Its like weez gots dat checks n balanzes?

No, the supreme court has had unruly power since Marbury.

oh god pratel buy some guns

Since it has the force of the constitution with whatever it decides.

Hmm dis wahrld aint gunna end if dis here guy gets illected

even in enemy territory you can get something useful

SCOTUS really needs to be abolished.

And i vote murdering devpav

Why?

Lol

@Atkins have you seen NY?

I guess it's better than western CA, but it's still nearly impossible.

you're not assaulting fallujah here. a fucking shotgun or bolt action or something.

haaaaa....you're so lucky you're somewhere sane.

This notion of a co-equal judiciary has just driven American constitutionalism completely off the rails.

'Co-equal' really means judicial supremacy for as long as we accept judicial review.

Yeah, it's been this way for a long time though and changing it will be nearly impossible and extremely dangerous.

Meh its one of the three pillars man. Removing it is just paving the way for REAL fascism REAL communism REAL totalitarianism

Never going to be for it

I don't buy that it's impossible or dangerous.

@pratel move to PA! Very liberal gun laws and not too far

Paving the way for REAL republicanism, you mean.

Nah id literally fight in a war over something like that. Theyre as important as all of congress

The issue is that the new system could very easily be worse than the current one.

Welp

I got banned from a Discord group for shitposting in a shitpost channel because it was "offensive and racist to Mexicans"

You'd need to think long and hard about exactly what you'd want. And probably amend the constitution.

How do you imagine it worse?

@acarson which one?

Mexicans cant read english howd u get banned?

<:behehe:455403050614521856> <:behehe:455403050614521856> <:behehe:455403050614521856> <:behehe:455403050614521856> <:behehe:455403050614521856>

@devpav the same way election reform usually ends up worse. It sounds good but somehow always ends up helping the incumbents and the powers that be.

Like, the consitutions loses practical impact. Or is super selective.

Wait..... did someone outside of mexican descent get offended and retaliate for their mexican brethren?

@AnthonyLaCosaNostra savage lol

Yea

@pratel same reason Im skeptical of anti jerrymandering laws

Some white chick

No...... way...... im shook

Was she hot?

It sounds a lot better than judicial oligarchy.