fake-news
Discord ID: 399204742846349312
10,305 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 32/104
| Next
The ones with Colberts face warped
Yeah I've seen some of those
That faggot jumped on a bed saying peepee tapes non stop
I remember a time when Colbert had good writers and a good schtick for his show
Meanwhile John Stewart is nearly becoming redpilled by sheer comparison. The notion that the dems should just get their shit together and beat Trump in an election is now basically a radical one
DUde, they are basically saying that the only way to beat trump is to be more radicalized
Most of the US dont want to abolish ICE or implement socialism
I know
They refuse to get their shit together
More like, they think they are getting their shit together
They feel like it
This is getting their shit together to them
No I think this is ego election 2.0
They think they're owed a win
no they don't think they are being more radical or getting it together, they just think everyone else is getting crazy
And to be fair to them, establishment republicans acted the same way
And they got slapped around by Trump as a result
Everyone but me is crazy
If everywhere you go smells like shit, check the bottom of your shoes
But yeah I think the dems are gonna lose hard, and my concern is that they'll radicalize further
Which will be the end of them
A lot of the political frustration on the right has been let out with that hatefuck of an election and this presidency
Which is good. That's what I had hoped for. But now the left is going batshit
I dunno about that either though
Polarization is one hell of a drug
A lot of modern lefties tend towards echo chambers, so they're only going to become more solidified over time
Like there's a reason why you're getting commie squads roaming around
doesn't help that most media are in their echo chamber
Yup
And you have to remember that a lot of left leaning moderates are hearing this too
And so a portion of them are going to stay out entirely or join up
Instead of pushing back
Theyll do what happened during 2016
Quietly keep their opinions to themselves, then go out and vote
seeing the few reasonable people within the democrats trying to fix their party getting shit for it, i don't have high hope of Dems improving anytime soon
I think dems losing really depends on who they run in 2020. if they double down with a socialist, they'll lose for sure. if they pick a boring establishment hillary clone, maybe there will be enough moderates and "default left" who will swing it away from trump.
idk about that, if you entertain the idea of trying to find out why moderates voted for Trump you are basically nazi
(to get them vote for Dems in 2020)
If you wanna talk about popular opinion, majority vote does count though, and Shillary did get more total votes
the people who voted Trump for any reason or didn't vote Hillary are dead to those people
She just didn't win electoral seats
wasn't that very narrow win ?
It was like 3mil more or something
Not huge % wise but still a lot of people
I have a feeling the old guard within the party will see that it was a relatively close loss and say "let's try again the same way we always do"
I'm curious as to what that would look like on round 2
Maybe if Hillary lives we'll see for sure
If they can preserve her long enough
sure, big number in that way, but same could be say in electoral votes
Again, we're talking about a political faction becoming radicalized
Wherein electoral seats don't mean much and 3 million people is a lot
tbh your whole system needs overhaul..it's dum dum
It's not my system
I rather like the republic system
I'm a filthy Canuck
ah sorry, I just assumed your nationality
im bigot..
Id rather have the districts fixed to stop gerrymandering
What a shitlord
Mostly becuase the system allows the whole country a say
Otherwise america would literally be the city dwellers dictating law to the rest of the country
no it wouldn't .. there are systems better than that
Like?
hold up
Regional representation is a pretty good way of solving the problem
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mixed-member_proportional_representation
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QT0I-sdoSXU
Think this one would be better for burgerland
I really dont see how it would be
Because theres no way to grant seats other than by population
In illinois for example, more people live in chicago than the rest of the state
that system is basically a simplified version of how it is done in germany
and yes, it is far superior to the american system
because every vote counts
even the vote of a republican in california means something
Im aware, but im concerned how the representatives will be divided up
Especially with the rise of the new political parties that will come out of this system
by vote count?
By precentage
What happens when its part of a percent of a seat?
The senate has only 100 people in it
2 for each state
When you get multiple parties that have less than 50% of the vote who gets the seat?
okay... how it is roughly done in germany: the parties get their seats based on their voting percentage (you get 30% of the votes, you get 30% of the seats)
these seats get filled with the candidates that won their district
In Canada you get members of parliament per riding, so when you have the inevitable minority you have to barter with another party for a coalition
But I think the issue with the US is that the population is super unevenly distributed. Where like 4 cities would decide the course of the country if you did seats by % of votes
after that it gets filled up to roughly meet the initial percentage (really complicated math is used there, so i'm not going to try and explain it... but the end result is roughly 1% of votes equals 1% of seats)
sure, might need adjustments for the us - but the current system in the us is just stupid ๐
Current system in the US has worked well in not allowing our city dwelling population to overrun what they refer to as flyover states
in terms of representation at least
i did not say that it was always stupid ๐
from the perspective of when it was implemented it makes sense
the main problem i have with it is that it suppresses the votes of people in non-swing-states
which means that you traded "4 cities decide" for "florida decides" ๐
I have more faith in the state of florida to pick a leader than I do 4 cities
But thats the presidental election
this is normal legislative elections as far as i can tell
hey, if you want to live in two party system that is so great as we can see, be my guest ๐
you have faith in "florida man"? ๐
do you not?
hes the best superhero
10,305 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 32/104
| Next