general
Discord ID: 463054787336732683
845,392 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 184/8454
| Next
awesome
Elderly actually do a ton of shoplifting
lmao
๐
doesn't matter
but if i reacted and did an encounter based on just that... then yea, i am in the wrong..
didn't get the profile
got lots of room in those granny panties
elderly people do steal
like they steal anything not bolted down..
they have nothing to lose
no one will send them to jail in most cases
once i saw an elderly stole a napkin dispenser in a restaurant..
juries wont convict, etc
I'm generalizing of course
Also they lead boring lives, and their brains are deteriorating making them make worse decisions
but still i would pay attention to both if the area is known to have shoplifting and they get hit daily
because it could also be a 9 yr old taking stuff because their mom is on the phone not giving a f about anything..
IF you saw a white person with a nice car pull into a house in a low income black neighborhood in the middle of the night that is known for drug dealing, then leave shortly there after, would you be in the wrong for stopping that car and asking whats going on? or is it reasonable suspicion?
^ you have to say, potential suspect left a known drug dealing spot :V
I used to get followed around stores and get dirty looks fairly often as a white person when I had long hair and dressed more like a skater.
no mention of race or socio-economic status
๐
i would be fucking screwed if i was a cop, i profile always..
everyone does, its the problem with racial profiling rules. Stopping someone because they are black is wrong. but since you have to trust a police officer to tell you the truth, and you don't trust them to do so, stopping a black person at all becomes wrong.
I have fun stereotyping people I see like "Oh yeah that person definitely listens to shitty alt-rock". Obviously I still treat them the same
because both involve profiling
but one is what he is, vs what he was doing
@Grenade123 lol cops have to jump through extra hoops when trying to stop a black person, that's why it's such bs the rules are now..
it is stupid
like they want to make it where if a black person has a gun, you cannot use lethal force until he starts shooting
thats why BLM wants now..
i remember the ACLU wanted cams on cops
which is bs because if the guy is threatening, you still can't go to lethal until he actually attempts to use it
BLM doesn't want cams
๐
then the cams started disproving the narrative of dun noffin wrong so then they wanted to remove the cams
any young person is likely to commit crime more then that same person older, on average
it was hilarious
because they know they cause half the shit also and leads the cop to where they have to react with lethal force..
disagreableness goes down with age
like that one video where the cop pulled his gun on kids
"We want cams to hold cops accountable!....wait wait wait, this is recording black people?! THATS A VIOLATION OF PRIVACY! HOW DARE YOU!"
he pulled his gun because the kids were crowding him when he was effecting an arrest..
Wait, the ACLU is against cop cams now?
^BLM mainly
yup
turns out they support what the cops says most of the time
they are against free speech too
who knew
I know they walked back somewhat recently on free speech, but never heard of that
i think ACLU starting to change because they went full SJW..
oh, the cop cam thing was years ago already
because they found out they make tons of money joining the left :V
ever since trump went to the white house
people donated to them, they made more money in that 1 week than the previous years
annually
I feel like I need a gif of that time Homer Simpson burnt an ACLU membership card now
snopes bias is hilarious
lol
"he American Civil Liberties Union has demanded police in Washington, D.C. disable their body cameras for the duration of inaugural protests in 2017"
snopes: "Mostly false..... the ACLU wanted them to turn off there body cameras for all riots in DC"
oh so wrong event..
ok , false..
no, not even the wrong event
just not the only event
oh, all riots
hah!
They take the most extreme easily disproven version of claims to debunk the truthful ones. AKA a strawman
"no no no, they didn't want them turning it off at the inauguration, that is just straight up lies. They don't want them filming any protest at all!"
when will we treat companies that have a platform be forced to abide by the constitution :V
because i am getting really tired of "they are a company, they can be prejudice"
:V
I swear, if Trump said the sky is blue they'd say "Mostly False:
^"well it was mostly cloudy, so it should be gray"
snopes: "mostly false, comment not nearly as extreme as the actual facts."
During sunset's it's all sorts of colors, and depending on the weather it can be gray
you know
trump should make a statement about somone trans's gender, and state to refer to them with their prefered pronoun
i wonder what would happen then
I remember when Snopes debunked a Babylon bee article
"CNN buys giant washing machine to spin news"
Like, come on guys
trump should get an alt on twitter and not tell anyone and just don't use his main twitter for a month, let's see how many journalists' head will implode
Lmao
I don't think he can do that though
use his alt
doesn't even need to tell who it is
Who would he choose for his anime avatar
Twitter is how he plays 5D chess
He won't move to an alt
Lol
for a month
that's his 5D chess
Dude fucks with the media so perfectly
Plays them like a fiddle
because journalist would be like, "white house takes over trump's tweets." or "trump can no longer tweet"
:V
and then we finds out he's tweeting off an alt
๐
845,392 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 184/8454
| Next