Yet you're citing research against people who would show a tendency towards violent resolution.

and deciding on genetic castration based on those factors.

You're conflating violence with violent crime.

These genes mak people more likely to commit violent crime. It has nothing to do with a persons desire to defend themsleves.

These genes mark people more likely to choose violent resolution. It has nothing to do with committing crimes.

If you perform a study on people in the Finnish criminal justice system

that is not a definitive study for what make's someone a criminal.

like dude your not going to get useful results by taking people who commit crimes out of the gene pool. your not selecting for a gene at that point your selecting for a series of events that stretch atleast a decade of time and more often than not youll be selecting for cultural and social problems while thinking your solving a genetic one. and also i dont think you need to give violent criminals any less a reason to want to live and ontop of that you dont even have a solution if they already produced ofspring before sentencing and youl probably just cause a cultural shift were people fuck more before commiting crimes

So having people who want to use civil means to resolve problems is a bad thing? yes there is a place for conflict but if it isn't needed then why use it?

If you perform a random study on individuals, and sort them based on those who lean towards violence, and those who lean towards non-violence, that does not prove criminality.

You're creating a strawman.

My argument is that both have their place.

you need to get it this eugenics idea out of your head because it doesent really work. again you bring up selective breeding and beleive it or not we never selectively breed humans before for a good reason, its fucking hard and not worth the time

it took thousands of years to turn a cabbage into a brocoli but a good political party cant last more than a decade

I think it is. The main reasons blacks in America commit so much violent crime is cased by them having more bad genes then other races in America.

not really

yeah, no.

tim pools video on chicago recently is a VERY good window into why african americans cause more violent crime

I'm a national socialist I don't want a party to run a country for a few years I want a goverment than will run the country for as long as possible.

It really is a cultural problem, not a racial one.

its cultural

jinx.

actually it would be better to say its an ethnic problem

because it is a cultural racial problem

Is that why they commit more crime in Canada , Ireland, Australia, ect on average?

I'm not certain that's the turn of phrase I'd use.

basicly in the united states a culture has been formed unique to a racial minority and that culture doesent function in the same society with the same rules and norms as the dominant culture

Asians are a minorty in America but they commit less crime than whites do in America do.

you took one word i said and thats all you heard

mmhmm

Then what did you mean by that?

*A* culture has been formed unique to *a* racial minority and *that* culture doesn't function in the same society with the same rules and norms...

The moment individuals break off from the cultural hive

they begin to thrive.

i ment what i said. a culture unique to african americans has formed in the united states and that culture doesent do well with the same system that the rest of the united states thrives with

Yes Asians have done the same but they commit less crime than the whites. Why do you think that's the case?

cultures arnt racially heritible

Well, for one thing

their culture urges success within the system

the african american culture is very different than the african culture

consistent relationships

the asian american culture is just american mostly

Whereas, the culture in the black side of things

tells people that the entire system is against them

That the police just want to shoot them dead any chance they get (police actually just want to go home at the end of their shift at work like anyone else)

that to study, and to aim to be successful is 'trying to be White'.

the fuck that have to do with anything nigga

This shows blacks in America have a simaler homicide rate to black africa. What dose that tell you?

it tells you exactly what it says

theres no hidden meaning in that graph

It means blacks are more violent than whites that's a racial difference.

I mean, whites committed plenty of famous lynchings...

Of innocent people, no less.

by that messure african americans are more violent than bears

are bears the master race?

they have a lower iq than african americans though

so doesent that hurt your metaneritive?

Not gonna lie, Arch

A few lunchings is nowere nears as bad as commit more than 50% of violent crime when your less than 20% of the population.

that branch really kind of seemed more aimed at making a joke.

Oh, if we were just having lunchings, it would've been much better. Entire towns were hanging niggas!

I think they should have been sent to Liberia.

Of course you do.

Jokes about typos aside

We're talking about entire towns gathering to kill black people at the mere ACCUSATION of wrongdoing. Not individuals, CITIES of people.

If you want to talk about violence, it's present everywhere.

Yes but who is commiting the violence at higher rates?

Look at the Vikings of the past. Look at the Spainish.

well its far to late for me to contenue arguing about this, so enjoy

And we've given ample explanation.

Law enforement is there to deal with crimes not the average person.

Maybe in Australia.

In the United States, we're entitled to defend ourselves in most states.

i think if you lined up poverty, ethnicity, and homicide rates you might find some surprizes

Your telling me you don't have courts in America?

That's not what I said.

You said that the average person is NOT to deal with crimes.

In the United States, we may.

If your talking about slef defence than yes you can do that.

economic mobility may be even more important than poverty

Arch is raising some very valid points as well.

Poverty isn't the main source of crime mate.

african americians tend to be much more impoverished than other ethnicitys in the united states but more so than that id argue they live in communitys with the least economic mobility and historically lower than any other. while mexican immigrants will be similar in poverty they will be new to the country and have actually experinced economic upturn in their last generation while african americans may have 3 generations of living in the same economic strata

citing a .wordpress.com site. lul

let me take a look at this...

Psst. It not poverty, its the incom difference. Gotta have something worth stealing and someone desperate enough.

Hmm though robber barons were a thing.

Maybe difference of force?

Also, I'd point out to you, Aussie

Most of the people pictured in this article

alot of whites in the midwest and the appalachia mountians don't have jobs how could you be more impoverished in Amerca?

Like id imagine a bunch of angry starving young adults armed with bats can fuck up an unarmed man.

Would likely be undesirables.

But add in a gun then.

That's Opioid country, there.

What you mean by poor btw.

Theres people who are living with little dependence on the economy.

Does that make them poor?