Message from @Blackhawk342

Discord ID: 491053644301598733


2018-09-17 01:02:41 UTC  

Then they would add more laws to the International Court, allowing for Citizens to be extradited out of United States and be charged with those crimes, effectively holding United States citizens hostage.

2018-09-17 01:05:05 UTC  

I think we should withdraw funding for the United Nations, Expel any United Nations Diplomats and Military Personal, Stop sharing any Intelligence to them (Denying Access to Our Satellites), and finally demand them to completely sign the ICC out of existence. As long as they keep the ICC up and targeting our citizens, we should treat them like a external threat.

2018-09-17 01:05:18 UTC  

I agree with that

2018-09-17 01:05:56 UTC  

Any Western nation should withdraw completely from the UN and Make a new, International Union with a Constitution based on Freedom and defending it.

2018-09-17 01:07:43 UTC  

And name it the United Federation of Nations.

2018-09-17 01:07:51 UTC  

We also need to demand them to remove any offending nations from the UN, they have no right to be on the United Nation counsel. United Nations was originally made to counter Soviet Threat, now they themselves have become a threat to my nations very sovereignty, they are trying to make headways in trying to remove our rights. Remember they tried to get United States to sign a small arms ban treaty to disarm the whole population while democrats were aiming to disarm us of the other weapons?

2018-09-17 01:08:22 UTC  

Back it up champ

2018-09-17 01:08:24 UTC  

I agree with you Stefan, that the western nations need to leave that corrupt organization.

2018-09-17 01:08:40 UTC  

The UN was formed to be a better version of the League of Nations

2018-09-17 01:09:06 UTC  

and start the UFP *muhahahhahahahaha* 😄 😄

2018-09-17 01:09:16 UTC  

If it was formed to counter russian influence they wouldnt have made russia a member, much less made them a permanent security council member

2018-09-17 01:09:34 UTC  

you may be confusing the UN with NATO

2018-09-17 01:09:46 UTC  

Yeah it wasn't 'counter Russian power' so much as 'prevent global thermonuclear war'

2018-09-17 01:10:26 UTC  

The power of the UN is in its members staying within the organization to prevent an opposing organization from forming

2018-09-17 01:10:27 UTC  

shall we play a game?

2018-09-17 01:10:29 UTC  

Here the Logo of the upcoming United Federation:
https://img00.deviantart.net/7263/i/2002/31/a/4/ufp_seal.jpg

2018-09-17 01:10:49 UTC  

Ah.... did I get another organization mixed up with United Nations?

2018-09-17 01:11:15 UTC  

Well it doesn't change the fact that UN has tried multiple times to encroach on United State Citizens constitutional rights.

2018-09-17 01:11:23 UTC  

Yes and that is the sticking point

2018-09-17 01:11:42 UTC  

The UN was formed with the idea of unifying all nations together, which means everyone has to follow the same rules and laws

2018-09-17 01:11:52 UTC  

Sounds really good in principle

2018-09-17 01:12:15 UTC  

I am not following the laws that will stripe me of my inherited rights from the constitution.

2018-09-17 01:12:36 UTC  

Thus I will never follow the United Nations for they will shred the constitution that I so love to pieces.

2018-09-17 01:13:02 UTC  

not from the constitution

2018-09-17 01:13:05 UTC  

Not to mention that it would spell the complete destruction of United States as we know it.

2018-09-17 01:14:06 UTC  

The rules should provide as much freedom as possible for all citizens

2018-09-17 01:14:22 UTC  

Should nations want they can limit the freedoms further, but they will only apply to their residents

2018-09-17 01:15:02 UTC  

Basically this is what it is.... an Foreign Organization trying to force United States to sign treaties that infringe upon constitution and will result in the utter destruction of our sovereignty since we effectively gave our nation's ability to govern itself to a foreign entity.

2018-09-17 01:15:36 UTC  

Blackhawk, it isn't like that. United Nations is trying to remove rights.

2018-09-17 01:16:07 UTC  

if two laws are in conflict, one from a treaty one from the consitution, wouldn't the constitution be the winner?

2018-09-17 01:16:08 UTC  

That organization thinks citizens are not capable of owning their own firearms.

2018-09-17 01:16:42 UTC  

IE if the constitution says the government can't do it, it doesn't matter if they agree to it.

2018-09-17 01:16:54 UTC  

or rather, doesn't say the government can.

2018-09-17 01:17:01 UTC  

They already tried it Paradox, signing that treaty would have meant giving up 2nd amendment. It was during Obama's term. We narrowly avoided that outcome because Republicans boycotted the treaty.

2018-09-17 01:17:42 UTC  

pretty sure it doesn't work that way, but I am not a lawyer...

2018-09-17 01:18:11 UTC  

lmao

2018-09-17 01:18:29 UTC  

The Consitution is the highest law in the land

2018-09-17 01:18:30 UTC  

But social justice is ...not justice.

2018-09-17 01:18:49 UTC  

So theoretically it should take precedence over all international treaties signed

2018-09-17 01:18:50 UTC  

its not an obtainable goal