lounge
Discord ID: 484514023698726912
1,016,926 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 354/10170
| Next
pics from video
using share X
also u can use <> around a link to supress its info like I did for the above link
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7-pXWRn_wfk Stunning long range imaging over 100 miles in infrared reveals the amazing flat earth reality!
Kevin when are you getting to #1
soon โข
I'm at level 25, your at 26 or 27
I'm # 3
moving up
You better
I'm not a fan of being #1
Jefferson's sitcom use to have the music to go along with it, Moving on up!
link is that song, intro
The first law of Kepler formula looks like this: r = p/(1 + ecosฮธ) The second law looks like this: r2dฮธ/dt = h
Both of those are grouped with Newtonian Mechanics and only can be predicted with two bodies interacting. The Mathematician Henri Poincare has realized this and pointed out that a gravitation pull by a third body will give an unstable orbit.
As Miles Mathis has pointed out, differentials show a variation in the tangential velocity of an orbiting body in an orbiting system that has three or more bodies. This cannot happen.
Nothing pertaining to the heliocentric solar system based on Newtonian description of the orbit of the planets using a set of nonlinear differential equations can be predicted.
It is an intrinsically flawed model, that succeeded by a combination of errors with a barycenter on the sun and a rotating sphere. The elliptical orbits were required to get it to work.
@Citizen Z This is complete nonsense. I've simulated the solar system with n-body Newtonian gravity myself, as have plenty of people.
Sure
๐
Keyword
Simulated.
Lol
... What do you think what you are saying means?
Its a model
... What do you think what you are saying means?
Its not what we actually experience
What you are saying is the model of newtonian gravity when simulated can not produce a stable orbit with more than 2 objects.
Poor baby
You can't say that then when someone says that no, this can be simulated with newtonian gravity perfectly, that "no that's a simulation"
Where did flat earth hurt you?
..?
Its a simulation
Not reality
Yes. Yes it is.
A simulation.
There is no orbits
What you are arguing, is this simulation cannot be done.
It can.
Your argument, is completely and utterly wrong.
I didnt argue anyting
(It also matches reality to incredibly high precision)
Lol
Sure thing
In your mind
Nope, in reality
Nopenin your indoctrinated brain
I've literally done it
You orbited planets. Well done.
Lol
Yes, I've simulated the solar system with the planet's measured position at a specific time. I've then ran that simulation over years, and then seen that the position of the planets in my simulation matches perfectly where they were in the night sky.
Lol
Ffs you are brainwashed bad
I'm brainwashed because I've literally done, myself with no outside help, something that you say is impossible?
Lol
Ironic
You: "I've been told this is impossible, so it is! I of course didn't arrive at this conclusion myself or do any experiments, I was just told it but the person agrees with me so they are right."
Me: "I've literally done it myself completely independently"
And I'm the brainwashed one lol.
@Moist Mayonnaise It's just a simulation, so obviously it's not a good model in reality. Facts come from your brain, they aren't truth
`It's just a simulation, so obviously it's not a good model in reality`
That clearly doesn't follow at all
That it doesn't follow is a manifestation of your consciousness
No, it's just a manifestation of reality.
Why is it a manifestation of reality? Only truth is a manifestation of reality
If you
1) Measure the state of a system at a specific time, time A
2) Simulate how the state of this system will change over time until another specific time, time B which is in the future at the time you do the simulation
3) Measure the state of the system again at time B and find that it matches what your simulation predicts to a very high precision,
Then the simulation is obviously a good model of reality
But reality itself cannot be made to function that way. Your simulation is inaccurate because what you've seen is only verifiable through your conscious, which is obviously brainwashed. What you are seeing isn't what actually is
@Moist Mayonnaise I'm really sorry for what you went through back there๐๐
@Raine hey consider this, I simulate a situation and it gives "X" result, and then I do the experiment in real life and they both give the same result. What would you infer from that (lemme know)
I would infer that "X" result is likely true
but
a lot of simulation's results are twisted to fit the testers brainwashed state, so therefore you cannot know that it is true or not
?
Devil sign
They worship baphomet
Of course you're the type that thinks rock and roll is a thing of the devil.
Of course you're the type that ignores shit right infront of your face cut youre blind and indoctrinated like a good little citizen
Congrats on your successful brainwashing
I'd say the same to you. Have you ever considered the possibility that the indoctrination is actually on your side, pulling you so far into the world of conspiracies and fake facts that you cannot get out? When you're dreaming, you think you're awake...
I used to think like you. Which isnt thinking..its blind belief
Whatever floats your boat, mate.
๐ค
Oh hecc
It's even on discord
Devil
๐ณ
๐ด
1,016,926 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 354/10170
| Next