supposedly got to the moon in 69 thru 72

haven't been back since

you never said why we would go back

we have a better reason to go back to the moon than we would for shooting a car into space

@Livxly Dxll Okay, so what if I claim that the fact we went to the Moon is brute? That we just have?

rockets just don't work in space

a) that was SpaceX and Elon Musk's massive ego b) there is none, glad we can sort that out

Isnt Elon Musk going to send a bunch of artists up or somethin?

he can send a football team up into space, that doesn't mean that they are going there

it just means that people can be tricked

i dont really give a fuck about Musk, he is over hyped and has a massive ego

haha and he smokes weed so

don't listen to him

nothing wrong with weed kitty

You can say that about any rich businessmen really...

Typical weed people

according to Musk, it has to be real because it looks so fake

smoake woad

😂

👌

why were all the moon stuff filmed in black and white?

we had color back when it was filmed

<:smart:484956754489376781>

because color takes up more space on film and is more exspensive

and the cameras are bigger

and more exspensive

or it looks more realistic in black and white

expense wasn't an issue

True that

weight was an issue

tru

the hell are you on about, more expensive? They spent like 140billion

163*

why does it not seem like there is a gravity issue on the moon in the footage?

yeah and color cameras/film would be a needless exspense

you double the speed of the film and it looks like its filmed on earth

why does it look like the people filmed on the moon have harnesses attached to them

one can be spotted being lifted by it when he falls

Good example of wires here https://youtu.be/Zz9Bzi_GyD0

he goes from a kneeling position to a standing position without help from the other astronaut and clearly not his own power

Needless expense? Are you kidding me? It's humanity's supposed greatest accomplishment, like they're supposed to land on the moon and they should've also included the colored cameras too, which they previously even used on earth to film some of their test footages? I'll tell you why they didn't include it and it's because it's easier to fake the footage and make people not focus too much on the questionable details that people pointed out.

its also a lot heavier the a black and white camera

We're talking about 163 billion here, like you can't even fanthom or even have a picture of how much money that actually is and for the time, you could get a lot done with that.

they are trying to trick people, black and white seems more realistic

ok, just ignore the other thing i brought up, cool

also, where is this $163 billion coming from?

you can add color post production too

i am not citizing i am just curious where it is from and how long period

From mostly the popular/mainstream websites, you can check christopherrcooper and there are also various charts

many non filmed black and white films were added color after the fact

i have found the apollo program cost 100 billion

Space Shuttle 200

Space Station 70

Exploration 50

https://history.nasa.gov/SP-4029/Apollo_18-16_Apollo_Program_Budget_Appropriations.htm

Prices prices

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PT3ferYrmgU

interesting, thank you light

but, again you said nothing about my claim they are heavier

shadows show its filmed on a movie set

movie/stages arent lit from the side

they are when they trying to fake the sun

<:GWqlabsHyperSweats:398950682834763788>

so flat earthers have started filming horizon in infrared

can see 475 miles away?

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cwuxNdg8dTE> for reference this is the video of globe busters with this pic in it

Flat Earth - I Can See for Miles and Miles...

**Apollo 11** A comprehensive set of camera equipment was carried on board Apollo 11. **This included two 16mm Maurer motion picture film cameras, a color television camera in the orbiting Columbia**, and a *black and white TV camera outside of the lunar module to transmit to Earth Neil Armstrong's first steps on the Moon's surface.* A Kodak stereo close-up camera was used to film the lunar soil from only inches away. Three Hasselblad 500EL cameras were carried.

ok, how about the transmission equipment

Looks like Mars - do like NASA and "add" red tint to "view what it looks like"

cause if i remember correctly the way they had to trasmite the data was in a weird frequency

its all lies

NASA lies

Those cameras that they used, including the dual 16mm Maurer motion picture film cameras were already huge by themselves, and they don't look that bigger compared to the other ones that they carried. As far as the transmission equipment goes, the whole supposed conversation from the Moon into the Oval office is not only virtually impossible at the time, but it's still impossible now. You can't even get some signal in some areas of the earth, let alone try doing it from the Moon.

constantly

and consistantly

wasnt it sent to australia first then the signal was played on a screen, then that was filmed on regualr TV frequency and that broadcast

that is why the picture looks weird for the landing

I like how Nixon has a normal convo with these astronauts when they are on the moon and now they are under a 10 sec delay to the ISS

someone tell NASA that the moon is further than 250 miles of ISS

Data Storage Equipment (DSE). To make the supposed recordings possible, they claim that they used something called a Data Storage Electronics Assembly, which even if you look into the official explanation, they're trying to explain it away how it should've been virtually impossible, but due to certain atmosphrenic circumstances, it was able to and I quote; *As a result, many of its recordings are barely, if at all, audible, with a constant high-pitched background tone. In the attached database, the recordings that are virtually inaudible are highlighted*

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tG6yTft6Cfw

Nope, they didn't go to the moon, its pretty obvious

I mean it's impossible with all the technology and improvements we have made so far upto late 2018 into transmitters, strenghtening the signals in-between access points, etc...so to think that, they easily pulled something like that back in the late 60s/early 70s, it just doesn't add up.

👏

NASA LIES +1

And to make my self clear, this has nothing to do with the shape of the earth argument, which is what most people turn it into. People are still free to to think that they have scientific resources to back up the sphericity of the Earth, like that is not the point when it comes to the moon landings.

Van allen radiation belt we cannot get past, lost telemetry data on man's greatest accomplishment....

People are entitled to think as they wish, it's none of my business.

well, there is a reason why we cannot get to the moon

Fimament blocks us from getting out of enclosed system

o yeah, i agree, nothing to do with the shape of the earth

We have a ceiling

~~also if you dont think what i think you are wrong and stupid~~

I never said that

At the end of the day, we are born here and we die here...most of us won't go beyond 35k feet of altitude.

<:thonk:485324336874651650>

just buy an SR-71