Like Wikipedia ?

Alright

Do both parties agree on this rule?

NO

I agree, yes

in flat earth debate personal research generally means that someone did an "experiment" and saw the results they wanted by ignoring things or not understanding

either that or a flawed "experiment"

Wait where is Gwench

With hard proof and peer review i agree

so no personal research at all

Just @ her

Hard proof, reliable source, and peer reviewed

ZYes'

Yes*

hey Astra you'll do

Yes

you're a flat earther

wanna debate?

Sure

@×Iwnz× you can use wikipedia to look for references but not as an actual source

What the debate about?

@Hamburger Guy ok

Isn’t hamburger a FE?

Flat earth

our point

Sure

it's a globe

No I'm not

Good

glove lol

I'm an a-earther

I play both sides

what

Ok

Apparently he somehow believes the earth is a globe and flat

Btw peer review means no spamming random pictures

yeah

@Zaz does that mean atheists believe in God and no god?

Alright shall we begin?

Well I agree on both models of earth, Gravity crushes any sort of planet into a ball because of the pressure. There is more evidence on the flat earth.

Can I see some evidence?

Yes.

I'm curious

No ive said that about a opinion in the middle of the spectrum

Sure

In reality I do have a side but for now I am officially a neutral party

Gravity points towards round earth

Just for now

we have pictures of earth as well

Yes

It's not CGI

not to mention peer reviewed methods of finding that out on the ground

For an atheist they are believing one thing not neutral or both

Earth pictures = cgi

nope

It’s been proven

can we see some evidence?

By billions

@Hamburger Guy what is your party then?

Sure

What proof?

Btw you obviously do not need peer review if both parties agree

by BILLIONS?!

@Zaz I'm a referee

@Muncher any links?

Hello globbies

hey fellow glober

If you really do have a party then its hard to trust you to be impartial

But you don't know my party

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=GrihjP5tTTM

I admire the thiccness of our fellow bae earth

@Muncher is that a peer review

@Le boy earth too thicc

It doesn’t matter what your party is

As I said before youtube is not a source

If you have a party

Idk is it @Hamburger Guy

To thicc to measure it's thiccness

It draws you to be biased

You can check the description

neither is non-empirical non-peer reviewed self-research some random guy did

that's experimentation. in the first hand

hahaha

YouTube - Someone who has studied many sources to explain their beliefs.

Looking at the horizon isn't how the scientific method is used

USE MATH

SRSLY

that's a video that actually PROVES GLOBE EARTh

First of all, does everybody know what peer review is?

Did you not check the video yourself

With a bike and two sticks @void creature

Those are some types of experiments

Oooh Astra you a simulation earther!!!??

They do

Yes @Le boy

Alex Chertnik
Published on Aug 1, 2016
in CONCLUSION:
Observations over water from 3 different locations showed CURVATURE that MATCH the calculations of EARTH as a SPHERE with radius of 6371 km.

in the description of the video

wait a second

:"in CONCLUSION:
Observations over water from 3 different locations showed CURVATURE that MATCH the calculations of EARTH as a SPHERE with radius of 6371 km."

Oml