Also let us not forget how many talented Jews they decided to eject or imprison or massacre.

If the Austro-Hungarians and Turks not been complete clown shows the Triple Alliance would've won. And had that happened we wouldn't have had any Nazis or Commies.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9CKibuwPRhs

Oh I didn't know this...

Get past the bashing of Democrats for the election thing.

Then I found out that all Democrats on the senate at the time during 2014.

They all voted to repeal the free speech prevision of the 1st amendment.

Why didn't I know about this!?

France would've lost some colonies in the peace treaty, the Austro-Hungarians would've taken land in the Balkans, and the Turks would've taken the North Caucasus (and quickly lost it thereafter as their empire was falling to bits already).

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/sep/11/gop-blocks-democrats-push-rewrite-first-amendment-/

It's quite possible though that the Germans would've made the same mistake as the Entente and imposed crushing war reparations, thus fostering authoritarianism in western Europe. The US would be laughing though.

Did anyone know that?

That the Democrats during 2014 voted to rewrite the first amendment by repealing it?

I sure as hell didn't know.

It was referenced in one of the hearings this week, but it's otherwise such a laughable attempt that it doesn't merit notice.

That article is hyperbolic.

They wanted to repeal the campaign finance reform laws.

Democrats are minorities in both houses and don't hold the executive. They can't pass anything, let alone a constitutional amendment.

Even if they get their blue wave they can't do jack shit.

It is still chilling that they are willing to go that far...

Willing to attack the first amendment.

You think they have scruples?

No... the constitution hasn't been amendment in 200 years, why start now because something didn't go their way.

It is the attempt that scares me.

What else would they amend if it doesn't go their way?

What else would they amend if it doesn't suit their narrative?

To me that is a selfish party that only thought about themselves, not what the American people want.

Only the American people should have the right to amend any amendment.

That is what I think.

I think some things should not be amendable whatsoever

Depending on what standard you want to take, the last amendment was in 1992.

Some people don't really count that though, and go with 1971.

Added... not amended.

We can add amendments, but rewriting is dangerous.

Tbh the bigger issue isn't necessarily openly changing the constitution itself, it's the constant undermining

I don't think it'll ever be amended ever again. The next change to the constitution will be it being abolished outright.

I surely don't trust a party that only thinks about themselves, censor those who are not parroting their narrative, and constantly label people without proof.

The political system is too diseased to gather the unity necessary to amend it.

At least legitimately. A coup or engineered constitutional crisis is possible.

Sure as hell feel like what the Democrats are trying now Atkins.

The resistance in the "White House..."

The Resistance existance.

For that matter.

A coup.

Engineered Constitutional Crisis, they keep talking about constitutional crisis over and over.

When it was fine what is happening 20 years ago.

It is all about keeping their power which they lost last election.

They are fighting to get it back.

It's almost as though political parties are egocentric

And exist for the sole purpose of self perpetuation

I just can't trust a Democrat right now...

Other than some sane members, they are few and inbetween.

If only a prominent American historical figure had advocated against political parties

Oh a socialist tried to kill a Brazil politican!

O.O

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GpMRPESzUKI

Yeah I saw that title. In transit though

Wow... just wow.

I hope the assassin is caught and punished.

I'm not surprised

I am not surprised either.

What will surprise me is how everyone reacts afterwards.

Will they take this attempt serious, or will they blow it off.

Will they cheer it or will they condemn it.

Violence is to socialism as hiding pedos is to the Catholic Church. Not everyone takes part, but the major players do every time

well it wasnt sgt mark iv

I don't disagree with that accessment.

: |

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-welGFRKXPQ

Yeah Obama pushed hard on hyperbole against Republican party, trying to paint them as things they are not.

Basically he is one of the contributors of this violated politics.

He was also the result of them

I found that hilarious that the guy started to act like a auctionar.

That was levity in a bad situation.

Remember when it was waycist to complain about Obama's policies? Remember when people said he should be voted in based on the historical significance?

Similarly though remember when you couldn't be a patriot without living PATRIOT? Or the Iraq war?

Even though the former was an absolute shitshow and the justification for the latter a farce

I know.

Don't have to tell me.

The slow decline has just been amazing to watch

Particularly in the wake of the let's "epiphany" that it's all Time Travellin' Trump's fault

I bet he killed Franz Ferdinand as well

I kept a eye on everything in the past and today...

I try my best to keep an understanding of time-line.

It is getting harder due to all the shit happening.

It's not easy with all the misinfo yeah

It's funny, you go back and read BNW, then you read Huxley's follow up, and back *then* he was like "this shit's actually happening and at an alarming rate"

It makes it hard when a lot of articules are disappearing.

Articles from way back then... like 2000.

And down disappear, but lately it is only back to 2014 now.

That's what books are for

I am afraid of this censorships is going to go further than the internet.

Book burning.

Also iirc Vanity Fair maintains all of Hitchens' old stuff, so there's at least one pov

@Dusty Morgan From my experience here people are shoving it off like it was nothing, or acting even. The other option is the cheering option. And then, much like Trump there are the silent people that will support him but not too keen into being open about it for fear of being attacked like Trump supporters.

I was at the gym when it happened yesterday and people there were just like it was nothing, "after all you can't even see blood!" -they say

https://cn-tv.org/tv/courtroom-outburst-man-threatens-to-kill-republicans-sWuT1Dpxjnc.html

Can your legal guardian open mail addressed to you without your consent?

Isn't that still a felony 🤔🤔🤔