Busy day

You think this is made up?

But yeah until I see scientific method experimental evidence of your "g" I'm going to discount it

You do realise that this equation is verified, right?

So verify g for me please

g is just downwards acceleration.

You can measure that by dropping stuff from a set height.

GRAVITY DROP SOMETHING FLIES UP: https://imgur.com/a/0gpjvOK

so g = about + 2 m/s^2 yes?

That's accelerating upwards isn't it?

Yeah thought so

That's disregarding air resistance, buoyancy, etc.

Sorry I want cause and effect scientific method experimental evidence, I don't want your beliefs

I am looking at acceleration here

I can show you very clear evidence changing densities changes acceleration

It's just a belief that stuff accelerates at 9.8 in a vacuum?

And yes, nobody denies that buoyancy exists.

Same as sitting on a chair can bring your acceleration to 0.

That brings us to Sheeple's 2nd law of accelerationism

2. CHANGING THE DENSITY OF THE MEDIUM: https://imgur.com/i0Cww6Y

```in a vacuum```

that's changing the density of the medium

https://youtu.be/2hBDTh1PUK0

Watch closely

they do not accelerate at the same rate

Ah yes, I've seen this before.

However I would argue the bowling ball and the feather have more similar body density to medium density ratios

in a vacuum

There's this thing called elastic energy.

Nobody's ever observed a perfect vacuum, only ever degrees of parital pressure

Nevertheless archimedes principle is not in violation

You are dropping two very dense objects in a very not dense medium

likewise if you drop a not very dense object in a dense medium such as the aluminium sheet in the container of sulfur hexafluoride, it floats

so before I address the feather, tell me, what provides the downwards force to being with?

force = mass times acceleration, can we deal with the acceleration please?

Yes.

sure so you agree that by changing either the density of the body or changing the density of the medium can cause a change in acceleration even direction of accelration yes?

Yes, a change in net force will change net acceleration.

cause = changing the density of something by attaching helium/hydrogen/deuterium/tritium/helium-3 balloons to ones self.

effect = changing in direction of acceleration

No

well force is a byproduct of acceleration, so I want to talk just about the acceleration please.

Cause: providing upwards force to overcome downwards.

But yes, lets continue

Yeah I'm not interested in forced thank you, I'm talking about sheeple's laws of accelerationism

Lol grabbity forgets to grab helium but somehow makes the atmosphere stick like velcro and prevents it from rushing into a empty space

acceleration is a fundamental component of force

force is not the cause of acceleration

@Hamburger Guy 😂

Try helium in a vacuum.

force is a byproduct of mass and acceleration

Density then

Actually, force IS the cause of acceleration.

9. WAVE PROPULSION: https://imgur.com/BOi8zNF

No it's really not

EM waves have ZERO mass

force is mass times acceleration

no mass yet acceleration occurs

So @Ivan Pavlovich I'm sorry you're wrong

What acceleration?

Do you see the object moving as a result of being shot at with a laser?

lasers emit light or infra red waves

Yeah, waves have energy and they can transfer that.

so it's not a force then is it

It is.

force is mass times acceleration, what's anything times zero @Ivan Pavlovich ?

zero

zero force yet an acceleration occurs

The LIGHT has 0 mass, not the object being pushed.

force is a byproduct of accelertiaon, accelration is not a by product of force

so can you please shut up about forces now you've been proven WRONG

?

F = ma
Therefore a = F/m
m = F/a
You could also say that a stationary cube has no acceleration, and their mass cannot be calculated as you cannot divide by 0 so it cannot exist

This kind of reasoning does not work

I haven't been proven wrong, but we might as well move on.

We're talkign about acceleration and @Ivan Pavlovich keeps insisiting a force is required, it's really not

Can't you use p = f*v and disregard the mass term

But mass is part of the relationship between both

How can you have a force with zero mass @Ivan Pavlovich ?

Yes

How much does a beam of light weigh?

How can you have a mass with no acceleration?

Same equation

Same logic

Ok, so you're confusing the light with the object that's being pushed.

object being pushed by light with zero mass

The acceleration _of the object_ is what matters

@Syntax Thank you, can you tell @Ivan Pavlovich that please

F = ma refers to the object being pushed, not the pusher.

What I was saying is actually going against your line of reasoning

because I swear to god if this zombie doesn't shut up about his forces I'm going to kick him, a zero sum force that creates an acceleration such shit

Censorship.

You can't use the equation to argue that way
Rearrange the equation and your logic causes the value of mass to be uncalculatable

ANYWAYS, let's move on

For real this time

3. APPLICATION OF PRESSURE VECTORS https://imgur.com/a/g6eAkG6

Hmm
sorry

The woman is accelerating

But I don't see any mass pushing that woman

Isn't that just drag, how does that relate to gravity