I say I'm a militant centrist, but I'm only ever half-joking.

But you're both the same.

I'm opposed to you.

I'm opposed to both of you.

That's what you're not getting here

I am opposed to authoritarianism, to an absolute set heirarchy that is required for either communism or fascism to exist.

Meritocracy is the only thing that has a place.

if you get rid of criminals by deportation it would be more effective at reducing crime than deporting all blacks

Meritocracy is the base rule of nature.

Do you think I became this why for shits and gigs. I see that the alt right are the only people who are for my people. Centrists just want to slow but not stop and revrese white genocide.

"reverse white genocide"

wat

We're still fucking alive.

where are white people being killed just for being white

Where?

who is advocating for that other than blatant soyboy racists

Where other than South Africa?

south africa

oops late

I know South Africa is fucked, that's quite clear.

But you sound like Black Lives Matter

if you want to "reverse" it then get white people to have more kids

Cops killing black people just for being black.

Do you want America to become like South Africa becase if you don't send blacks to africa or create a black ethno state for them it will.

That's not the only damn path, though.

I don't support the killing of incent people.

How would you stop it then?

The causation for the upheaval of the black community is quite damn clear if you immerse yourself in the statistics and history of legislation.

In short, end the war being fought on meritocracy.

End comfortable wellfare

How will you get blacks and other non white to lose their racial identy?

It's not 100% necessary.

what IS necessary

is that they participate.

In the US, we don't have a problem with asian people, for instance.

They're low crime

high earners

Yes you would need to stop them thinking of themselfs as a group.

tbh the social media perception of the "black community" is complete bs

They run successful businesses

They participate in society, even if they do have their racial identity, they are still part of our community as well.

The talented 10th do yes but what about the majorty of blacks?

We could agree on one point, that people should have the right to leave if a host nation is willing to accept them. But I would only agree if that decision is willful.

The problem we're in in the United States

Isn't because people see race

it's because the government structures see race.

yes if white people want to live with nonwhites they can move to singapore or any other multiracial nation that was not made out of a country built by white people.

Magic Genes?

Oh, because it's white, it's different!

Why isn't Liberia western it was modeled after America but is full of black people so it became africanized.

Shut

the fuck up

about Liberia

You have ONE EXAMPLE

JUST ONE

Name a non white contry which is western?

Name one penguin that lives in the desert.

Yes only white people make western countires.

You missed the point.

What's your point?

That the penguin developed the way it did because of it's environment

because of it's peer species and it's predators.

and that happens on a localized scale

Yes

the white corner of the world

developed the western system

under Christianity

the common thread through almost all of it.

If you wanna talk about shit that united the West, it was the damned church.

It wasn't whiteness, it was the culture that prevailed in christianity.

which didn't take root elsewhere in the world.

I think it's a bit of both. If it's environment then why didn't Jamaica, Bahamas and other countries which were European colonies that have European ideas and froms of goverment and culture be dominate untile they got their indepdance and then became africanized becase they were areas that were run by blacks and populated with blacks.

If it's Christianity then why aren't black countires with majorty christian populations western?

the white corner of the world
developed the western system
under Christianity
the common thread through almost all of it.

You're looking past the argument to say 'what about this'.

That's not a rebuttal of my point.

Becase it disproves your point that western countires are only that way becasue of christianity when they clearly aren't.

tide pods

lol

They didn't have the same European cultural exchange.

They were colonised by Europeans who built africa.

Colonization does NOT imply cooperation with the subjugated people.

Before Europeans arived africans didn't even have the wheel, a writen language, a court system, books, ect.

Who made the africans Chritians? Whites did. Who though them European languages? Whites did.

And?

Those are exsamples of how Europeans forced western culutre on africans.

If the Muslims enforced Sharia Law in Australia tomorrow, forced you to learn their language and convert to their religion (implying you couldn't escape), would you suddenly be cool with Islam?

As far as European presence in Africa goes

It WAS actually oppressive.

No. Are you saying western culutre is foreign to blacks?

Native africans, yes.

Those who grew up generations in western culture, not quite so much.

But when the Europeans left they just when back to african culutre. it's becase it's natural to them.

It's because the Europeans were oppressors.

You don't think they were to Americans?

clarify.

The Migrant Crisis in Europe is damn near the inverse of European colonization.

With the numbers in transit to Europe, and the willful disregard by the governing bodies (for the most part), it's practically an occupation force.