story goes.

That is explanation of the phenomena.

But not the only one.

We literally just told you you’d need another explanation for the phenomenon

Yes we need the explanation, not that our lives depent on that. So lets find it

That’s as close to asking for the phenomenon as literally asking

You don’t have a possible explanation? What?

i want to be honest to myself and respect others too.

so yes, i have seen several explanations.

But all have some missing bits.

Provide them m8

You can’t just say “there are explanations”, you need to provide them

you mean the explanations?

How does our explanation “lack bits”

to satisfy your curiosity, regarding the moon, i have seen the mainstream one - that it is an object circling the earth.

then there is plasma version, spotlight version, firmament version

some are more crazy than others

I still want an answer as to how things accelerate downwards on a flat earth

Plasma is not an explanation, it doesn’t even address the conundrum of flat earth.
Spotlight has literally no mechanism for how light behaves that way.
Firmament... same issue

You got stuck in that flat earth mate

I’ve seen someone say it’s the water sound light thing which is a cool phenomenon

But why it’s so bright and large has never been addressed.

we the humans need to have the answers. but we do not. Theories have changed over the time because the old one got challenged.

so now is the process.

This is just a nirvahna fallacy

and those who challenge the mainstream views of how is the enviroment around us functioning realize that there is not much solid proof to those theories.

our discussion will not change that

Alright, there’s no point in having a convo if you’re not willing to engage in a discussion

will you not agree that your opinion is closed?

You know how the things here function?

but i do not know. so i open my mind and try to find out

Not because i want to convince anyone.

any of you wanna make me bevive in flat earth

On a FlEarth, for two places (Senegal and New Zealand), the sun appears to rise and set in the north

https://picsart.com/i/296516866135201

what would it change @OLD MELBY ?

nothin reall

then why put effort if it wont change a thing.

No

I wanted an explanation for acceleration on earth