<:GWnanamiRemThink:402195380894171146>

Like Benji is very far towards small govt

What is strange as well, is that Pence is less authoritharian than Trump

I'm too tired for another test.

I already took two IQ tests.

lol a guy in another discord shared a pro comie article blaiming Capitalism for US economic troubles and first response was "smells like communism"

What? watching Rick and Morty

kek

What if your tooooo intelligent for Rick and Morty?? Has anyone thought about that?

I think I must be

I can't stand rick and morty.

What if that show is just trivial to you

http://www.combatarmory.com/dpms-oracle-5-56nato-223rem-16-barrel-30-1-free-shipping/

rye

get it

zeh firearms

So theres constitution party

Whats that one? Just pro amendments?

Mont, that's out of stock!

Strict Constitutionalists likely

http://www.politiscales.net/en_US/results/?m0=17&m1=21&c1=62&c0=17&e1=38&e0=19&j0=29&j1=24&s0=31&s1=24&t1=50&t0=19&b0=21&b1=33&p1=29&p0=24&femi=10&prag=100

so they take the Constitution literally

idk for sure though

Huh, are they libertarian as well?

rick and morty < futurama < red dwarf

Cause well. I dont even know the constitution besides you know, right to bear arms

Also gotta go

I think there is some crossover but Libertarians tend to be more economic and some are anarchic

Right to free speech and free expression, including publication and religion

1st Amendment is most important imo

Right to bear arms, implying a right to self defense

like ok the 2nd enforces it in some sense but without the first we wouldnt even have the 2nd

etc.

right to a speedy trial, with the right to face your accusers

which one is rule of law?

without the 2nd you wouldent really have the first

Okay makes sense

symbiosis works that way

Every single part of the bill of rights is important.

Never heard of the constitution party

first is FIRST for a reason though

Cause I agree with all the examples Ryecast

they work to support eachother

One of the most important ones is #10

which nobody EVER pays attention to.

We dont pay much attention to any of it tbh

we take it for granted

http://www.billofrightsinstitute.org/founding-documents/bill-of-rights/

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

it would be nice if the full context of the 2nd was applied in the united states rather than just the last half though

A big honking federal government is unconstitutional.

What do you mean by that, Arch-fiend?

price match using it

a well regulated milita nessicary to the security of the nation

everytime a militia forms they tend to be extremists

You're missing commas.

You're missing the context of what that first line is

National Guard essentially serves that function though

the national guard is a branch of the military isint it?

You're missing the whole point

That is not a restriction

that is a justification.

```A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.```

yea they are army but they essentially are home defense

i dont know why you think that i think its a restriction

A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state

we dont have a well regulated milita

[Because a well trained militia is necessary if we're going to be able to stay free]

The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

People have the right to own weapons, bear arms, be familiar with their riflery

yeah only the right of the people to keep and bear arms not being infringed is part of the 2nd that anyone actually defends

That's the only part there is to it.

and organize if the government proves to be tyrannical in order to over throw it

The true injustice is when people relegate it to hunting.

That clearly isn't what it's talking about.

It's also not talking about members of a militia.

sure, and the fact that we dont have a well regulated milita

It's saying because the ability of a militia may be necessary to be formed, this right over here isn't going to be fucked around with.

the militia i would assume is only necessary if the people needed to overthrow a tyrannical government?

Yes.

The very government that might try to take our guns away.

so basically we dont see a need for it in our society now

ah well id kinda argue with the founding fathers that armament isint the only nessessity to actualy having a well regulated milita

but we are able to be ready should the possibility arise

Well, if discourse should *actually* fall to civil war

i mean yea that would justify it

lets hope it doesnt come to that

i think its justified in order to prevent civil war and prevent many forms of social decay and threat of invasion

Conversation came up a while back, a rather convincing argument that Healthcare actually IS a human right.

and that doesn't mean what Bernie thinks it means.

At the core of it, is self-preservation. As enshrined as a core belief, Life is a human right.

its the right to choose id think?

Does someone have a right to be saved?

because I don't think so 😛

in germany: kinda

You have a right to preserve yourself.

idk man christians are always tryin save people lel

yeah, I have a right to do so

but if it's beyond my means It means I need to be saved

Life, Liberty, and Pursuit of Happiness