wasnt it sent to australia first then the signal was played on a screen, then that was filmed on regualr TV frequency and that broadcast

that is why the picture looks weird for the landing

I like how Nixon has a normal convo with these astronauts when they are on the moon and now they are under a 10 sec delay to the ISS

someone tell NASA that the moon is further than 250 miles of ISS

Data Storage Equipment (DSE). To make the supposed recordings possible, they claim that they used something called a Data Storage Electronics Assembly, which even if you look into the official explanation, they're trying to explain it away how it should've been virtually impossible, but due to certain atmosphrenic circumstances, it was able to and I quote; *As a result, many of its recordings are barely, if at all, audible, with a constant high-pitched background tone. In the attached database, the recordings that are virtually inaudible are highlighted*

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tG6yTft6Cfw

Nope, they didn't go to the moon, its pretty obvious

I mean it's impossible with all the technology and improvements we have made so far upto late 2018 into transmitters, strenghtening the signals in-between access points, etc...so to think that, they easily pulled something like that back in the late 60s/early 70s, it just doesn't add up.

👏

NASA LIES +1

And to make my self clear, this has nothing to do with the shape of the earth argument, which is what most people turn it into. People are still free to to think that they have scientific resources to back up the sphericity of the Earth, like that is not the point when it comes to the moon landings.

Van allen radiation belt we cannot get past, lost telemetry data on man's greatest accomplishment....

People are entitled to think as they wish, it's none of my business.

well, there is a reason why we cannot get to the moon

Fimament blocks us from getting out of enclosed system

o yeah, i agree, nothing to do with the shape of the earth

We have a ceiling

~~also if you dont think what i think you are wrong and stupid~~

I never said that

At the end of the day, we are born here and we die here...most of us won't go beyond 35k feet of altitude.

<:thonk:485324336874651650>

just buy an SR-71

simple

Better to know the truth dying then die blind

I think one of the strongest elements that we have is the fact that globes were put into brainwash centers/schools to indoctrinate young minds who believe in santa clause to also believe in the fake globe

if it was real, you wouldn't have to put globes into schools

eh, better eat good food

its fake, they want to brainwash you early

Speaking of food, I definitely need to spoil myself with some good food today

they don't have good arguements for us to actually be on a globe, you look at the arguements for and against and its clearly the case that we live on flat earth is overwhelmingly abundant

whlie living on a globe is flimsy and easily disproved

i am slightly bumbed my dorm doesnt access to an oven

the whole ship myth is just that, its fake like the globe

you can zoom in on ships that go over a fake horizon from limited human view proving this is not a valid proof that we live on a globe, but instead that we live on a flat earth

i like making cupcakes v.v

we can see too far

Sweet cupcakes

yes

Sinking Ship Effect:

The horizon on a flat plane is a consequence of the plane meeting the observer’s line of sight at less than a minute of a degree. The ground is not visible beyond that point, because the angle of view is too shallow. However, the angle of a line straight through the mast and top of the boat form a broader angle and so can be seen while the ground is not visible, so the boat disappears below the horizon bottom first. Eventually, the angle becomes too shallow to resolve the entire boat, when the top of the boat makes an angle with the plane at less than a minute of a degree.

It is verifiable that increasing resolution actually can restore the hulls of ships again, demonstrating that it is not the curve of the Earth that is obscuring the hull, but rather the resolution limits of optics. The law of perspective dictates that objects distant on a plane will appear to disappear bottom first, due to the increasingly shallow angle at farther distances with higher points.

An example of this observation can be seen here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VFhhCYYkILw
You can see the bottom of the ship appear to melt into the horizon as if it is being diffracted and not clearly resolved.
This makes another flat earth justification, and also explains why objects appear to be obscured by the horizon. https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/458194824911126541/458284527308111882/ship-2.jpg

peanut butter fluffernutter icing 🤤

It's like almost 5 in the morning, Thursday