it was sabotaged

Wasnt*

it took over hour to get her to hospital

@Gaspardieu Alright you got the Princess Di role, 2 more roles and you're verified

Many people of renown often fake their deaths as a form of retirement from the public eye.

thx

Such as both the Elvis and Michael Jackson theories

Howdy

Has anyone actually done that which was proven though mainstream?

I'll have a look hamburger

The mainstream works for them.

<@408849222159433748> if you came here to learn, good luck getting good evidence from anyone.

l m a o

this server legit or nah

flat earth is a serious matter

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:People_who_faked_their_own_death

Here's a list of the confirmed fake deaths, which is clearly artificially shortened, only 33 entries

flatty gang

@lemont3a No it's really not I am a gatekeeper, you talk about pedo shit you get banned.

cool beans

Apart from that we embrace all conspiracy

Wow

any threats of violence will get you banned from this server as well

Was waiting for that

whether you are joking or serious

<@408849222159433748> Cool it, this is a cyber war, information, facts are bullets in this warzone

its not about beliefs, its about knowing the truth

like we haven't heard all of these jokes before...

@Questioner what do you mean

keep at it and you will be muted

@Hamburger Guy In reference to me saying what

https://www.theonion.com/astronomers-discover-new-planet-that-really-makes-earth-1819577474

Not true <@408849222159433748> Cats would have knocked a ball Earth under the sofa by now

another images NASA made by adjusting the tint and flipping the cloud patterns

<https://www.theonion.com/nasa-designs-suit-capable-of-protecting-humans-hoping-t-1819579836>

I actually found an image one time from the NASA website it was an image from the moon, I took it on to a photographic forensics site and personally analysed it, found multiple parts of the image where it had been colour changed and spliced and the earth in space had a clear cut square around it

Where'd you get it analyzed I want to do it myself

stuff like that has been put out there to trick people

Check fotoforensics

I've seen it before

It's a good beginners tool to start analysing photos, has free tutorials and everything

Only requirement is you dont use it commercially

Also many pictures off the NASA website show files from their data logs of being passed specifically through Photoshop cs5

Even on more recent postings they always have flags specifically signed for the old Photoshop cs5 version, which actually makes sense when you think that they use fairly old computers and old os's

I have one photo I would like you to look at

have to be careful with that particular topic

because like with everything else

there is disinfo out there

as traps

there are some which which NASA of course has faked

but also others which other people have edited to make it look like NASA faked them

I can take a look for you, can't guarantee results and it will have to be to right cause I'm currently at work

But ping it me and I can look

And as seeker just stated

and then the agents who know will produce the image which doesn't have the artifacts / pixelation etc. in an effort to make FEers look wrong

I can't guarantee anything I do find is legit or not

like they did with that hole in the ISS picture

that was on that music album cover

the picture was actually supposed to be from some solar "satellite" and not the ISS

different picture

to cause confusion

and to discredit truthers / flat earthers

PhOtOshOp cS6 is beTteR

Also many Images on the NASA site itself have the data file scrubbed so while you can still analyse the original image you don't know 100% how or if it was edited

NASA lies

and the CIA lies

etc.

Most .gov domains lie

If not all

They will put out stories about ancient structures being airbrushed off of the moon photos when they were the ones who actually painted them on in the first place for the narrative.

Add in all the fake aliens from outer space and UFO BS

Keep the seekers confused so they can never out out an accurate answer

divide and conquer

Same as some of the so called flat earth youtubers

some?

Hired and staged channels by NASA and the like

how about most / a lot of

shill everywhere

Well yeah true, my fault of bad wording

endmenow

They use them to out out ridiculous or easily discreditable theories to make the more legit ones look bad or weak

and then there is the shill labeling itself which is an agenda XD

And there is also channels like sci man dan who obviously goes round discrediting the weaker channels

Don't forget Wolfie

He got his ass handed to him by Subiratis on the Equinox

study all, listen to all, important to have an open mind, get the tidbits of truth, sort out the BS as you go to put together the bigger picture

I would say roughly 1% of youtubes flat earth channels are legit

And a large majority of that one percent is channels that will never have any viewers

Mainly cause of YouTube algorithm controlling channels that the gov doesn't want people seeing

a lot of truth can be learned from many of them, but trust no one

There are lots of little guys out there.

but most people don't look at them

/ for them

and even those get caught up in other agendas / narratives

this group and that group

varying opinions

no one is perfect

>>unmute 345665935400501249

<:vSuccess:390202497827864597> Successfully unmuted **Cataco**#1888

Strange detour but ok