I like that, keep sterilizing the bottom 5% percent.... Even me when I become that last 5%.

If you eliminate the 70 iq people, the 80 iq are the new bottom 5%

I mean random people who kill people you know the people who are sent to prison for killing people.

I thought you wanted to avoid the inbreeding problem

Random people who kill people is still subjective. The definition of murder is if it justified.

5% isn't a large part of the population so why would that case inbreeding?

You are removing 5% of the gene pool.... Constantly

What happens when all the 80 I people are gone? 90 becomes the new 80

Yes only 5% of millions of people.

Besides criminals can be genius too, look at al Capone

Most violent criminals aren't very smart.

if I remove 5% of 100 I'm left with 95.... So I take away 5% from them.... Now I have 91. And so on, and so on.

I dunno, stalin and hitler weren't stupid

I'm talking about millions of people @Grenade123

If someone kills a jew, is it murder

Yes killing anyone is murder.

No, you are talking about STARTING with millions

Oh, so it's just killing then? So we just get rid of the attack and the victim when the victim fights back

Great leap forward though

Oh wait...

You think I wouldn't encrage the best people to have lots of kids @Grenade123.

Best people tend to not want many kids

That is why we need to encrage them to.

They rather do brst in their field

The high IQ men can be the best in their field and the women can be good mothers.

Yes but people prefer similarly interested people, not all geniuses want a homely woman but a fellow genius

Homogeny anf all that

Yes IQ people do like other high IQ people and most women do want to be at home raising kids.

And what about those that dont?

Yes some won't that is why I would provid incentives for most of them to. You think that just because a few wouldn't doesn't mean most people wouldn't want to.

i have slept while you faggots are still arguing

We had a break.

I just dont see how its different from now

you shouldent need a break, aussie you started this 12 hours ago exactly

Smart people that want kids can have kids

The difference is that we don't have a eugenics programe at the moment.

You just wanna add cleanup for the bottom row

you know aussie jews arnt foreign right?

The problem is that they have less kids then simpler people do.

Yes they are mate, they are a foeign race.

they have been in europe for 2000 years

Sounds oppressive to me, for the greater good, you cant exist, socialists do that

So have the gypsies that doesn't mean the gypsies or jews are white.

Gypsies dont adapt, they can f off

they are white

I want to prevent simpler people from having lots of kids to improve the people in my country.

theyve nativized

But thats exactly what made simple people today

they are 1500 years more european than 80% of americans are american

Whites are a race you know that right @Arch-Fiend. Race isn't an ideology or civics it's biology.

1500 years more european than you are australian

Smart people and strong ones made society flourish so its strong enough to keep simple people alive, if it wasn't theyd die

Strong men and good times cycle

Australian is a nationality not a race.

nigga if you live in one place long enough you become a race due to isolated natural selection

Yes simple people keep society back I don't want to kill them I just want to prevent them from having kids to improve society.

europe shaped the jewish population, it created who they are today

Yes I know how biology works.

That only applies to natural elimonation arch

they have more in common with europeans than they do with arabians

or iranians

@Arch-Fiend No the jews did because they became what they are through selected breeding.

If everyone survives no genes are cut from the pool

selected breeding IN EUROPE

@Arch-Fiend That depends on which jewish ethnic group yo are looking at.

actually theres always genes being cut from the pool

@Dr.Wol As I said I just want to stop people with bad genes from having kids to stop those bad genes from continuing to exist.

But we dont know which genes cause that, smart people might carry the same genes

the jewish people had to survive everything europeans did while they lived in the same region, this had an effect on their selective traits. not only that but they also started from a small population pool some estimate to be as low as 400 people. they were also shaped by the political culture of europe and the selective traits nessicary to fit into the nitches that came up around them as they coexisted with other european races

Yes I know we don't know all the genes that is why we get people to take IQ tests.

Id say forget eugenics and fund genetic engineering, just edit the bad genes away

there arnt really that many objectively bad genes

Edit away age, cancer, als

What about the "evil" gene? 🤔

We don't know if it has any negative effects yet. I'm waiting for JF to publish his book on the subjet to see if it dose have negaive effects.

i dont beleive in the evil gene

But how do you explain Walt Disney?

He had the evil gene

It's not that they are "evil" it's more the they make people do bad things or disadvantage the people with those genes.

Evil is a point of view, Trump is seen as evil

As is Hillary

Elon musk is Hitler too after all

most genes people consiter bad are either things that cause people to be born so ineffecent that they are basicly unable to survive without constant support by other people, which those people dont breed very much though ill admit they do slightly more now than they did in the past. or other genes where people have survival traits which come at a cost/benefit usually shortening their lives but protecting them from something, like that of sicklecell

If you think Schizophrenia is evil then there is a gene which courses it.

there are several genes that cause it you goon

I think schizophrenia is an illness not evil

schizophrenia is also unfortunately tied many times to creativity

So is weed

😂

i also dont actually think autism is a bad thing

nor the dreaded "adhd"

Autism is too ill defined these days

@Arch-Fiend Lets say what you said about the worse people having less kids then better people is true why should we take the chance of leting people with bad genes have kids?

The weird cant communicate with people etc is bad, a very smart person that hates social things and obsesses about the best way to evolve spiders snt bad

aussie the problem of the worst people having kids isint because theres no eugenics, the number of people that group of people is breeding with is insignifigant to the population even at this current point of time. im talking about SEVERLY deformed humans who can barely make it to the age of 40

@Arch-Fiend I agree with you that Autism is a bad thing it prevents people from understanding people and on a large enough social issues.

Cuz "bad" isnt defined enough, to you being jewish is a bad gene

i said i dont think autism is a bad thing

@Dr.Wol I never said that stop starwmaning me.

i dont think people need to be monolithic psychologically