Angular Resolution https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/458196098767388674/459052120495095818/Angular_Resolution_01_v001.webp

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/458196098767388674/459052123091632138/Angular_Resolution_02_v001.webp

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/458196098767388674/459052121896124436/Angular_Resolution_03_v002_1.webp

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/458196098767388674/459052121065783297/Angular_Resolution_04_v002.webp

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/458196098767388674/459052122537721856/Angular_Resolution_05_v004.webp

https://plus.google.com/116502556172406985386/posts/Qegqk1jSNEE

https://plus.google.com/116502556172406985386/posts/fzjPdL8H7FX

https://plus.google.com/116502556172406985386/posts/4D6qoxFBSEy

Imagine this cone is one of your eye cells at the back of your retina
That's the "angular resolution"
At 5.4km, an object must be AT LEAST 4.8m in diameter to register as a single pixel
Even looking straight and level that pixel will merge with the horizon
An object would disappear bottom first https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/458196098767388674/466295250198200320/DeepinScreenshot_select-area_20180710085940.png at 2000 meters https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/458196098767388674/466295250701385728/DeepinScreenshot_select-area_20180710091613.png at 5432m the bottom half of your angular resolution is gone https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/379214321907007488/466288992611205154/DeepinScreenshot_select-area_20180710085513.png

Let's work from the center of vision out to the edges , Up (sky) Down (ground) So this image https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/379214321907007488/468559885718519848/unknown.png Below the blue you can only see ground
Above sky.
Now how do we bring the max viewing distance into focus?
max viewing distance of the ground
that is... We can only use the bottom half of our vision.
The central part is unresolvable.
The upper part is looking for the sky. The angle between B and C is fixed. We will say the same as the eye .02 degrees. So we are seeing above and below the blue cone but not the cone itself. Like seeing the horizon...the horizon is unresolvable...but the ground leading to it and the sky above it we can see. Question: So what happens when line A to C gets parallel to the ground? Answer: Whatever is in the cone is gone, the cone turns to a line. Exactly and what's in that cone. Anything in a line extending from A to C to infinity will never intersect the ground . But the cone is the area between B and C. So the ground stops at B , anything above point C can only see sky. So the cone in the drawing is the unresolvable part of the camera lens or our vision.

The cone does reverse inside the eye.
Light is projected on to the retina. We don't see things directly.
It goes through the lens is projected and inverted. https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/379214321907007488/466469361562026015/kan_ch26_f001.png https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/379214321907007488/466469513500688384/retinaimage.png Those images are right for a single point of light. This is part of another misconception. https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/379214321907007488/468563187713835020/unknown.png This illustrate how we would see a SINGLE point of light. Say a single photon reflecting off the molecule of a wall
Take notice how it emanates in a sphere. Now what we see is the light reflecting from EVERY molecule spherical , and traveling out. The important thing is this. The airy disks I started with.
That is what EACH point is.
Trillions (probably more) of points of light. We don't see each point. We can only differentiate points to the angular resolution limit.
So a trillion points in a 4 ft space at 3 miles looks like a point. Think of the horizon as a bunch of points of light, and not as a building , a boat or mountain.
Then equate an entire object to a point of light. As far as the angle goes. The angular size on an object has the same angular size when projected onto the retina.

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/379214321907007488/468565104326082575/unknown.png All those angles between features of objects in the room are identical to the angles of the corresponding projected image of that room. (projected onto the retina)
So something that is 10 ft in real life and has an angular size of 3 degrees. When projected to the retina it's angle is still 3 degrees but it's actual size is .5 mm
projected to the retina.
So knowing that angular size decrease with distance. When I get far enough away from that something and it's angular size shrinks outside AND inside my eye. Eventually the angle being projected on to the retina is too small for the cells and photoreceptors to form an image from. You have to think of it like this. Whatever we see or photograph whatever is being captured by the lens is being projected to the retina. Only it is a physically tiny version of what you are seeing. So if a building is "trillions" of points of light...each point of light on that building will come to the eye at a different angle. The bottom angles will be unresolvable before the top angles because they close sooner in the back of the eye or camera. The angle is tilted away more. Think of rotating a piece of paper. You hold the paper in front.
Rotate the top away until the sheet is parallel.
and you are looking down the edge.
Now imagine you put a circle on top and bottom of the sheet and did it all over again.
Before the tilting of the angle the spots would appear a good distance away from each other. But as you rotate the paper those 2 circles will appear to be close.
The top of a building is not rotated as much from the plane of the retina compared the the bottom at equal distances.

