<:XMARK6:403540169992568833> **lichtwink +**, this command is disabled in this channel

@eletrick33 yas

but to the ligt it is a strate way

God I love kelly clarkson

hi

no

no what

ok

k

Jeremiah 33:3

**Jeremiah 33:3 - King James Version with Apocrypha (KJVA)**

```Dust


<3> Call unto me, and I will answer thee, and show thee great and mighty things, which thou knowest not. ```

https://youtu.be/tvT40aCNMKM

https://discord.gg

<:CHECK6:403540120181145611> @asian John Wickツ has been warned
```
reason: Posted an invite
```

<:CHECK6:403540120181145611> @asian John Wickツ has been warned
```
reason: Posted an invite
```

@Derek Nelson how do you know what the stars looked like 5000 years ago

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astrolabe

Certainly good evidence stars haven't moved in more than 1000 years

@p0z well, 5000 years is not much in the grand scheme of things and not much change has happened in that time , but yes, in modern science the stars have changed

Hey my fellow flatties

@Human Sheeple the Stars never move because they are just marks on the done that surrounds the flat Earth

and you are not gonna see almost any change in such a miniscule time of 1000 years

If the Stars were real we would@Nico2020

why?

That is just what governments tell us to justify their false round earth

It's not flat, it's mostly flat

How so

It used to be flat then we dumepd all the plastic in the ocean

but @JoeAlf , why would we see significant movement in such a short time

the flat earthers are in denial of this

so the plastic made it curve?

the globe earthers seem to think the water bends, it doesn't the plastic in the ocean is rife

the plastic is curved

@Nico2020 there is a clear contradiction in what we are falsely taught, they say that some stars move incredibly fast yet in over 2000 years there is still no change

we ae also moving........ with most of the stars

there are also large distances...........

Not as fast supposedly

@Human Sheeple , wat does plastic in the ocean have to do with the flat or globe earth?

Heliocentrism says we are moving over 2,800,000 miles per hour. We can’t breathe at a fraction of that speed even in a contained environment like a jet.

but we are also moving at that speed, like taking a breath on a bullet train, not hard to do in the slightest as the air moves with the train

If the train is moving 5,000 mph? Yeah, you can’t breathe, even if your speed is constant.

why not?

i don't see why you would not be able if you are moving at the same speed

Your lungs are not strong enough even in the slightest

but you are going the same speed

like on the highway, the car next to you only looks like it would be going like 2kp/h if there was no background

a person prone to motion sickness that sits in a car travelling at 100mph is also going at the same speed as the car yet they only get motion sick while in the car

why don't they get motion sick when they're not in a car if the earth is in motion

do you know how motion sickness works?

i haven't studied it indepth but the term kind of speaks for itself doesn't it

it is not to do with speed

it is to do with acceleration only?

no

when your eyes and ears don't send the same info

the liquids in your ears

Hi

If we were moving at the that speed our ears and eyes wouldn't send the same info

The point is, even getting up to a speed of 5,000 mph, would cause you to pass out. NASA’s shuttle launches have shown a different experience where astronauts somehow do not struggle breathing in getting up to speed. https://youtu.be/HmikjomAkBc

Proving nasa is in fact, lying.

they cant breath because they are not strong enough to handle the G's

Because that air force pilot, along with every other one that has been tested in an environment getting up to speed, struggles breathing, or straight up passes out.

How does nasa do it then?

Because their pilots do not struggle breathing at all.

bc they don't get those sorts of G's in those directions

Are those the astronots you're referring to?

That is an air force pilot I linked.

If we where moving so fast why should we still have an atmosphere?

@Nico2020 that sounds like bullshit

what would strip the atmosphere off??

How can you get gas only in some directions

*gs

"Komets" loose their ice too

Astronauts really only have G's when they go up that are significant

and they train for them

think don't think i quite understand the question

You can't train to breathe when it is physically impossible

you can get stronger can u not?

Not that strong

how much force is in a launch?

https://youtu.be/fXnHHyvkytw

anyway, i think Astronauts sometimes get knocked out

11:37 in that video, those astronauts experience nothing similar to Air Force pilots.

The only reason can be, is because they’re faking it.

or that air force pilots have more G's they have to deal with? and all the force is going straight into the back of the chair.

The force still goes through them

They are made of matter

Or affects them

It does not simply ignore them because of the chair

it looks like they are bracing for it and during it

They would still be crushed

The force is stronger than any human body could withstand

why do you say that

it is not like the force is on top of them, it is in them

Firstly the force is exponentially stronger than that exerted on the air Force pilots

Therefore do you not think it would affect the astronauts

how much for air force pilots?

looks like air force pilots can pull 9 G's

Astronauts normally experience a maximum g-force of around 3gs during a rocket launch

that's not that much compared

humans normally black out at 9 G's

That is certainly false

Think about the speed, mass and direction

look at the vid Derek sent, the pilot blacks out at like 7 G's

and looked mostly fine up until that point

Even at 3G’s, if you think you can hang onto a notebook pad that isn’t tied down, you’re not being realistic.

it was one page it looked like that was off to the side, not much force

It was not one page..

leme see agine

And yeah, they were barely hanging onto it.. At 3G’s..

That makes no sense.

the cover and like 2 pages

3 G's is not too much, far less then me holding onto a phone, and holding onto my laptop in the same position, i can still do it with relative ease

The pad would slam to the back of the shuttle in no time at 3G’s..

Don’t give me that crap.

