general-politics

Discord ID: 418667927169138688


42,736 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev | Page 86/428 | Next

2018-08-01 18:24:07 UTC

Given the stupid shit Trump has done lately, it really isnt

2018-08-01 18:25:16 UTC

Stephen you are a gentlemen and a scholar sir, You certainly know some things. Lets continue this another time. I must return to work.

2018-08-01 18:25:32 UTC

Uh huh ok

2018-08-01 19:00:56 UTC

In other words

2018-08-01 19:01:25 UTC

"Tariffs Not Only Impose Immense Economic Costs but Also Fail to Achieve Their Primary Policy Aims and Foster Political Dysfunction Along the Way"

2018-08-01 22:23:27 UTC

every other country in the world does it to us, they do it for the obvious benefits.

2018-08-01 22:24:12 UTC

Trump’s threatened tariffs are meant to effect change in China, not — as is often the case with tariffs — to protect U.S. industries that know how to throw their weight around politically.

Many free-traders will see these tariffs as yet another in a long line of counterproductive moves by the president. There could be some truth to that reasoning. But the tariffs also reflect a growing belief among U.S. business leaders that a laissez-faire approach simply isn’t working.

2018-08-01 22:25:07 UTC

You have to look at the good and bad, yes its bad in the short run, but the long run it can help protect industry

2018-08-01 22:47:30 UTC

@FriarPop They've gotten richer BECAUSE they lowered their tariffs DRAMATICALLY over the years to historic lows

2018-08-01 22:48:08 UTC

They didn't get wealthy because of higher tariffs, but because of lowering it

2018-08-01 22:51:17 UTC

China has cut its average tariff by nearly 90 percent since the 1990s, from a very high 32.2% to 3.5% and during that period, their economy thrived

2018-08-01 22:56:10 UTC

If Trump wants other nations to get rid of their tariffs altogether, then fine, but launching unnecessary trade wars with our allies and harming consumers and workers in the process when this can simply be resolved through talks is hilariously stupid

2018-08-01 23:08:44 UTC

At first all the "experts" said, the economy will crash under trump if he's elected, then they said, hitting 3%GDP was impossible, now they say tariffs are bad. They are not experts but opposition. His policies are working and thriving. I'm not disagreeing that tariffs are bad, everyone thrives better without them, but they are needed now in the short run to retaliate due to 30 years of neglect and them not coming to the table on them. It brings the issues to the table directly as well.

2018-08-01 23:11:28 UTC

if they are allies why are they tariffing our goods at 400% or more in some instances

2018-08-02 08:59:00 UTC

That's a lot of text

2018-08-02 11:08:26 UTC

***hElL yEah***

2018-08-02 12:59:15 UTC

@FriarPop So essentially you're for anything these so called "experts" in your view are against, correct because muh globalism or some shit?

2018-08-02 12:59:31 UTC

400%? LMAO

2018-08-02 12:59:47 UTC

Where the fuck did you get those numbers? Charlie Kirk?

2018-08-02 13:06:05 UTC

Every country has been steadily reducing their tariff rates long before Trump started his trade war with our allies, like Japan, the EU, Canada, including the United States, until Trump had to fuck it up and then they placed RETALIATORY tariffs on us in response to Trump's moronic move

2018-08-02 13:08:24 UTC

This is a graph chart proving my point that countries *have* been lowering their tariff rates over time

2018-08-02 13:18:10 UTC

Here's an example these existed before trump, you clearly do not pay any attention to economics.

2018-08-02 13:18:34 UTC

270% on our dairy

2018-08-02 13:18:45 UTC

*The North American Free Trade Agreement between the United States, Canada, and Mexico entered into force on January 1, 1994. Under NAFTA, trade in all industrial goods between the United States and Canada became duty-free on January 1, 2008.*

2018-08-02 13:18:55 UTC

Come on man

2018-08-02 13:19:02 UTC

don't be disingenuous

2018-08-02 13:20:00 UTC

you have yet to prove a point

2018-08-02 13:20:15 UTC

I just did 🤦

2018-08-02 13:20:17 UTC

dude

2018-08-02 13:20:17 UTC

arwe

2018-08-02 13:20:22 UTC

fds.fhjsdlkfhsdflkshdfklshfsdkljfhlskfhsopeiuwhopiuww

2018-08-02 13:20:27 UTC

your only point has been that tariffs are bad in the short run but nobody disagreed with you

2018-08-02 13:20:49 UTC

I made that point and that nations have LOWERED their tariffs over time

2018-08-02 13:20:54 UTC

not increased

2018-08-02 13:21:09 UTC

yeah, nobody is disagreeing with you, it makes sense to lower them over time

2018-08-02 13:21:15 UTC

And that all industrial goods between Canada and the US have become duty free

2018-08-02 13:22:24 UTC

@FriarPop Which they have without Trump's retarded tariffs 🙄

2018-08-02 13:22:55 UTC

Now they're increasing them because we've launched full scale trade wars with them simply because of Trump's ignorance of basic economic understanding

2018-08-02 13:23:25 UTC

No

2018-08-02 13:23:26 UTC

Jfc

2018-08-02 13:23:33 UTC

No?