Look , these are the same distances. Obviously the angles are not the same. https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/379214321907007488/468569265574903818/unknown.png I can make it even more extreme... https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/379214321907007488/468569771735253012/unknown.png But guess what....the top of the building will get cut off. When the entire situation is reverse.
Image looking up with your chest up to the world trade center. You wouldn't see the top because the angle would be too shallow. https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/379214321907007488/468570710344728576/unknown.png Look what happens when you are closer to the vertical than the horizontal, the reverse. https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/379214321907007488/468570964817608715/unknown.png Here are some questions you can ask yourself. Where is the plane of the eye? What is the relative angle between the surface of target and the plane of the eye? Give that angle , what is the angular separation of the points of light on that target? https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/379214321907007488/468574743637786645/unknown.png The relative angle to the plane of the eye and the optical tilt of the target determine the angular separation
If I rotate the green block until it is vertical all the angle will grow. If I rotate it counter clockwise all the angles will shrink. If It was more to scale the angle difference would be more dramatic. https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/379214321907007488/468578052302176266/IMG_3195_one_world_trade_center_nyc2015_aagdolla-1038x576.jpg https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/379214321907007488/468578348789006336/502382332.jpg Now imagine the building is 3 miles tall and not 1776ft.

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/379214321907007488/468578739572441119/look-down-the-hallway.jpg So here is what happens being closer to one wall than the other. That shows the slant/tilt. Left wall angle is steeper than right wall, relative to the observer. This photo looking upward is a good example also. https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/379214321907007488/468579766983720980/OrganicMechanics101.JPG

Post 1 of 2

How angular resolution works:
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/379214321907007488/459818062858682368/65116694_resized550bbc_sg_g4_eye.png

The further an object (i.e. boat, building mountain) gets away from the lens, the angular separation will continue to close until the light blurs together and eventually becomes a line or point or edge"
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/379214321907007488/468546464780386306/Airy_disk_spacing_near_Rayleigh_criterion.png

"As he looks downward toward his feet the slant approaches zero, as he looks upward the slant increases, as the center of clear vision approaches the horizon the slant becomes maximal, and at the horizon itself the land ceases to be a surface and becomes an edge"
https://zdoc.site/gibson-1952-the-perceived-slant-of-visual-surfaces-citeseerx.html

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/458196098767388674/461973747197411339/Screenshot_20180628-121601_Drive.jpg

As you look down the right side of the hallway, you'll see the angular separation of light begins to close the further you look. Then looking at the left side of the hallway you'll notice the angular separation of light does not close or blur as quickly as the right side.
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/379214321907007488/468578739572441119/look-down-the-hallway.jpg

Post 2 of 2

Here are some questions you can ask yourself. Where is the plane of the eye? What is the relative angle between the surface of target and the plane of the eye? Given that angle , what is the angular separation of the points of light on that target?

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/419246750260264960/470518575698935808/unknown-65.png

Notice the blue cones angle compared to the orange cone. The blue cones angle will lose the light first on the bottom and the ground will start to blur with the object but if you raise in height the resolution will increase shown with the orange cone because the angle of light hitting the retina or camera is made larger. Once the angle becomes too shallow the light turns into a line or Edge. Think of buildings or boats or mountains not as objects but as quadrillions of points of light or photons coming to your retina at different angles and some will become non-resolvable before others. The ones closest to you disappear first as you back away. You will see the ground running up to the horizon then see the horizon as a line and will see things like the sky still or if there's a mountain or building you will still see the top parts but eventually those will also become unresolvable as they get further away and the angle changes.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aVAWQGlXRWg

https://youtu.be/nK-WJwVGh8k

https://youtu.be/uLLwzKPwTDc

https://youtu.be/FD9PDJ-xZgI

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vSAlVua7T4g

Next eratosthenes

Ok

Disprove that

Also. They didn't even have clocks back then. They couldn't have known when it was exactly noon in Alexandria if they were in syene

When the sun is exactly above one stick they couldn't have know when that was 400 miles away. They had no clock. No phone. No radio.

The story is nothing more than a myth

Plus it works for a flat earth or a globe earth

Just make assumptions first.

Eratosthenes made 5 assumptions

All were wrong

It works for both.

