You're not pagan

I dunno. I’ve been through a lot of acc @Tophet

You literally suffer from suicidal thoughts. You’re pretty much an elaborate tranny. @Kurt

I'm unsure how that defeats my point, or how trannies have anything to do with that.

Don’t worry about it.

>Anyone but me is a larper

>I’m the only great man

I've never said that

>Maybe I’m the next Caesar

>Let’s go ghost hunting

I do want to go ghost hunting, sounds fun

>You are all just larpers

>Fightclub is great for redpilling

None of this defeats my point at all

You have never seen it

Or read it

Kurt. The point is that you tell everyone they aren’t what they are.

Literally everyone

Loses its effect dude

I have not met a single legitimate National Socialist

Because it died in 1945

you're just stuck in this circle of idealism

You're literally an escapist

But you yourself claimed to be one for 3 years

Yes because I am an escapist

But at least I recognize it

On top of that, you literally “switch to it” when you’re feeling sad

My dude.

Yes, see above statement

That’s woman behavior

Materialist behavior*

Well am sad so gunna lie to myself

Begone

Lel

Also your definition of materialist is flawed

this is like the episode of Murdoch Murdoch

Where he discovers Spengler

And Spengler explains that it's his cultural soul itself that doesn't allow him to realize reality

And the episode ends with them restoring the West

Ok bud.

Point goes straight over his head

>Ok bud

But if they restored the West then Spangler was wrong

Don't patronize me

They cannot restore the West

That's Spengler's point

They did in the episode though right?

Yes because they ignore reality

That's the whole point

Don’t reference it if it doesn’t back you up lmfao

It does back me up

I was making the point that your ideology and cultural soul is blinding you to reality

Be a man outside of time, not within boundaries of materialism

Spangler is full of unscientific statements and contradictions

Yes says the introduction of a Jewish translation of his work

SPANGLER WAS A JEW

Spengler was only a tiny bit Jewish, but so are you so what's your point?

So just a slightly more Jewish translation?

The dude was fucking 25%+ Jewish

You’re literally having a Jew tell you about materialism

That's not correct

Also

My views of materialism are based on my own perception

Then they’re irrelevant

I already told you my philosophy is of my own inspired thought

Not of Spengler

Spengler forms a view of history

Which happens to be correct

You’re definition of materialist is useless

And can be aligned to reality as well as my view of materialism within it

Why?

Because some materialism isn’t good nor bad. It just is.

Never assigned materialism as good or bad

There’s no point classifying it because of that.

Nor immaterialism as either

Right. Because it isn’t.

Therefor there’s no need to classify it

Good and bad are based on cultural perception

Materialism exists outside of our perception

Yes but if it doesn’t make a difference because it’s not assigned to either good or bad than it’s pointless to classify it.

That’s the issue.

No because it still exists and is something worth examining the effects of even though it cannot be classified within our limited perception.

It doesn’t mean anything in your context.

if it’s not good or bad then it cannot matter.

It just Is.

Something can exist outside our normal understanding of society but we can perceive it and examine how it affects what just is

Stop trying to classify it.

>Materializing immaterial in thought

I'm not materializing anything in thought

I'm recognizing it's existence and the absence of it

If we do not perceive it as good or bad/it does not exist as good or bad then there’s no reason to classify it. Let alone use it for the basis of anything.

It just is.

I'm confused by what you mean

So, if I understand something can exist as neither beneficial or not, it just is, so we shouldn't classify or observe it's affects

Except arguably materialism does have an effect

If materialism isn’t inherently good or bad in your definition then it’s pretty useless to use to rely on it as something of value. It’s light pointing at a human and saying “you’re a human” you’re not adding anything.

As it appears along with the degeneration of immaterialism

Which is the birthed state of society

Materialism isn't inherently bad as it cannot be altered

So there's no purpose classifying something that just is as bad or good