Your imagination is clearly out of sync with reality.

3G's is about 3 times the gravity of earth, my laptop is much more then 3 time that of my phone

https://youtu.be/tsSG07jGKjQ

This pilot tops out at about 4.96 G’.

She clearly can barely breathe.

The astronauts do not struggle At All.

she was getting her breath at 3 G's relatively ok

And my bad she gets close to 6G’s.

she was fine at 7.5 G's at 19 mins

fine = not blacked out

You’re missing the effing point.

The astronauts do not struggle at all. While being in a shuttle that supposedly gets up to 17,000 mph in 4 minutes.

the astronauts do not look like they don't struggle to me

Prove they struggle at all.

Whatsoever.

they have their hands bracing, and strong on their body, or on a near object, implying they are struggling

Your denial of reality is astounding.

how re they not struggling ???

i can not see it

I see people that look like they can breathe, move around at will, and even take time to jot down freaking notes.

Get real. Please.

Never mind that the air force can’t do this. But NASA can. Because imagination trumps reality.

i see them struggle until they stop the engines to reposition the rocket, you can here it on coms

I see actors pretending they struggle. There’s no way an astronaut can simply hang onto a notepad while bursting from standstill to 3 Gs’. The pad itself shows no sign of it being forced backward at all. All it does is bounce around a little bit. That’s like saying a notepad on the dash of a drag car would just bounce around, and not fly off.

Hello

That’s not how you hold a gun.

Ha?

You hold it like this.

Or holstered like this.

Guys Flat earth is common sense but guns are not making you save... I live in germany we are not allowed to have guns and they are no problem here... I wonder why that is?

If you are anti gun you are pro war

?

US are in much more wars...

How long has Germany been paying war reparations now

France, Denmark, Spain

Uk

Portugal

you pro guns guys are as stubborn as Globeheads

@King DADDY please dont get on the level of globeheads and just ghost...

anyone?

The US military industrial complex that provokes foreign wars, shouldn’t be confused with the right of law abiding citizens to keep and Bear arms. They are entirely separate issues.

Hi

Hi

Not what i meant i just wanted to show him that anti gun is not pro war

Passing gun control laws don’t disarm criminals. They disarm people who obey laws.

Is this a flat earth server or a gun control server

It’s a truth server.

But why dont we have a fraction of gun deaths in europe?

in germany the police fired a total of 86 shots in 2015 or so in a shooting in texas the same year the police shot about 90 rounds

I wonder why that is

If a person kills someone with their car, do you outlaw cars? No. You blame the person. Your example is like saying why aren’t there any car related homicides in an area that has outlawed cars.

It doesn’t mean your homicide rate has dropped. Because it hasn’t.

No because cars main objective is not to kill someone

guns are made to kill

They’re made for self defense against a person intending you harm.

It did not drop because guns never where legal

ok but no

<:trolled:555217274907262976>

I'm about to say it

3

2

1

Wow

Does an unarmed woman have a better chance at defending herself against rapists, robbers, and the like, more than an armed woman?

pepperspray

knifes

So that’s a no.

yes she has

wait not better but equal

Not even close to equal.

dude have you ever gotten peppersprayed?

If a rapist has a knife, and a woman has a knife, is there an equal chance for her to defend herself versus having a firearm?

if he has a gun if she has a gun it es equal too

she would propably not even shoot

because most humans have this barrier

Either way, a person would think twice if he thinks she has a gun. A woman with pepperspray is not nearly effective as a deterrent, especially if the man thinks all he has to do is quickly overpower her.

I understand in the EU you’re basically brainwashed about this. That’s unfortunate.

if you miss with the gun thats it... pepperspray can be sprayed for about 10 sec and has much more volume to hit someone

I’m not going to argue with your imagination.

then argue with me

because we are talking

Could this police officer have stopped an armed intruder with a knife?

NO.

I know I can beg for change on the street and maybe I can save up enough money to buy some GMO food that will give me cancer

I am not saying that we schould disarm the police

what the hell

but the gunman

We shouldn’t be disarming law abiding citizens either that can protect themselves just fine.

was that guy a law abiding citizen?

You don’t wait 5-10 minutes for police to arrive in a Scenario where you need a means of defense immediately.

Obviously not.

Why don't the pedophile politicians obey the law?

Why don't the theiving bankers obey the law?

Why don't the sadistic police obey the law?

And would gun control laws stop him from having guns? No.

you know what we dont need to call the police because it does not happen here

Why don't the genocidal doctors obey the law?

Why don't the lying lawyers obey the law?

Why don't the murderous military obey the law?

Why don't the corporations obey the law?

it would stop him

because as I said we dont have that problem here and that is not because guns are legal

I mean bring one or two good arguments

I like guns, they look nice and shooting is fun. I'm not very educated in this but I don't think the problems is guns, it's the people using them. Here where I live you need a license to own a gun.

I'm glad they put a hot chick on that poster otherwise I never would have believed it

The government gives themselves legal authority to own guns to shoot people dead and they've made murder legal as long as the government murders you, then it's not murder it's
a) Police shooting
b) Combat
c) War
d) "suicide"

did you just roast clinton lol

good one

and you having guns changes what?

the odds of getting killed are getting higher

what happens when the police stops your car? what is the first thing the officer says to you?

oi m8 you got a loicens

good

and then you make a sudden movement to get it

jk I don't live in the UK

good one👍 😂

now seriosly

yeah if a cop asked for my loicens i'd get it

and gib to him

ok

i mean if the cop shoots me for getting put

getting out my license