Message from @Redneo

Discord ID: 497644667102429186


2018-10-05 05:26:21 UTC  

Just like slaves earned more money and their owners spent it

2018-10-05 05:29:17 UTC  

Question:

2018-10-05 05:29:29 UTC  

Since autism has a genetic component, would you say its fair to call autists a race?

2018-10-05 05:29:53 UTC  

Discord said i should vote and before i didn't know where to go so it sent me to the right place, but when i got to the "register" bit i realized... I think i did this at the DMV when i got my ID

2018-10-05 05:30:32 UTC  

As an autist, this is a hilariously interesting idea

2018-10-05 05:30:35 UTC  

Lul

2018-10-05 05:32:48 UTC  

Dictionary.com: ``` a group of persons related by common descent or heredity.```

2018-10-05 05:33:05 UTC  

<:TimThink:482277772497125378>

2018-10-05 05:33:08 UTC  

I'd say its more a trait than a race then

2018-10-05 05:33:28 UTC  

Autism would be the #1 race, it has genetic markers. White, black, hispanic, these don't have genetic markers

2018-10-05 05:34:51 UTC  

What are those, Mega Man X doors?

2018-10-05 05:37:17 UTC  

We must secure an existence for ourselves and a future for autistic children

2018-10-05 05:38:17 UTC  

Tim might've been how I heard about this

2018-10-05 05:39:12 UTC  

the tricky thing trying to tie things to race is like any white people who have had ancestors 200+ years probably has a sizeable percent of of euro ancestry and any black here 200+ years has sizeable white dna

2018-10-05 05:39:32 UTC  

Whoever I heard it from also mentioned that yes, Simon is related to Sacha

2018-10-05 05:41:24 UTC  

the only white people who have been here 200+ years with almost no african ancestry are richie blue bloods and even then who knows maybe great granma had schtooki on the side with the milkman,the paperboy even tc

2018-10-05 05:42:12 UTC  

Did this fuckhead just use the word 'schtooki' unironically.

2018-10-05 05:42:14 UTC  

And european is not a race, either.

2018-10-05 05:43:02 UTC  

The norwegians are vastly different to the spanish for example.

2018-10-05 05:43:25 UTC  

96-97% of Whites have no African ancestry.
https://archive.fo/NPIyg

2018-10-05 05:44:48 UTC  
2018-10-05 05:45:14 UTC  

A lot of the stuff where white people supposedly having black genes comes from questionable sources like 23andme too

2018-10-05 05:45:22 UTC  

Oh, so I shouldn't keep going to Western Union to send money to my Nigeria?

2018-10-05 05:45:24 UTC  

I don't think that can be correct. However, probably a little less than that percentage don't have *enough* black ancestry for it to show in any genetic charactaristics. i think thats what you mean

2018-10-05 05:46:17 UTC  

Well everyone came from Africa originally.

2018-10-05 05:46:18 UTC  

23andme have added people some african ancestery

and error margin in those cheap and bad DNA testa are huge.

2018-10-05 05:46:40 UTC  

@Scribblehatch thats only theory😉

2018-10-05 05:46:53 UTC  

Like how evolution is just a theory

2018-10-05 05:48:50 UTC  

there is many different thorys of origin of humans.
and current information is in very weak basis.
only few bone fracments that have been found.

2018-10-05 05:50:13 UTC  

I would be inclined to believe based on the origination of certain ape species that we're from africa and nowhere else. but that same curiosity also brings up the fact that those ape species are still there and did not also evolve. so its all just a crap shoot.

2018-10-05 05:51:08 UTC  

The ones there are now

2018-10-05 05:51:11 UTC  

Are different

2018-10-05 05:51:17 UTC  

And share a common ancestor with us.

2018-10-05 05:51:31 UTC  

Silly goose.

2018-10-05 05:51:32 UTC  

and the genetic distance berween homo sapiens and homo erectus is about 0.17, while the genetic distance between africans and eurasians is 0.23.
so argument that "out of africa" and so closely related is pretty stupid.

2018-10-05 05:51:45 UTC  

I don't have smart numbers to cite.

2018-10-05 05:51:49 UTC  

But I am still correct.