Message from @Risotto
Discord ID: 495636708059119656
Doesn't prove anything even if they did ask directly about Kavanaugh
Might as well use a palm reader
rate eye
guys have you heard the news ?
incels are now white supremacy lol
I already heard that free speech is white supremacy. What tops that?
Maybe one day the left will stop pushing white supremacy.
What do you think that requires?
Please join me in always pronouncing "white" as "hwite" as a subtle jab at our oppressors
Hwite
if you hwite
u ain't right
:/
imma work on my new rpg podcast today
It's 'huwhite'.
Maybe the left should stop posting like animals if they don't want to be dehumanized
I dont see why the fbi cant be involved in the kavanaugh thing... they were involved early on when a sitting president was accused of sexual assault and then later DNA evidence was found...
If there's a credible accusation of rape then yes its a matter for law enforcement
its a protocol thing
MD police are first
A senate hearing for a SCOTUS judge should be about partisan bias and possible avenues of corruption
well.. in clintons case - the first thing that happened was monika lewinski signed an affidavit saying she never had a sexual relationship with clinton
this is well before office
but the fbi wiretapped her friend and she was caught talking about it
The FBI has no jurisdiction in a juvenile sexual assault case.
he was in office
he was the first president to give testimony in a civil case in which hes the defendant
this kavanaugh thing is well before office
thats what i ment
when the crime happened matters
I love these
"First Lady Hillary Clinton dismissed the allegations as a “vast right-wing conspiracy that has been conspiring against my husband since the day he announced [his run] for president.”"
democrats are idiots
pissing off kavanaugh before office
so when he rules, he's going to think that people are going just a bit too far left
not that he wouldn't be impartial
but that's going to be in the back of his head for a lifetime
There's really no standard of impartiality for constitutional courts.
thats good for dems tho... if someone in power looks like they are being bias