I just showed you

Stop denying

Hypothesis 1
Hypothesis 2

Same.

What abt the fact that with a telescope you can see other planets that are spheres

Or the fact that satalites orbit the earth

And the fact that it's night on one half of the earth and day on the other side

balloons with relay antennae

ha ha

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geostationary_balloon_satellite

balloon satellite constellation relay network

If the earth is shaped like that

Then explain a lunar eclipse

The earth projects it's shadow of a round earth

Satellites are seen moving at 17,500 mph. They also don't look like those balloons.

What abt the people who have been to the international space station

And have said the earth is round

@jlegend What cause and effect experiment has been done, (i.e. placing a big balloon at a specific location to cast a custom shadow on the moon) to prove the Earth is the cause of the shadow, red, blue colors on the moon? The Heliocentric model does not predict them, the Saros cycle does and was based on a Flat Earth cosmology using pattern recognition.

@Human Sheeple Were you the one that did the modeling to show that a selenelion is possible on a globe?

I had a bet with the dragon, I used the dragon's numbers, boom the selenelion worked. My reaction was to the dragon "It's a globe!" The dragon said "No because we can't detect curvature"

So I said how the heck can we explain this on FE?

Superimposition of coherent light waves

Destructive interference

It then dawned on me that everything fit too perfectly, no refraction, light travelling in straight lines, I came to the conclusion that out of all the other globe evidence that "didn't fit" and this one that did that the Globe itself is directly derived from the study of the OCCULT.

How did you make the selenelion work, I'm wondering.

Shaving off small angles off all three axis

Cutting corners

Cutting corners?

Scaling Invariance doesn't wash with this, the distances to size ratio matches everything, to me it's the strongest evidence of the Globe I have seen

By far

So it was able to work within a particular area and that allowed a few degrees off to still work the lunar eclipse?

you can't just shave a few degrees of two axis, it won't work, it MUST have 3 axis corner cutting

So I am of the opinion the only way to verify the Earth is circumnavigate all 3 axis non stop in a straight line. If there's an edge, it's a plane, if no edge on all 3 axis, it's an oblate spheroid

Well, the primary issue was with the 2d plane for the lunar eclipse, sun being not directly aligned with the earth and moon.
I'm not familiar with modeling so I'm not quite sure what you mean, but what exactly does it take to make the selenelion work on the globe regarding its position. Do you have to change the sun's apparent position?

I'm not convinced the Earth is the cause.

Another method to prove the model would be predict which part of the "Globe" is supposed to be causing the shadow, fly a very big balloon up in the sky and cast a custom shadow on the moon

I'm aware, I was just interested that in your modeling showing selenelion working on a globe perfectly, exactly how has it been determined?

It would work on both spherical geocentric or a spherical heliocentric model also

IF a spherical Earth is indeed the cause of the shadow, which hasn't been tested and I remain skeptical

Initially I tried with two balloons, 2 axis corner cutting I failed to replicate it.

Even Russian Vids once thought like I did, "Impossible on a globe", it's worse, it's not only possible it fits TOO PERFECTLY

Hitler wasn't that bad of a guy if you think about it, He did kill Hitler

Could work on a ball earth in theory, but the issue primarily was they have to alter the position of the apparent sun to get it to work, that being variable by atmospheric conditions.

I've had senior globies admit they don't have a working refraction model, so the globe is still as of 2019 an incomplete model

The earth is obviously a triangle and the Egyptians were showing us

Y’all dumb

Honest question

Is mars flat?

You mean the red luminary in the sky Mars? Or the place on Flat Earth where they fake Mars?

The latter is flat yes

So then why do they claim all these phenomena work like over the horizon sightings, selenelion, and knowing the position of the sun?

So.... The planet Mars is flat?

@Human Sheeple how high on drugs are you?

Brother it’s a yes or no question

If they lack the working refraction model?

Sheeple. Your either a dumb fuck, high as balls, or paranoid.

I’m just here to find out if mars is flat

😃

They don't, they've had to come up with repeated ad-hoc excuses over centuries to get everything to fit, from gravity to abberation of light, to parallax, oscillations, deny the aether, particle wave duality, dark matter, black holes, white holes, flat universe

@Cake B0i ad hominem

@Human Sheeple is Mars flat?

Already answered that scroll up

@Human Sheeple show me a grain of solid proof the earth is flat

Dude you gave me two weird answers

I need you to just say yes or no