Prove me wrong?

and dont bring up a fan in a vacuum

what about their parabolic arc that has them crashing into the ocean

That is the booster falling back down isnt it?

Orbital Mechanics anyone?

Usually a smaller capsule is what goes out.

Or up into the dome, or wherever.

I don't know.

I just don't find the rocket argument convincing.

you can see the light source of the rocket, its crashing into the ocean

kevin, i still want a diagram showing the forces of how a rocket propels stuff forward

How else would we have images like this

oh noo

I am asking legitimately

I don't understand

Im going to wait for Kevin to answer

CGI images, those are all fake

lol

im psychic or somethin

what about the rover

it's filmed on earth

they matched the ground that rover was shot in with earth ground with a red filter over it to give it that look

where on earth does that geology exists

i want proof kevin

i am sure you are right

but i want to have evidence

that image looks very distorted

it is a wide field of view i think

like a panorama

the rover has multiple cameras on it, yes

thats a rock

Nice squirrel

i dont know many animals that have their arms connected along the entire length with the neck

Looks pretty much like the other squirrel

it might be dead and just has its arm forward where it died

That too

or its sleeping

in the better pictures i have seen of the rock, it is smooth, no fur

hmm

hmm?

why u delet

it probably is a gopher that they want to pretend is a rock

lol

Pareidolia (/pærɪˈdoʊliə/ parr-i-DOH-lee-ə) is a psychological phenomenon in which the mind responds to a stimulus, usually an image or a sound, by perceiving a familiar pattern where none exists.

basically its not good proof

because the article is saying that all the things people think they see are just rocks or other geographic land marks

I believe that is a real gopher, but its not solid proof which I have seen already

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aegruALVb-U

why would a squirrel want to look like a rock

somewhere in the 3 and half hour video is proof that mars is a hoax

its either a live squirrel or not

its not a choice

and animals pretend to be stuff for camoflauge all the time

Looks like a dead squirrel to me and trust me, you can see here dead ones on a weekly basis, like they mainly can be found dead around the roads and no the vehicles that hit them, they don't stop or think twice about it.

when is the last time you seen a squirrel try an camoflauge with a rock

well, I just saw a ground hog pretending to be one ;/

so like today

ok but let us use occam's razor

pfff

what is more likely: the rock is smooth

or: mars is fake

all the ground hogs i see dont give a fuck about people

I think other factors need to be considered

why haven't we been to the moon in nearly 50 years

cause there is no need to go to the moon

Squirrels are usually grey, but they have lots of brown hair on their coats...they can be harder to spot around desert areas.

why wasn't the massive radiation a problem for the 5 or 6 trips to the moon

well no peper he has a point there

we havent been to the moon in 50 years because we never went

the only way we could have gone is if we had outside influence

Why would we need to keep going

...

i dont know just to check

check what?

that its still there idk

we shot a car into space for shits and giggles?

really?

All the telemetry data just disappeared into thin air apparently

telemetry data never existed

easier to just say the data is gone than try to fake it

we can check the moon is there without sending people there

That's not the point. No one is saying that the Moon doesn't exist, the argument is about how no one has actually ever physically been able to contact it,

like some would argue that it's not even solid.

the point is, there is no reason to go back after the Apollo missions

Apollo (the sun masculine deity) landing on the feminine (godess) deity of the moon has also Esoteric significance, the point was never about actually physically landing upon anything...they've admitted that they've lost the technology and that they simply can't go back, like either they did go there or they didn't, so it's good to actually look at the reasons as to why they didn't, because of what, etc....instead of just thinking that they did, because that's what's told in the textbooks.

no, we can rebuild everything

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qG6E0rjW1I0 in this video they are going thru many problems with the mars expeditition

appearantly some rock got in the way, so it was moved

we just dont have the infustructure RIGHT THIS SECOND to do it

easy to do when your on earth and pretending to be on mars

like, the factories were retooled

the launch stations reused or decommisioned

People can believe that they did, I don't have issues with people just believing in things, but if one claims that it's irrefutable and they conclusively went there, well...that's pretty much the height of ignorance.. They supposedly accomplished it in the late 50s and yet, now that technology has been lost.

You do realize you're just engaging in pig-headed skepticism?

the technology as in the physical things were either a) used up, like the rockets b)retooled, the factories c) decommisioned, the launch aperatious

It's good to point out bullshit, when you realize that it is actually bullshit. Like it has nothing to do with the shape of the earth, I've talked with many Globers who have concluded that the Apollo missions were fishy to say the least.