2018-08-02 13:23:39 UTC

Tell me where Im wrong

2018-08-02 13:24:45 UTC

Increasing tarrifs makes using local sources a a viable option when importing is so cheap, boosting local production

2018-08-02 13:26:09 UTC

Tariffs protect industries at the expense of the consumer which they get hit the hardest

2018-08-02 13:26:39 UTC

Besides, Trade deals aren't the existential threat facing factory workers

2018-08-02 13:26:43 UTC

There is a cost to everything

2018-08-02 13:26:45 UTC

It's advancements in artificial intelligence

2018-08-02 13:26:52 UTC

That's the existential threat

2018-08-02 13:26:58 UTC

Not yet

2018-08-02 13:27:17 UTC

@An Elbow The cost of hitting the American consumer seems more devastating then laying off a few factory workers, right?

2018-08-02 13:27:32 UTC

Let the market decide, not the government

2018-08-02 13:28:05 UTC

"Not yet" lol

2018-08-02 13:28:29 UTC

Technology is advancing too quickly

2018-08-02 13:28:47 UTC

Faster than we can keep up with it

2018-08-02 13:28:59 UTC

No. Creating hundreds to thousands of jobs is better than making a few things more expensive

2018-08-02 13:29:25 UTC

Making things more expensive is devastating to the consumer buying the products that have tariffs on them

2018-08-02 13:29:46 UTC

Bush's steel tariffs lost 200,000 jobs for every job created

2018-08-02 13:29:58 UTC

If that's what you want, by all means go for it

2018-08-02 13:31:54 UTC

Bush's tariffs also made the American consumer pay an additional $200,000 to $2.3 million

2018-08-02 13:32:15 UTC

You have no idea what economic devastation is lol. You live in a first world paradise 😂
As I said, there is a cost to everything... But these tarrifs will help "lower class" workers by mass job creation.

2018-08-02 13:32:57 UTC

Tariffs 👏 Fail 👏 to 👏 achieve 👏 their 👏 policy 👏 aims

2018-08-02 13:33:02 UTC

wrong

2018-08-02 13:33:09 UTC

Smoot and Hawley learned it the hard way twit

2018-08-02 13:33:09 UTC

they are wildly successful

2018-08-02 13:33:14 UTC

Oh really?

2018-08-02 13:33:25 UTC

The Trump tariffs are winning

2018-08-02 13:33:36 UTC

Tell me whether or not the Smoot-Hawley tariffs expanded the US economy in the 20s

2018-08-02 13:33:46 UTC

Answer it

2018-08-02 13:33:54 UTC

they did not

2018-08-02 13:33:57 UTC

No

2018-08-02 13:33:58 UTC

fucking

2018-08-02 13:33:58 UTC

shit

2018-08-02 13:34:01 UTC

@IИVДLID CЯΞДΓIФИ I have a request

2018-08-02 13:34:10 UTC

It helped trigger the Great Depression

2018-08-02 13:34:13 UTC

Really big deal actually

2018-08-02 13:34:25 UTC

they had no clue what economics were back then

2018-08-02 13:34:28 UTC

lol

2018-08-02 13:34:32 UTC

neither do you

2018-08-02 13:34:34 UTC

Would you mind listening to just 1 request? @IИVДLID CЯΞДΓIФИ

2018-08-02 13:34:39 UTC

sure go ahead

2018-08-02 13:34:49 UTC

Ligondese

2018-08-02 13:34:55 UTC

nuts

2018-08-02 13:35:06 UTC

Bofa

2018-08-02 13:35:27 UTC

Aye I mixed em. Whoops. Lmao.

2018-08-02 13:35:35 UTC

BOFA

2018-08-02 13:36:56 UTC

@IИVДLID CЯΞДΓIФИ When researching an issue that you have a ridiculous bias for or against. Don't look for stuff that supports your opinion. Don't look for stuff that denies it either. Read both sides and filter out the obvious lies.

2018-08-02 13:37:59 UTC

Im a big supporter of free trade. I obviously look for the lies in what protectionists spew.

2018-08-02 13:38:42 UTC

Me too. That doesn't justify your behavior though

2018-08-02 13:38:48 UTC

lol

2018-08-02 13:39:26 UTC

And what behavior is that? Does it violate the rules to fervently argue for what you believe in?

2018-08-02 13:39:40 UTC

I'm still saying the Trump tariff's have been effective. We have won concessions already, and hurt our foes and protected our domestic industries, created jobs, the market has approved of them. Only CNN disagrees. Consumers dont mind paying a few cents extra for their neighbors to have jobs

2018-08-02 13:40:33 UTC

The EU conceded not much except make a deal to continue talks and halt the on-going trade war Trump instigated lol

2018-08-02 13:41:00 UTC

do you hear what you said "halt on the trade war" that is what we wanted

2018-08-02 13:41:10 UTC

"protect our domestic industries" while ignoring the consumers being hit hard

42,736 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev | Page 86/428 | Next